Model Revitalisasi Modal Sosial Guna Meningkatkan Pelaksanaan Fungsi Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/emt.v2i1.49Keywords:
implementation of DPRD function, social capital, personality, organizational citizenship behaviorAbstract
This study aims to find a model for revitalizing social capital in order to improve the implementation of the DPRD member functions in Aceh. The study was conducted on Members of the DPRA, the Banda Aceh DPRK, the Sabang DPRK, the Greater Aceh DPRK and the Pidie DPRK with a total of 206 legislative members. Data collection using questionnaires and then data analysis equipment using a structural equation model (SEM) which is operated with AMOS software. The study found that the personality and behavior of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) had an important role in increasing the social capital of DPRD members which in turn had an impact on improving the supervisory function they carried out as legislators. OCB's personality and behavior also have a positive and significant impact on the implementation of the supervisory functions they carry out. The existence of social capital is able to mediate the influence of OCB personality and behavior and supervisory functions. The mediating effect of social capital as an intermediate variable is partial mediation.
Downloads
References
Aaron W. Clopton. 2011. Social capital and team performance, Team Performance Management, 17(7/8): 369-381.
Abbasi, A. et al. 2011. Social Capital and Individual Performance: A Study of Academic Collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(12): 1-18.
Abdullahi, S., dan Gorji, M. 2014. The relationship between social capital and organizational citizenship behavior in universities, Advanced Research in Economic and Management Sciences, 17, 68-75.
Aguilera, M. B. 2012. The impact of social capital on labor force participation: evidence from the 2000 social capital benchmark survey. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 853-874.
Aldag, Ray dan Reschke, Wayne. 2007. Employee Value Added: Measuring Discretionary Effort and Its Value to the Organization Center for Organization Effectiveness Inc. USA. London.
Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A. 1986. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6):1173–1182.
Carey, S., Lawson, B., and Krause, D.R. 2011. Social Capital Configuration, Legal Bonds and Performance in Buyer–Supplier Relationships. Journal of Operations Management 29: 277–288.
Castilla, E. J., Lan, G. J., & Rissing, B. A. 2013. Social networks and employment: mechanisms (part I). Sociology Compass, 7, 999-1012.
Dyer, J., and Singh, J. 2008. The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review 23 (4): 660–679.
Elanain, H. A. 2007. Relationship between personality and organizational citizenship behavior: Does personality influence employee citizenship? International review of Business Research Papers, 3, 31-43
Klesner, J. L. 2007. Social Capital and Political Participation in Latin America: Evidence from Argentina, Chile, Mexico, and Peru, Latin American Research Review, 42(2), 1-32.
Krishna, A. 2012. Enhancing Political Participation in Democracies: What is the Role of Social Capital?†Comparative Political Studies 35: 427–60.
Labay, I., Sujianto., dan Zulkarnaini. 2012. Kompetensi Pengetahuan, Keterampilan, Motivasi Kerja, Dan Kinerja Anggota DPRD, Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 3(2), 59-141.
Leana, C. R., dan Pil, F. K. 2008. Social Capital and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Urban Public Schools, Organization Science, 17(3), 353–366.
Macke, J., dan Dilly, E. K. (2010) Social Capital Dimensions in Collaborative Networks: The Role Of Linking Social Capital, International Journal of Social Inquiry, 3(2), 121-136.
Oliveira, J. F. D. 2013. The Influence of the Social Capital on Business Performance: an Analysis in the Context of Horizontal Business Networks. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie,14(3), 209-235.
Organ, D. W., dan Ryan, K. 2008. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organisational citizenship behavior. In: Personnel Psychology 48, 775-802.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. 2010. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A crit-ical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26: 513-563.
Randall, D. M. 2010. The Consequences Of Organizational Commitment: Methodological Investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11: 361-378.
Robbins, S.P. 2008 Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi Kesepuluh, Indeks, Jakarta.
Seevers, M. T., Johnson, B. R., dan Darnold, T. C. 2015. Social Networks In The Classroom: Personality Factors As Antecedents Of Student Social Capital, American Journal Of Business Education, (8)3, 193-206.
Tsai, W., and Ghoshal, S. 2008. Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks. Academy of Management Journal 41 (4): 464–476.
Vishal K. Gupta, Rui Huang, Ali A. Yayla. 2011. Social Capital, Collective Transformational Leadership and Performance: A Resource-Based View of Self-Managed Teams, journal of managerial issues, 23(1), 31-45.
Widyasari, Syahrini dan Santosa. 2007. Pengaruh Kepribadian Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Berpendidikan Tinggi: Analisis Pada Perusahaan Peternakan di Jawa Tengah dan Daerah Istimewah Yogyakarta, Jurnal Kinerja, 11(1), 40-49.
Yan Yu, Jin-Xing Hao, Xiao-Ying Dong, Mohamed Khalifa. 2013. A multilevel model for effects of social capital and knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive work teams, International Journal of Information Management, 33: 780–790.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal EMT KITA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.