Published: 2019-06-30
Effect of Capital Expenditure and Personnel Expenditure on Regional Economic Growth: Empirical evidence from Western Indonesia
DOI: 10.35870/emt.v3i1.94
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effect of capital expenditure and personnel expenditure on regional economic growth in western Indonesia. The data used is a panel data of 10 provinces during the period 2008-2015. The econometric models used to analyze the functional relationship of these variables consisted of the fixed effect method of panel regression, and the Granger causality test. The study found that capital expenditure has a positive but not significant effect on regional economic growth. Conversely, personnel expenditure has a positive and significant effect. Granger causality test results indicate a one-way causality from personnel expenditure and capital expenditure to economic growth and from personnel expenditure to capital expenditure.
Keywords
Economic Growth; Capital Expenditure; Personnel Expenditure; Panel Regression; Granger causality test
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the Jurnal EMT KITA. The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019)
-
Section: Articles
-
Published: 2019-06-30
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2019 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/emt.v3i1.94
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem.
No author biographies available.
-
Amri, K. (2014). Infrastruktur transportasi dan kepadatan penduduk dampaknya terhadap pendapatan per kapita: Panel Data Evidence dari sembilan provinsi di Sumatera, Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis, 2(2), 438-450.
-
Amri, K. (2017). Indek harga konsumen dan belanja modal terhadap indek perilaku korupsi, SI-MEN (Akuntansi dan Manajemen), 8(1), 49-65.
-
Amri, K. (2018). The macroeconomic impact of regional minimum wages: A cross-province data evidence from Indonesia, Regional Science Inquiry, 10(3), 163-176.
-
Amri, K., & Aimon, H. (2017). Pengaruh Pembentukan Modal dan Ekspor Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia, Economac 1(1), 1-16.
-
Amri, K., & Nazamuddin. (2018). Is there a causality relationship between economic growth and income inequality? Panel data evidence from Indonesia, Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(2), 8-20.
-
Amri, K., Nazamuddin., Masbar, R., & Aimon, H. (2019). Is there a causality relationship between local tax revenue and regional economic growth? A panel data evidence from Indonesia, Regional Science Inquiry, 11(1), 73-84.
-
Bose, N., Hague, M.E. and Osborn, D.R. (2007). Public Expenditure and Economic Growth; A Disaggregated Analysis for Developing Countries. The Machester School, 75-85, 533-556. Boston: McGraw Hill Inc.
-
BPS (2018) Statistik Keuangan Pemerintah Provinsi Tahun 2014-2017, Badan Pusat Statistik, Jakarta.
-
Burhanuddin, A. (2012). Pengaruh Belanja Pegawai, Investasi Pemerintah, dan Pembayaran Utang Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Fenomena Flypaper Effect. Jurnal Analisis Akuntansi, 1(1), 2-10.
-
Desmon, N. I., Titus, O. A., Timothy, O. C., & Odich, N. L. (2012). Effects of public expenditure on economic growth in Nigeria: a disaggregated time series analysis, International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, 1(7), 2-16.
-
Kuncoro, M. (2002). Otonomi dan Pembangunan Daerah Reformasi, Perencanaan, Strategi dan Peluang. Airlangga. Jakarta.
-
Matthew, O., & Udom, E. (2015). Estimating the impact of the components of public expenditure on economic growth in Nigeria (a bound testing approach), International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(3), 1-8.
-
Modebe, N.J., Okafor, R. G., Onwumere, J. U. J., & Ibe, I. G. (2012). Impact of Recurrent and Capital Expenditure on Nigeria’s Economic Growth, European Journal of Business and Management, 4(19), 66-74.
-
Muliadi., & Amri, K. (2019). Infrastruktur Jalan, Belanja Modal dan Kesempatan Kerja: Bukti Data Panel Kabupaten Kota di Aceh, Jurnal Manajemen dan Sains, 4(2), 334-341.
-
Mulyanto. 2007. Pengembangan dan Pengukuran Indikator Pembangunan Daerah di Era Otonomi dan Desentralisasi. Region, 2(1), 43-52.
-
Nurudeen, A., & Usman, A. (2010). Government Expenditure And Economic Growth In Nigeria, 1970-2008: A Disaggregated Analysis, Business and Economics Journal, 4, 1-11.
-
Paparas, D., Richter, C., & Paparas, A. (2015). Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth, Empirical Evidence in European Union, Turkish Economic Review, 2(4), 239-268.
-
Peltzman, S. (2016). State and local fiscal policy and growth at the border, Journal of Urban Economics, 95, 1–15.
-
Ramli, A., & Andriani, A. A. (2013). The Effects of Consumption, Private Investment, and Government Expenditures on Economic Growth in South Sulawesi, Indonesia, Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(14), 145-154.
-
Romero-Ãvila, D., & Strauch, R. (2008). Public finances and long-term growth in Europe: Evidence from a panel data analysis, European Journal of Political Economy, 24(1), 172-191.
-
Undang-Undang RI No. 32 tahun 2004 Tentang Otonomi Daerah.
-
Zulfan, T., & Maulana, H. (2019). Gejala fly paper effect di provinsi Aceh ditinjau dari dana alokasi umum dan dana otonomi khusus, INOVASI, 15 (2), 188-197
-
Ayuniyyah, Q. A. H. (2018). Zakat For Poverty Alleviation and Income Inequity Reduction: west Java Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 4(1), 85-100.
-
Badan Pusat Statistik, (2018). Statistik Keuangan Pemerintah Provinsi Aceh .
-
Banda Pusat Statistik, (2018). Aceh Dalam Angka.
-
Bashir, A. H. (2018). Reducing Poverty and Income Inequities: Current Approaches and Islamic Perspective. Journal King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, 31(1), 23-41.
-
Beik, I. &. (2015). Contruction Of CIBEST Model As Measurement Of Poverty And Welfare Indices From Islamic Persfective. Al-Iqtishad: Journal Of Islamic Economics, 87-104.
-
Darise, N. (2007). Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah.
-
Frans, D. S. R. (2017). The Influence of local Government Revenue, Percapita income, Education Level on Level Poverty (Empiric Study On City In West Java During. e-Proceeding of Management, 4(2), 23-35.
-
Green, W. (2012). Econometric Analysis. Seventh Edition. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
-
Gujarati, D. (2006). Ekonometrika,Jakarta (ID): Erlangga.
-
Jaka, S. (2018). Reducing Regional Poverty Rate in Central Java. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan, 11(1),121-135.
-
Maharajabdinul, R. A. (2015). Contribution Of Fiscal Decentralization To Poverty Reduction In Eastern Indonesia. Journal of Business and Management, 17(12), 53-60.
-
Maryati, U. D. (2010). Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD), Dana Alokasi Umum (DAU), dan Dana Alokasi Khusus (DAK) terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi: Studi kasus Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 5(2), 21-37.
-
Miranti, R. E., Vidyattama, H. C, & Duncan, 2013 (2013). Trend in Poverty and Inequality in Decentralising Indonesia In OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. OECD Publishing, 1-115.
-
Muliadi., & Amri, K. (2019). Infrastruktur Jalan, Belanja Modal dan Kesempatan Kerja: Bukti Data Panel Kabupaten Kota di Aceh, Jurnal Manajemen dan Sains, 4(2), 334-341.
-
Nursini, A. S. (2018). Implementing Pro Poor Budgeting in Poverty Reduction: A Cases of Lokal Government in Bone District, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. International Journl of Economics and Financeial Issues 8(1), 30-38.
-
Panji, I. P. (2016). Pengaruh Dana Perimbangan terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Tingkat Kemiskina di Provinsi Bali. E-Jurnal EP Unud 5(3), 316-337.
-
Saraswati, S. A., & Prami, I. G. A. A. (2016). Pengaruh pendapatan Asli Daerah dan Dana Alokasi Umum Terhadap Tingkat Kemiskinan Melalui Belanja Modal Sebagai Variabel Intervening pada Kabupaten/ Kota di Provinsi Bali. E-Jurnal EP Unud 5(4), 1292-1316.
-
Sejahtera, P. (2016). Decentralization and Poverty in Indonesia: The Cast of karo District. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 1(1), 8-15.
-
UU, R. I. Nomor 33 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perimbangan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah.
-
World Bank, (2010). Building Institusions for Market. World Development Report 2010 (Overview).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.