Pengaruh Operating Cash Flow dan Financial Distress terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/emt.v9i4.4681Keywords:
Going Concern Audit Opinion, Operating Cash Flow, Financial Distress, Audit, ManufacturingAbstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of Operating Cash Flow and Financial Distress on the going concern audit opinion of manufacturing sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period 2020 to 2022. A going concern audit opinion is an auditor’s statement regarding a company’s ability to continue its operations, serving as a crucial indicator for stakeholders in making economic decisions. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the factors that influence auditors in issuing such opinions is essential. This research adopts a quantitative approach using panel data logistic regression analysis. The analytical model employed is the Fixed Effect Model (FEM), selected based on the results of the Chow and Hausman tests. The study sample consists of 23 manufacturing companies selected purposively according to specific criteria. The results indicate that the Operating Cash Flow variable has a significant effect on the going concern audit opinion, as evidenced by a significance value of 0.0003. This implies that the lower a company’s operating cash flow, the higher the likelihood of receiving a going concern opinion from the auditor. Similarly, the Financial Distress variable also has a significant influence, with a significance value of 0.0057, indicating that high financial pressure (as reflected by a lower Z-score) correlates with an increased risk of receiving a going concern opinion. Simultaneously, both variables have a significant effect on audit opinion, as shown by the F-test probability value of 0.000800 and an R-squared value of 0.3485. These findings suggest that auditors consider key internal financial factors when evaluating a client’s going concern risk.
Downloads
References
Abbas, D. S., Ismail, T., Yazid, H., & Taqi, M. (2024). EKSPLORASI OPINI AUDIT GOING–CONCERN: BUKTI EMPIRIS PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI.
Altawalbeh, M., & Alroud, L. (2023). Going Concern Audit Opinion and Market’s Reaction. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 13(2), 650-664.
Anggraeni, T., Hady, H., & Nalurita, F. (2024). Financial distress, what factors affect it? Gema Wiralodra, 15(1), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.31943/gw.v15i1.666.
Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., & Hogan, C. E. (2017). Auditing and assurance services.
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of Financial Management: Concise by Cengage. Cengage Learning.
Felicia, W., & Lindrianasari. (2025). Determinants influencing companies receiving going concern opinions: Empirical evidence from a developing market [Special issue]. Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 15(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv15i1sip2.
Fenika, F. A., Arum, E. D. P., & Herawaty, N. (2022). GOING CONCERN AUDIT OPINION: FINANCIAL FACTORS. American International Journal of Business Management, 5.
Fidiana, Y., Prasetyo, A., & Astuti, R. (2023). Corporate going-concern report in early pandemic situation: Evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(4), e15138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15138.
Fitriana, A. (2024). Buku ajar analisis laporan keuangan. Akademi Keuangan & Perbankan Riau (AKBAR) Pekanbaru (Issue July).
Hartono, J. (2022). Teori portofolio dan analisis investasi.
Hidayat, W. W. (2018). Dasar-dasar analisa laporan keuangan. Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.
Ikhsan, A. (2021). DETERMINASI OPINI AUDIT GOING CONCERN PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR DI INDONESIA.
Koerniawan, I. (2021). AUDITING Konsep dan Teori Pemeriksaan Akuntansi. Penerbit Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik, 1-189.
Kuantitatif, P. P. (2016). Metode penelitian kunatitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta, Bandung.
Lokamandala, M. A., Koeswayo, P. S., & Harahap, D. Y. (2023). The Effect of Firm Size and Financial Distress on Going Concern Audit Opinion. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business, 6(1), 68-76.
Marhamah, M., & Indriastuti, A. (2024). Opini audit going concern: Mengurai faktor yang mempengaruhi. Jurnal Capital: Kebijakan Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 6(2), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.33747/capital.v6i2.235.
Melati, D., & Sihono, A. (2024). Elements Influencing Going Concern Audit Opinion on Manufacturing Corporations in Indonesia. Majalah Ilmiah Bijak, 21(1), 156-172.
Nurbaiti, A., & Yanti, S. D. M. (2023). The influences of company’s growth, cash flow, and debt default on the acceptance of going concern audit opinions. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 25(3), 359-382.
Nurlistantyo, D., & Wulandari, P. (2024). Pengaruh financial distress, audit lag, prior audit opinion, dan firm size terhadap penerimaan opini audit going concern. Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 7(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.21632/saki.7.1.95-110.
Publik, I. A. I. K. A. (2001). Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Putri, A. S., & Mujiyati. (2021). Determinan penerimaan opini audit going concern pada perusahaan dalam Jakarta Islamic Index. Seminar Nasional Akuntansi dan Call for Paper, 1(1), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.33005/senapan.v1i1.237.
Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jordan, B. D. (2017). Essentials of corporate finance. McGraw-Hill.
Rustiana, S. H., Sutarto, E., Rachmawati, E., & Syarifuddin, R. (2022). Analisis laporan keuangan. UM Jakarta Press.
Shafira, K., Zsalzsalbila, H., & Ashari, H. (2023). Sectors that accepted the most going concern audit opinion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Husnayain Business Review, 3(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.54099/hbr.v3i2.560.
Wibowo, A. (2021). Manajemen cash flow. Penerbit Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik, 1-324.
Yusuf, M., Tarmizi, M. I., & Maryati. (2023). Determinants of going concern assumptions in audit opinion. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Governance, 4(1), 56–72.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aditia Herdiansyah, Deasy Novayanti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.