Published: 2026-04-01
Innovation Capability, Absorptive Capacity, and Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Competitive Advantage in the SME Laundry Sector
DOI: 10.35870/emt.v10i2.5622
Rayhan Faiz, Dessy Isfianadewi, Yusuf Sudrajat
- Rayhan Faiz: Universitas Islam Indonesia
- Dessy Isfianadewi: Universitas Islam Indonesia
- Yusuf Sudrajat: Universitas Islam Indonesia
Article Metrics
- Scopus Citations
- Google Scholar
- Crossref Citations
- Semantic Scholar
- DataCite Metrics
-
If the link doesn't work, copy the DOI or article title for manual search (API Maintenance).
Abstract
Grounded in the Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capabilities Theory, this study examines how internal and relational capabilities shape competitive advantage among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the service sector. The research investigates the influence of innovation capability and absorptive capacity on competitive advantage, with collaborative networks tested as a mediating variable. Previous studies have reported inconsistent results regarding these relationships, particularly within resource-constrained SME contexts. To address this gap, data were collected from 113 SME owners and managers in the laundry service industry using a structured questionnaire with a five-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS to assess both the measurement and structural models. The findings reveal that innovation capability (β = 0.456, p < 0.001) and absorptive capacity (β = 0.439, p < 0.001) significantly enhance competitive advantage. Both variables also positively influence collaborative networks, which in turn have a significant effect on competitive advantage (β = 0.286, p = 0.001). Moreover, collaborative networks partially mediated the relationship between absorptive capacity and competitive advantage (β = 0.109, p = 0.048), but not between innovation capability and competitive advantage (β = 0.141, p = 0.062). These findings confirm that innovation and knowledge absorption are strategic resources that drive competitiveness, while collaboration provides conditional benefits depending on firm capabilities. Managers are encouraged to institutionalize regular customer feedback systems and strengthen partnerships with local suppliers to enhance innovation outcomes. The study clarifies inconsistencies in prior research and provides practical insights for improving SME competitiveness through balanced internal and external capability development.
Keywords
Innovation Capability; Absorptive Capacity; Collaborative Networks; Competitive Advantage; SMEs
Peer Review Process
This article has undergone a double-blind peer review process to ensure quality and impartiality.
Indexing Information
Discover where this journal is indexed at our indexing page.
Open Science Badges
This journal supports transparency in research and encourages authors to meet criteria for Open Science Badges.
How to Cite
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the Jurnal EMT KITA. The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026)
-
Section: Articles
-
Published: 2026-04-01
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2026 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/emt.v10i2.5622
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem.
Rayhan Faiz, Universitas Islam Indonesia
Undergraduate Student, Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Dessy Isfianadewi, Universitas Islam Indonesia
Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia.
-
Alsaleh, A. (2024). The impact of technological advancement on culture and society. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 32140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83995-z.
-
Anand, J., McDermott, G., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. (2021). Innovation in and from emerging economies: New insights and lessons for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(4), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00426-1.
-
-
Asnin, T. N., Prambudia, Y., & Rosad Ma’ali El Hadi. (2024). Developing strategies to improve business model of online laundry marketplace startup. International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System, 5(2), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.25124/ijies.v5i02.136.
-
Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., Caiazza, R., & Phan, P. (2023). Collaboration strategies and SME innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 164, 114018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114018.
-
Ávila, M. M. (2022). Competitive advantage and knowledge absorptive capacity: The mediating role of innovative capability. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(1), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00708-3.
-
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.
-
-
Chen, X., Xie, H., & Zhou, H. (2024). Incremental versus radical innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: A moderated mediation model. Sustainability, 16(11), 4545. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114545.
-
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.
-
Cristianty, L. I., & Wandebori, H. (2025). Laundry business strategy to increase revenue (Case: Sosor Laundry). Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 10(3), 2954–2964. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i3.55734.
-
Espino-Rodríguez, T. F., & Gebril Taha, M. (2023). Absorptive capacity and supply chain integration and their impact on hotel service performance. Administrative Sciences, 13(12), 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13120247.
-
Garrido-Moreno, A., Martín-Rojas, R., & García-Morales, V. J. (2024). The key role of innovation and organizational resilience in improving business performance: A mixed-methods approach. International Journal of Information Management, 77, 102777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102777.
-
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7.
-
Hottenrott, H., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2016). R&D partnerships and innovation performance: Can there be too much of a good thing? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 773–794. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12311.
-
Huang, X. (2023). The roles of competition on innovation efficiency and firm performance: Evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 29(1), 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2022.100201.
-
Hurtado-Palomino, A., De La Gala-Velásquez, B., & Ccorisapra-Quintana, J. (2022). The interactive effect of innovation capability and potential absorptive capacity on innovation performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100259.
-
Ilyas, I. M., & Osiyevskyy, O. (2022). Exploring the impact of sustainable value proposition on firm performance. European Management Journal, 40(5), 729–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.009.
-
Isfianadewi, D. (2022). The role of supply chain agility in mediating the effect of knowledge sharing innovation and absorptive capacity on competitive advantage. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2377–2389. https://doi.org/10.46254/AU01.20220510.
-
Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M. A. M., Molina, L. M., & García-Morales, V. J. (2019). Combined influence of absorptive capacity and corporate entrepreneurship on performance. Sustainability, 11(11), 3034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113034.
-
Kartiraharjo, H., & Isfianadewi, D. (2022). Enhancing competitive advantage through knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 10(8), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i8.1532.
-
Keelson, S. A., Cúg, J., Amoah, J., Petráková, Z., Addo, J. O., & Jibril, A. B. (2024). The influence of market competition on SMEs’ performance in emerging economies: Does process innovation moderate the relationship? Economies, 12(11), 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12110282.
-
Li, X., & Liu, X. (2023). The impact of the collaborative innovation network embeddedness on enterprise green innovation performance. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1190697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1190697.
-
Müller, J. M., Buliga, O., & Voigt, K.-I. (2021). The role of absorptive capacity and innovation strategy in the design of industry 4.0 business models—a comparison between SMEs and large enterprises. European Management Journal, 39(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.002.
-
Mulyana, M., & Wasitowati, W. (2021). The improvement of collaborative networks to increase small and medium enterprises (SMEs) performance. Serbian Journal of Management, 16(1), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm16-24369.
-
Najafi-Tavani, S., Najafi-Tavani, Z., Naudé, P., Oghazi, P., & Zeynaloo, E. (2018). How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.009.
-
Pitaloka, W. D., & Rahayu, T. (2023). The mediating role of absorptive capacity in the relationship of knowledge sharing and innovation performance in MSMEs. Ecopreneur.12, 6(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.51804/econ12.v6i2.15779.
-
Rijal, S., Sihombing, T. M., Akbar, I. A., Desembrianita, E., & Lubis, R. F. (2023). Peran keunggulan kompetitif, inovasi produk, dan jaringan bisnis terhadap kinerja ekonomi daerah. Sanskara Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan, 1(03), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.58812/sek.v1i03.123.
-
Sancho-Zamora, R., Hernández-Perlines, F., Peña-García, I., & Gutiérrez-Broncano, S. (2022). The impact of absorptive capacity on innovation: The mediating role of organizational learning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020842
-
Sufyan, A., Asad, A. I., & Novák, P. (2024). Radical and incremental innovations performance in Eastern European SMEs: An empirical study of developed and emerging economies. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 11(3), 537–552. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v11i3.1604.
-
Sulistyo, H., & Ayuni, S. (2019). Competitive advantages of SMEs: The roles of innovation capability, entrepreneurial orientation, and social capital. Contaduría y Administración, 65(1), 156. https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2020.1983.
-
-
Tran, D. T. M., Thai, V. V., Duc, T. T. H., & Nguyen, T.-T. (2025). Organisational culture as the antecedent of supply chain collaboration and its relationship with competitive advantage. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 36(3), 720–746. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2024-0089.
-
Xie, X., & Wang, M. (2025). Firms’ digital capabilities and green collaborative innovation: The role of green relationship learning. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(2), 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100663.
-
Xie, X., Wu, Y., & Devece, C. (2022). Is collaborative innovation a double-edged sword for firms? The contingent role of ambidextrous learning and TMT shared vision. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121340.
-
Zou, T., Ertug, G., & George, G. (2018). The capacity to innovate: A meta-analysis of absorptive capacity. Innovation, 20(2), 87–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2018.1428105.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.