Determinant of Kualitas Sustainability Report (Studi Empiris Perusahaan Pertambangan yang terdaftar di BEI periode 2022-2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v12i3.6359Keywords:
Shareholder Pressure, Employee Pressure, Government Pressure, Profitability, Sustainability Report QualityAbstract
This research is motivated by the rising sustainability issues and the phenomenon of greenwashing in the mining sector, which demand better transparency and quality in sustainability reports. This study aims to analyze the influence of shareholder pressure, employee pressure, and government pressure on the quality of sustainability reports using legitimacy theory, while examining the role of profitability as a moderating variable and firm size as a control variable. The study employs a quantitative approach, focusing on mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2022–2024 period. The research sample was obtained through purposive sampling, resulting in 138 observations, and was analyzed using panel data regression. The results show that employee pressure and government pressure have a positive and significant effect on the quality of sustainability reports, while shareholder pressure has no significant effect. Furthermore, profitability is proven to moderate the relationship between employee pressure and sustainability report quality in a negative direction, but it does not moderate the influence of shareholder or government pressure. These findings indicate that the improvement of sustainability reporting quality in the mining sector is more influenced by internal demands and regulatory pressure than by shareholders' financial orientation, suggesting that sustainability reports still function as a corporate legitimacy instrument in responding to specific stakeholder pressures.
Downloads
References
Agus, A. P. (2019). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: Evidence of reputation risk management in large Australian companies. Australian Accounting Review.
Aziz, A. (2014). Analisis pengaruh good corporate governance (GCG) terhadap kualitas pengungkapan sustainability report (Studi empiris pada perusahaan di Indonesia periode tahun 2011-2012). Jurnal Audit Dan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Tanjungpura.
Damayanti, A., & Hardiningsih, P. (2021). Determinan pengungkapan laporan berkelanjutan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pajak, 22(1), 175. https://doi.org/10.29040/jap.v22i1.2756.
Darmawan, B. A., & Sudana, I. P. (2022). Tekanan stakeholder dan ukuran perusahaan pada sustainability report. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 32(12), 3582. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2022.v32.i12.p08.
Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
Deegan, C., & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research.
Galan, G., Mahesana, D., Made, N., & Ratnadi, D. (2025). Pengaruh profitabilitas, leverage, tekanan investor dan kepemilikan manajerial pada kualitas pengungkapan dalam sustainability report. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 14(09), 1268–1277.
Kantohe, M., Kawalur, H., & Kosasih, D. (2025). Pengaruh tekanan pemangku kepentingan terhadap kualitas laporan keberlanjutan perusahaan di Indonesia. Solusi: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Dan Bisnis.
Leonirda Lulu, C. (2020). Stakeholder pressure and the quality of sustainability report: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Accounting, Entrepreneurship, and Financial Technology, 02(01).
Meinawati, K., & Wirakusuma, M. G. (2023). Profitabilitas, tekanan stakeholder, komite audit, dan kualitas sustainability report. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 33(8). https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2023.v33.i08.p19.
Meutia, I., Kartasari, S. F., & Yaacob, Z. (2022). Stakeholder or legitimacy theory? The rationale behind a company’s materiality analysis: Evidence from Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137763.
Nugrahani, T. S., Kusuma, H., Arifin, J., & Muhammad, R. (2023). Determinants of sustainability report quality in Indonesian public companies: An isomorphism theory approach. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(12), 3909–3921. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.181222.
Octora, V. C., & Amin, M. N. (2023). Pengaruh tekanan stakeholder dan board governance terhadap kualitas laporan keberlanjutan. Owner, 7(3), 2021–2030. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i3.1443.
Putu, I., Surya, G., Natha, A., Ayu, G., Asri, M., & Putri, D. (2024). Pengaruh mekanisme good corporate governance dan stakeholder pressure pada kualitas sustainability report. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 13(8), 1681–1693.
Ramadhan, M. A., Dp, E. N., Abdurrahman, R., & Lubis, A. (2024). The quality of sustainability reporting in Indonesia: Government, employee, competitor, and customer perspectives. AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi, 16(1), 2085–9643. https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v16n1.p39-p54.
Rizkika Alfaiz, D., & Aryati, T. (2019). Pengaruh tekanan stakeholder dan kinerja keuangan terhadap kualitas sustainability report dengan komite audit sebagai variabel moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Methodist, 2(2), 112–130.
Rudyanto, A., & Siregar, S. V. (2018). The effect of stakeholder pressure and corporate governance on the sustainability report quality. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2017-0071.
Saputra, R. W., Gede, L., Dewi, K., Kualitas, D., Keberlanjutan, L., Dampak, :, Keuangan, K., Perusahaan, T. K., Perusahaan, U., & Perusahaan, U. (2025). Determinants of sustainability report quality: The impact of financial performance, corporate governance, firm size, and age. E-Jurnal Akuntansi. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2025.v35.i08.p02.
Silvana, & Khomsyiah. (2023). Pengaruh stakeholder pressure dan kinerja keuangan perusahaan terhadap sustainability report quality. In Journal of Mandalika Literature (Vol. 3, Issue 1).
Somany, N. (2023). Greenwashing in business: Examining the impact of deceptive environmental claims on consumer behavior and corporate accountability. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 08(04), 908–920. https://doi.org/10.46609/ijsser.2023.v08i04.024.
Sriningsih, S., & Wahyuningrum, I. F. S. (2022). Pengaruh comprehensive stakeholder pressure dan good corporate governance terhadap kualitas sustainability report. Owner, 6(1), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i1.680.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788.
Wulan, D. F. (2025). Stakeholder pressure and sustainability report quality in Indonesia. International Journal of Management and Human Sciences, 09(01), 01–13. https://doi.org/10.31674/ijmhs.2025.v09i01.001.
Yosua, A., & Tundjung, H. (2022). Pengaruh pemangku kepentingan dan pemegang saham terhadap kualitas laporan berkelanjutan. Jurnal Multiparadigma Akuntansi, IV.
Yuliandhari, W. S., & Citta, N. (2023). Pengaruh good corporate governance, tekanan pemegang saham, dan umur perusahaan terhadap kualitas sustainability report. Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 6(3), 3234–3248. https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v6i3.5082.
Yuliandhari, W. S., Asalam, A. G., & Sinatrya, M. V. (2022). Pengaruh tekanan pemegang saham dan umur perusahaan terhadap kualitas sustainability report. Owner, 7(1), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i1.1207.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kartika Suryanengsih, Maylia Pramono Sari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
