Aligning IT Strategy with Operational Performance: A Case Study of the Semarang-Demak Toll Road Project
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v12i2.6295Keywords:
Information Technology Strategy, Operational Performance, RFID, Infrastructure Management, Qualitative Case StudyAbstract
This study aims to provide an in-depth understanding of how Information Technology (IT) strategies are aligned with operational performance at PT PP Semarang Demak (PPSD), specifically regarding the implementation of the RFID-based Lajur Otomatis (LOS) system. Motivated by the need to manage traffic fluctuations and enhance service efficiency, the research employs a qualitative case study approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with key stakeholders from the Engineering, Operations, and Finance divisions, supplemented by direct field observations conducted between February and June 2024. The findings indicate that while the IT strategy is highly congruent with operational needs significantly reducing congestion and accelerating transaction speeds the integration process is hindered by technical and organizational barriers. Key challenges identified include limited human resource competency, environmental disruptions, and the financial risk of technology mismatch. The study concludes that sustainable alignment requires more than technical adoption; it demands rigorous validation mechanisms, such as Proof of Concept (PoC), and continuous investment in human capital. These insights offer valuable strategic implications for the construction and infrastructure sector regarding the effective management of digital transformation.
Downloads
References
Agar, J. (2020). What is technology?: Technology: Critical history of a concept, by Eric Schatzberg, Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 2018, 352 pp., $27.45 (paperback), ISBN: 978-0-226-58383-9. Annals of Science, 77(3), 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2019.1672788.
Agazu, B. G., & Kero, C. A. (2024). Innovation strategy and firm competitiveness: A systematic literature review. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00381-9.
Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Rubio-López, E. A. (2007). Proactive corporate environmental strategies: Myths and misunderstandings. Long Range Planning, 40(3), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2007.02.008.
Baden-Fuller, C., & Haefliger, S. (2013). Business models and technological innovation. Long Range Planning, 46(6), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.023.
Boothby, D., Dufour, A., & Tang, J. (2010). Technology adoption, training and productivity performance. Research Policy, 39(5), 650–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.011.
Bughin, J., Catlin, T., Hirt, M., & Willmott, P. (2018). Why digital strategies fail. McKinsey Quarterly, 1(1), 14–25.
Chavez, R., Yu, W., Gimenez, C., Fynes, B., & Wiengarten, F. (2015). Customer integration and operational performance: The mediating role of information quality. Decision Support Systems, 80, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.10.001.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE.
Efrat, K., Gilboa, S., & Yonatany, M. (2017). When marketing and innovation interact: The case of born-global firms. International Business Review, 26(2), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.09.006.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888.
Fahreza, R. R., Hananto, D., & Polinar, M. A. N. (2025). The effect of quality service and operational standard procedures on operational performance at CV Pabrik Tahu Sumedang. Transekonomika: Akuntansi, Bisnis dan Keuangan, 5(3), 767–786. https://doi.org/10.55047/transekonomika.v5i3.885.
Farida, I., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Business strategies and competitive advantage: The role of performance and innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030163.
Fosso Wamba, S., & Mishra, D. (2017). Big data integration with business processes: A literature review. Business Process Management Journal, 23(3), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-02-2017-0047.
Handoyo, S., Suharman, H., Ghani, E. K., & Soedarsono, S. (2023). A business strategy, operational efficiency, ownership structure, and manufacturing performance: The moderating role of market uncertainty and competition intensity and its implication on open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100039.
Huang, X. (2023). The roles of competition on innovation efficiency and firm performance: Evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 29(1), 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2022.100201.
Hwang, W.-S., & Kim, H.-S. (2022). Does the adoption of emerging technologies improve technical efficiency? Evidence from Korean manufacturing SMEs. Small Business Economics, 59(2), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00554-w.
Karstegl, N., Enjolras, M., & Mayer, F. (2025). Exploring innovation management systems: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 76, 101876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2025.101876.
Kochetkov, D. M. (2023). Innovation: A state-of-the-art review and typology. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 7(4), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2023.05.004.
Koentjoro, S., & Gunawan, S. (2020). Managing knowledge, dynamic capabilities, innovative performance, and creating sustainable competitive advantage in family companies: A case study of a family company in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6030090.
Koo, K., & Le, L. (2024). IT capability and innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 203, 123359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123359.
Lee, M., Yun, J. J., Pyka, A., Won, D., Kodama, F., Schiuma, G., Park, H., Jeon, J., Park, K., Jung, K., Yan, M.-R., Lee, S., & Zhao, X. (2018). How to respond to the fourth industrial revolution, or the second information technology revolution? Dynamic new combinations between technology, market, and society through open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc4030021.
Makhloufi, L., Azbiya Yaacob, N., Laghouag, A. A., Ali Sahli, A., & Belaid, F. (2021). Effect of IT capability and intangible IT resources on sustainable competitive advantage: Exploring moderating and mediating effects of IT flexibility and core competency. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1935665. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1935665.
Manjunath, C., Padigar, M., & Pedada, K. (2024). The role of digital orientation and strategic emphasis in creating brand competitiveness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 80, 103906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103906.
Nightingale, P. (2014). What is technology? Six definitions and two pathologies. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2743113.
Sutrisno, S., Ausat, A. M. A., Suherlan, S., & Rijal, S. (2024). Towards competitive advantage: Employee competency development strategies in promoting business innovation. Jurnal Penelitian Inovatif, 4(2), 601–608. https://doi.org/10.54082/jupin.369.
Trattner, A., Hvam, L., Forza, C., & Herbert-Hansen, Z. N. L. (2019). Product complexity and operational performance: A systematic literature review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 25, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2019.02.001.
Vărzaru, A. A., & Bocean, C. G. (2024). Digital transformation and innovation: The influence of digital technologies on turnover from innovation activities and types of innovation. Systems, 12(9), 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12090359.
Zabukovšek, U., Tominc, P., & Bobek, S. (2023). Business IT alignment impact on corporate sustainability. Sustainability, 15(16), 12519. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612519.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurcholis Kurniawan, Dessy Isfianadewi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
