Pengaruh Fraud Theory dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Satetement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v12i1.6040Keywords:
Triangle Fraud Theory, Manajerial Ownership, Fraudulent Financial StatementAbstract
This study aims to examine the influence of pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and managerial ownership on fraudulent financial statements, measured using the M-Score. Pressure is proxied by financial stability, opportunity by the nature of industry, and rationalization by TATA, which reflects the tendency for accrual-based manipulation. The study employs secondary data from companies in the energy and basic material sectors categorized as mining industries and listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period 2022–2024. The research population consists of 72 companies, and the analysis is conducted using panel data regression with EViews 13. The results indicate that pressure, opportunity, and rationalization have a positive and significant effect on fraudulent financial statements. These findings suggest that unstable financial conditions, industry characteristics that create opportunities for manipulation, and aggressive accrual practices increase the likelihood of financial statement fraud. Meanwhile, managerial ownership shows no significant effect, implying that managerial shareholding is not sufficient to reduce the risk of fraud. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the key drivers of fraudulent reporting and emphasizes the need for stronger governance mechanisms and fraud-risk oversight within mining companies that face high operational.
Downloads
References
Alkotdriyah, P. P., Harnovinsah, D., Djaddang, S., Mulyadi, J., & Lysandra, S. (2024). Determinan fraudulent financial statement: Peran komite audit sebagai pemoderasi. Kompartemen: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 22(1), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.30595/kompartemen.v22i1.21325.
Aprilia, S. R. N. A., & Furqani, A. (2021). Deteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan dengan metode fraud diamond pada perusahaan jasa. Journal of Accounting And Financial Issue. https://doi.org/10.24929/jafis.v2i2.1661.
Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., & Hogan, C. E. (2017). Auditing and assurance services (16th ed.). Pearson.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2024). Occupational fraud 2024: A report to the nations.
Beneish, M., Lee, C. M., & Nichols, C. (2013). Earnings manipulation and expected returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 69(2). https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v69.n2.1.
Cahyani, A. S., & Arifin, J. (2025). Does corporate governance and political connections influence the potential for financial statement fraud? Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 28(2), 2024. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol28.i.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: A study of the social psychology of embezzlement. Patterson Smith.
Fouziah, S. N., Suratno, & Djaddang, S. (2022). Relevansi teori fraud hexagon dalam mendeteksi fraudulent financial statement pada perusahaan sektor perbankan. Substansi: Sumber Artikel Akuntansi, Auditing, Dan Keuangan Vokasi, 6, 59–77. https://doi.org/10.35837/subs.v6i1.1525.
Hidayah, N., & Sayekti, F. N. (2023). The detection of fraud: How do financial stability and financial distress affect fraudulent financial report? Jurnal Informasi, Perpajakan, Akuntansi, Dan Keuangan Publik, 18(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.25105/jipak.v18i2.16863.
Idawati, W., Prabowo, H. S., Pratiwi, A. R., & Simatupang, B. M. (2024). Influencing factors on sustainability reporting quality based on sustainable development goals (SDGs) considering Covid-19. Business: Theory and Practice, 25(2), 509–522. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2024.19579.
Inayah, J. Z., & Chariri, A. (2024). The determinants of financial statement fraud: Fraud pentagon perspective. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 19–34. https://doi.org/10.17977/um004v11i12024p019.
Indriani, N., & Rohman, A. (2022). Fraud triangle dan kecurangan laporan keuangan dengan model Beneish M-score. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 20(1).
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 4, 305–360.
Khomariah, O. A., & Khomsiyah. (2023). Pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial, kinerja keuangan, dan kualitas audit terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(4), 3610–3620. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i4.1734.
Natalia, E., & Kuang, T. M. (2023). Pengujian fraud triangle theory dalam menjelaskan kecurangan laporan keuangan menggunakan Beneish M-score. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(2), 1752–1764. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i2.1296.
Nathania, F. (2024). Unveiling the motivation of fraudulent financial statement in ENVY: Fraud triangle theory. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 8(1), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v8i1.1923.
Nugroho, D., & Diyanty, V. (2022). Hexagon fraud in fraudulent financial statement: The moderating role of audit committee. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 19(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2022.03.
Nurbaiti, A., & Putri, A. A. (2023). Mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan menggunakan teori fraud hexagon. Jurnal Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(1), 2023–2215. https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v6i1.359.
Pradana, E. H. P., & Suwasono, H. (2024). Analisis pengaruh fraud pentagon terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan: Studi empiris pada perusahaan LQ45 tahun 2018-2022. Journal of Accounting and Digital Finance, 4(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.53088/jadfi.v4i1.916.
Pratiwi, W. P., Adelia Permata Putri, & Nuryadin. (2024). Factors affecting financial statement fraud in food & beverage sub-sector companies. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 11(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.55963/jraa.v11i1.641.
Probohudono, A. N., Lubis, A. T., Nahartyo, E., & Arifah, S. (2022). Governance structure and the tendency to do financial statements fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 26(1), 2022. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol26.i.
Puspitasari, H. P., & Harto, P. (2024). Pengaruh determinan fraud hexagon theory dalam mendeteksi fraudulent financial statement. Jurnal Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 7(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v7i2.577.
Rahayu, I. Y., & Susilowati, E. (2025). Presepsi teori fraud hexagon terhadap fraudulent financial statement. Jambura Economic Education Journal, 373–389. https://doi.org/10.37479/jeej.v7i1.26342.
Rahmawati, A. M., & Juliarto, A. (2025). Does management entrenchment influence fraudulent financial statement? Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(1), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v9i1.2403.
Reskino, & Bilkis, M. S. (2022). Apakah good corporate governance memoderasi hubungan kecenderungan kecurangan manajemen terhadap fraudulent financial statement? Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 6(2), 2579–9975. https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.v6i2.7471.
Setyono, D., Hariyanto, E., Wahyuni, S., & Pratama, B. C. (2023). Penggunaan fraud hexagon dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(2), 1036–1048. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i2.1325.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x.
Sudarmanto, E., Aulia, T. Z., & Siregar, I. G. (2025). Investigating the effectiveness of independent commissioners in reducing fraud hexagon-induced financial statement fraud. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(R2), 2025.
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128.
Widyaningsih, A., & Nugroho, A. H. D. (2022). Mendeteksi fraud pentagon terhadap fraudulent financial reporting menggunakan model Beneish M-score pada perusahaan manufaktur. Journal of Management & Business, 5(2), 2022–2384. https://doi.org/10.37531/sejaman.v5i2.2218.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jasmine Eirene, Prita Karina Diandra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
