Determinan Opini Audit Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota di Sumatera Selatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v12i1.5753Keywords:
Audit Findings, Follow-Up of Examination Results, Locally-Generated Revenue, Regional Expenditure, Audit OpinionsAbstract
Transparent and accountable regional financial management is a key focus in implementing good governance. A crucial instrument in providing financial management is the audit of financial statements by the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK), specifically the audit opinion, which is used as an indicator of the quality of regional government financial governance. The audit opinion reflects compliance with government accounting standards. However, some regions still experience fluctuations in audit opinions from year to year. The goal of the study is to determine how auditing works, how long it takes to complete an audit, how much land is available, and how much land is worth. This study covered 17 districts and cities in Sumatera Selatan between 2018 and 2022. Saturasi sampel is used for sampling, and the total number of samples is 155. Agency theory is used to explain the relationship between agents and directors. Logistic regression is used in data analysis. The analysis revealed that audit findings significantly negatively impacted the audit opinion. The greater the number of findings, the lower the quality of the financial statements and the potential for a lower audit opinion. However, the audit opinion was not determined by follow-up on audit findings, local revenue, or regional expenditure. Audit follow-up had no effect, but showed a positive trend, indicating that follow-up remains important even though it does not directly affect the audit opinion. Meanwhile, local revenue and regional expenditure had no significant effect and showed a negative trend, indicating that improvements in revenue and expenditure management do not guarantee an improvement in the audit opinion. The research's implications indicate that to increase public trust in financial management, local governments need to follow up on audit findings on local revenue and spending as a form of accountability to the public for any indications of state financial losses. The research also has a significant impact on explaining local governments' performance in managing their finances.
Downloads
References
Abimanyu, P. R., Martini, R., & Indriasari, D. (2024). Summary of audit judgment from auditor experience, task complexity, professional skepticism, and goal orientation. International Journal of Research in Vocational Studies (IJRVOCAS), 4(2), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.53893/ijrvocas.v4i2.314.
Alal Maula, M. I., & Wibowo, P. (2022). Meneropong determinan opini LKPD kabupaten/kota di Sumatera Utara. Bina Ekonomi, 26(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.26593/be.v26i1.5341.23-37.
Ali, M. M., Hariyati, T., Pratiwi, M. Y., & Afifah, S. (2022). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif dan penerapannya dalam penelitian. Education Journal, 2(2), 1–6.
Apriani, R., Yulsiati, H., & Aryani Antina, Y. (2024). Ukuran pemerintahan daerah terhadap opini audit pemerintahan. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis [atau nama jurnal terkait], 5(1).
Fatimah, D., Sari, R. N., & Rasuli, M. (2014). Pengaruh sistem pengendalian intern, kepatuhan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, opini audit tahun sebelumnya dan umur pemerintah daerah terhadap penerimaan opini Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian pada Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah di seluruh Indonesia. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Riau, 3(1), 1–15.
Fitriana, L., Apandi, R. N. N., & Widarsono, A. (2025). Pengaruh aspek finansial dan kinerja non finansial terhadap opini audit pada pemerintahan daerah kabupaten dan kota di Republik Indonesia. SINERGI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 2(1), 427–447. https://doi.org/10.62335/hh99t112.
Fuad, S. (2013). Pengelolaan LKP pada masa pandemik Covid-19. Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.33369/joll.4.1.15-22.
Garsuarani Octavianti Ningsih, & Sugiharti Binastuti. (2021). The effect of audit findings and recommendation follow ups of BPK-RI’s evaluation on local government’s performance in districts/cities East Java Province. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 2(4), 1340–1345. https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v2i4.282.
Ge, R., & Zhang, J. J. (2017). Regulatory investigations of audit partners and audit quality improvement. China Journal of Accounting Studies, 5(3), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2017.1375647.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Pembelajaran Statistika Menggunakan Software SPSS untuk Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas. Universitas Diponegoro.
Harber, M., & Marx, B. (2020). Audit quality and independence concerns in the South African audit industry: Contrasting views. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 34(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2019.1667646.
Harber, M., Duboisée de Ricquebourg, A., & Maroun, W. (2024). Costs and benefits of mandatory audit firm rotation: Initial engagement experience of audit committee chairs and engagement partners. Accounting Forum, 48(1), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2022.2130812.
Hay, D., & Cordery, C. J. (2021). Evidence about the value of financial statement audit in the public sector. Public Money and Management, 41(4), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1729532.
Indriani, D., Tinangon, J. J., & Budiarso, N. S. (2024). The impact of audit findings and follow-up actions on audit recommendations on audit opinions of financial statements with APIP capabilities as a moderating variable (A study on provincial/regencies/cities governments in Suluttenggo Region). The Contrarian: Finance, Accounting, and Business Research, 3(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.58784/cfabr.159.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Dalam The Corporate Financiers (Vol. 3, hlm. 305–360). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137341280.0038.
Johnson, L. A. (2006). The effect of audit scope and auditor tenure on resource allocation decisions in local government audit engagements. Accounting Forum, 30(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2006.01.002.
Kartika, A. D., & Yohanes, S. (2013). Pengaruh penerapan Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan dan kualitas aparatur pemerintah daerah terhadap kualitas laporan keuangan (Studi kasus pada Pemerintah Kota Tual). Jurnal STIE Semarang, 5(3), 93–111.
Kasmir. (2019). Analisis Laporan Keuangan (Edisi 1, Cetakan 12). Rajawali Pers.
Li, L., Qi, B., Robin, A., & Yang, R. (2022). The effect of enforcement action on audit fees and the audit reporting lag. Accounting and Business Research, 52(1), 38–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2020.1808441.
Martini, R., Zulkifli, Z., Sulaiman, S., Sari, K. R., Hartati, S., & Pratiwi, T. A. (2023). Impact of the Village Fund Policy on community economic empowerment during the Covid-19 pandemic. IJEBD (International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development), 6(2), 278–284. https://doi.org/10.29138/ijebd.v6i2.2169.
Meinarsih, T., Suratman, A., & Hidayati, N. (2020). The effect of application of accrual-based government accounting standards, apparatus quality, public accountability and government internal control systems on quality of financial statements. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 5(8), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt20aug142.
Mutiara, R., Masnila, N., & Nurhasanah. (2022). Pengaruh kelemahan sistem pengendalian intern, ketidakpatuhan pada perundang-undangan dan tindak lanjut rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan terhadap opini audit pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik, 33(1), 1–12.
Nugroho, D., Sasongko, N., & Dwi Bayu Bawono, A. (2023). The influence of audit findings, auditor change, local government size, leverage and SILPA on BPK audit opinions of local governments in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Health, 2(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.58860/ijsh.v2i1.20.
Pamungkas, B., Ibtida, R., & Avrian, C. (2018). Factors influencing audit opinion of the Indonesian municipal governments’ financial statements. Cogent Business and Management, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1540256.
Paramita, P. D., et al. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif (Edisi 3). STIE Widya Gama Lumajang.
Rahmi, M., & Ariani, N. E. (2021). Pengaruh temuan audit dan tindak lanjut rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan terhadap opini atas laporan keuangan pemerintah kabupaten/kota di Provinsi Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 5(4), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.24815/jimeka.v5i4.15851.
Riadi. (2016). Pengaruh akuntabilitas, pengetahuan, dan pengalaman pegawai negeri sipil beserta kelompok masyarakat (pokmas) terhadap kualitas pengelola dana kelurahan di lingkungan Kecamatan Langkapura. Jurnal Ekonomi, 21(3), 311.
Riana Mayasari. (2022). Lemahnya signifikansi sistem pengendalian internal untuk peningkatan kualitas laporan keuangan pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Riset dan Aplikasi: Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 6(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.33795/jraam.v6i1.011.
Ritonga, I. T., & Suyanto, S. (2022). Impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on the audit of local government financial statements: Experience from Indonesia. Public Money and Management, 42(6), 452–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1964770.
Robu, I. B., Aevoae, G. M., Mardiros, D. N., & Herghiligiu, I. V. (2025). Mergers & acquisition decisions in the energy sector based on financial transparency and audit opinions. Eastern European Economics, 63(2), 297–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2023.2225484.
Rumihin, R., Ahuluheluw, N., & Leiwakabessy, T. F. F. (2021). Pengaruh karakteristik pemerintah daerah terhadap opini audit atas laporan keuangan pada kab/kota di Provinsi Maluku Tahun 2016-2018. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(11), 1–13.
Saeedi, A. (2023). A high-dimensional approach to predicting audit opinions. Applied Economics, 55(33), 3807–3832. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2118224.
Salsabila, R., & Wahyudi, I. (2022). Pengaruh temuan audit, rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan, dan ukuran pemerintahan daerah terhadap opini audit pada pemerintah daerah di Indonesia. AKSELERASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional, 4(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.54783/jin.v4i1.515.
Sari, A. P., Martani, D., & Setyaningrum, D. (2015). Pengaruh temuan audit, tindak lanjut hasil pemeriksaan dan kualitas sumber daya manusia terhadap opini audit melalui tingkat pengungkapan laporan keuangan. Jurnal Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVIII.
Sari, D. N., & Darmastuti, D. (2023). Internal control weaknesses: Its relationship with local government characteristics and follow-up on audit results. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 27(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol27.iss1.art10.
Setyaningrum Ismi, L. (2024). Pengaruh pemanfaatan teknologi informasi, sistem pengendalian intern, kapasitas sumber daya manusia terhadap kualitas laporan keuangan pemerintah daerah dengan komitmen organisasi sebagai variabel moderating (Studi kasus OPD Kota Palu). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 13(4), 1–15.
Simanjuntak, H. Y., Agustiawan, & Putri, A. M. (2023). Pengaruh sistem pengendalian intern dan ketidakpatuhan pada peraturan perundang-undangan (Studi pada BPK Perwakilan Provinsi Riau). Accounting and Management Journal, 7(1), 95–107.
Sousa. (2014). Penggunaan variabel dummy untuk meningkatkan nilai determinasi faktor eksternal terukur terhadap durasi. JMTS: Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil, 1(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmts.v1i2.2663.
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Bisnis: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sutaryo, Naviantia, I. A., & Muhtar. (2020). Audit opinion on government financial report: Evidence from local governments in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Management, 14(1), 129–144.
Syam, J., Azlina, N., & Rasuli, M. (2023). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi opini audit laporan keuangan pemerintah daerah dengan tindak lanjut rekomendasi sebagai variabel moderasi. Prosiding Konferensi Riset Akuntansi Riau, 1(1), 240–262.
Tsipouridou, M., & Spathis, C. (2014). Audit opinion and earnings management: Evidence from Greece. Accounting Forum, 38(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2013.09.002.
Yusuf, M., & Gustiana, N. (2022). Pengaruh sistem pengendalian internal dan kepatuhan terhadap opini audit pemerintah pusat dengan rekomendasi audit sebagai variabel moderasi. RELEVAN: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 3(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.35814/relevan.v3i1.4147.
Zdolšek, D., Jagrič, T., & Kolar, I. (2022). Auditor’s going-concern opinion prediction: The case of Slovenia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1888766.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muamar Wiralaksana, Rita Martini, Maria Maria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
