Published: 2023-02-06
Apakah Nilai Perusahaan, Profitabilitas dan Leverage Berpengaruh Pada Agresivitas Pajak?
DOI: 10.35870/jemsi.v9i1.903
Abstract
Terdapat pandangan yang berbeda tentang implikasi nilai perusahaan, profitabilitas dan leverage terhadap agresivitas pajak. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengeksplorasi hubungan nilai perusahaan, profitabilitas dan leverage terhadap agresivitas pajak di Indonesia. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah perusahan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dari tahun 2017 sampai dengan 2021. Dengan menggunakan purposive sampling method untuk penarikan sampel, maka diperoleh 1706 perusahaan yang diteliti. Penelitian kuantitatif ini menggunakan regresi panel data dengan GLS fixed-effect model untuk mengetahui pengaruh nilai perusahaan, profitabilitas dan leverage terhadap agresivitas pajak. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya hubungan yang signifikan negatif antara nilai perusahaan dengan agresivitas pajak di Indonesia. Namun sebaliknya terdapat hubungan signifikan positif pada variabel profitabilitas dan agresivitas pajak. Demikian juga dengan variabel leverage dan agresivitas yang menunjukkan hubungan signifikan positif. Hasil tersebut disimpulkan dengan menggunakan robust standard error pada analisa regresi panel data. Dengan adanya penelitian ini maka akan menambah kontribusi studi empiris terhadap penelitian berikutnya yang menggunakan variabel yang sama.
Keywords
Agresivitas Pajak; Leverage; Nilai Perusahaan; Profitabilitas
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the JEMSI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi). The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023)
-
Section: Articles
-
Published: 2023-02-06
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2023 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/jemsi.v9i1.903
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem.
No author biographies available.
-
Adi Prawira, I. F., & Sandria, J. (2021). The Determinants of Corporate Tax Aggressiveness. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i4.4482
-
Arora, T. S., & Gill, S. (2022). Impact of corporate tax aggressiveness on firm value: Evidence from India. Managerial Finance, 48(2), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-01-2021-0033
-
[Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.02.003
-
Cook, K. A., Moser, W. J., & Omer, T. C. (2017). Tax avoidance and ex ante cost of capital. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 44(7–8), 1109–1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12258
-
De Bandt, O., & Davis, E. P. (2000). Competition, contestability and market structure in European banking sectors on the eve of EMU. Journal of Banking & Finance, 24(6), 1045–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00117-X
-
Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2009). Corporate Tax Avoidance and Firm Value. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.3.537
-
Deslandes, M., Fortin, A., & Landry, S. (2019). Audit committee characteristics and tax aggressiveness. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(2), 272–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2018-2109
-
Drake, K. D., Lusch, S. J., & Stekelberg, J. (2019). Does Tax Risk Affect Investor Valuation of Tax Avoidance? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 34(1), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X17692674
-
Ejeh, B. U., & Salaudeen, Y. M. (2018). Equity ownership structure and corporate tax aggressiveness: The Nigerian context. Pressacademia, 5(2), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.828
-
Gaaya, S., Lakhal, N., & Lakhal, F. (2017). Does family ownership reduce corporate tax avoidance? The moderating effect of audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(7), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-02-2017-1530
-
Graham, J. R., & Tucker, A. L. (2006). Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(3), 563–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.002
-
Hanlon, M., & Slemrod, J. (2009). What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1–2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.09.004
-
Huang, W., Ying, T., & Shen, Y. (2018). Executive cash compensation and tax aggressiveness of Chinese firms. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 51(4), 1151–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0700-2
-
Jin, X. (2021). Corporate tax aggressiveness and capital structure decisions: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 75, 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.04.008
-
Kamarudin, F., Sufian, F., & Md. Nassir, A. (2016). Does country governance foster revenue efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks in GCC countries? EuroMed Journal of Business, 11(2), 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-06-2015-0026
-
Kamasa, K., Nortey, D. N., Boateng, F., & Bonuedi, I. (2022). Impact of tax reforms on revenue mobilisation in developing economies: Empirical evidence from Ghana. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-01-2022-0011
-
Kubick, T. R., & Lockhart, G. B. (2017). Corporate tax aggressiveness and the maturity structure of debt. Advances in Accounting, 36, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.10.001
-
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2011). The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.003
-
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), 86–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.10.006
-
Oktavianna, R. (2021). Pengaruh Agresivitas Pajak Dan Growth Opportunity Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Corporate Social Responsibility Sebagai Moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Bisnis, Vol. 14 No. 2 (2021), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.35143/jakb.v14i2.5022
-
Ortas, E., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2020). Bridging the gap between corporate social responsibility performance and tax aggressiveness: The moderating role of national culture. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(4), 825–855. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2017-2896
-
Prastiwi, D., & Walidah, A. N. (2020). Pengaruh agresivitas pajak terhadap nilai perusahaan: Efek moderasi transparansi dan kepemilikan institusional. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 23(2), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v23i2.2997
-
Pratama, I., & Suryarini, T. (2020). The Role of Independent Commissioners in Moderating the Effect of Capital Intensity, Inventory Intensity, and Profitability on Tax Aggressiveness. Accounting Analysis Journal, 9(3), 208–214.
-
Putra, E. P. (2022, December 5). DJB Jakut Tangani Kasus Penggelapan Pajak PT PR Senilai Rp 292 Miliar. Republika. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/rmxalt484/djb-jakut-tangani-kasus-penggelapan-pajak-pt-pr-senilai-rp-292-miliar
-
Richardson, G., Lanis, R., & Leung, S. C.-M. (2014). Corporate tax aggressiveness, outside directors, and debt policy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.010
-
Yanti, L. D., & Hartono, L. (2019). Effect of Leverage, Profitability and Company Size on Tax Aggressiveness. (Empirical Study: Subsector Manufacturing Companies Food, Beverage, Cosmetics and Household Purposes Manufacturing Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for 2014-2017). ECo-Fin, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.32877/ef.v1i1.52
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.