Published: 2026-08-01
How Financial Literacy Moderate The Herding Behavior, Social Media, and FOMO to Investment Decision Crypto in Gen Z
DOI: 10.35870/jemsi.v12i4.6749
Riyan Hidayat, Mustaruddin Mustaruddin, Mochammad Ridwan Ristyawan, Giriati Giriati, Uray Ndaru Mustika
- Riyan Hidayat: Tanjungpura University
- Mustaruddin Mustaruddin: Tanjungpura University
- Mochammad Ridwan Ristyawan: Tanjungpura University
- Giriati Giriati: Tanjungpura University
- Uray Ndaru Mustika: Tanjungpura University
Article Metrics
- Scopus Citations
- Google Scholar
- Crossref Citations
- Semantic Scholar
- DataCite Metrics
-
If the link doesn't work, copy the DOI or article title for manual search (API Maintenance).
Abstract
The rapid increase in cryptocurrency adoption among Generation Z in Indonesia has raised concerns regarding investment decision-making in highly volatile digital asset markets. This study examines the influence of herding behavior, social media exposure, and fear of missing out (FOMO) on cryptocurrency investment decisions, with financial literacy as a moderating variable. A quantitative approach was employed using survey data from 200 Generation Z cryptocurrency investors in Pontianak City. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4. The results show that herding behavior and social media significantly influence investment decisions. Fear of missing out also affects investor decision-making. Financial literacy moderates the relationship between herding behavior and investment decisions as well as between social media and investment decisions, but does not moderate the relationship between FOMO and investment decisions. These findings indicate that cryptocurrency investment decisions among Generation Z are influenced by social interactions and emotional biases.
Keywords
Behavioral Finance; Financial Literacy; Crypto Investment Decision
Peer Review Process
This article has undergone a double-blind peer review process to ensure quality and impartiality.
Indexing Information
Discover where this journal is indexed at our indexing page.
Open Science Badges
This journal supports transparency in research and encourages authors to meet criteria for Open Science Badges.
How to Cite
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the JEMSI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi). The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 12 No. 4 (2026)
-
Section: Articles
-
Published: 2026-08-01
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2026 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/jemsi.v12i4.6749
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem.
Riyan Hidayat, Tanjungpura University
Management, Faculty Economics and Business, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia.
Mustaruddin Mustaruddin, Tanjungpura University
Management, Faculty Economics and Business, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia.
Mochammad Ridwan Ristyawan, Tanjungpura University
Management, Faculty Economics and Business, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia.
Giriati Giriati, Tanjungpura University
Management, Faculty Economics and Business, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia.
-
Abakah, E. J. A., Adeabah, D., Tiwari, A. K., & Abdullah, M. (2023). Effect of Russia–Ukraine war sentiment on blockchain and FinTech stocks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102948.
-
Adil, M., Singh, Y., & Ansari, M. S. (2022). How financial literacy moderate the association between behaviour biases and investment decision? Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 7(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-09-2020-0086.
-
Ahmad, M., & Wu, Q. (2022). Does herding behavior matter in investment management and perceived market efficiency? Evidence from an emerging market. Management Decision, 60(8), 2148–2173. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2020-0867.
-
Almansour, B. Y., Elkrghli, S., & Almansour, A. Y. (2023). Behavioral finance factors and investment decisions: A mediating role of risk perception. Cogent Economics and Finance, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2239032.
-
Almeida, J., & Gonçalves, T. C. (2023). A systematic literature review of investor behavior in the cryptocurrency markets. In Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance (Vol. 37). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100785.
-
Aloosh, A., Ouzan, S., & Shahzad, S. J. H. (2022). Bubbles across Meme Stocks and Cryptocurrencies. Finance Research Letters, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103155.
-
Altaf, H., & Jan, A. (2023). Generational theory of behavioral biases in investment behavior. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(4), 834–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2023.02.002.
-
-
Ateş, S., Coşkun, A., Şahin, M. A., & Demircan, M. L. (2016). Impact of Financial Literacy on the Behavioral Biases of Individual Stock Investors: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Business and Economics Research Journal, 7(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2016321805.
-
Bikas, E., Jurevičienė, D., Dubinskas, P., & Novickytė, L. (2013). Behavioural Finance: The Emergence and Development Trends. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 870–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.363.
-
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5). https://about.jstor.org/terms.
-
Choi, K. H., & Yoon, S. M. (2020). Investor sentiment and herding behavior in the korean stock market. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs8020034.
-
Fadillah, M. F., & Patrisia, D. (2025). The Effect of Heuristic Bias and Herding Bias on Investment Decisions with Financial Literacy as a Moderating Variable in Gen Z. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(6), 2681–2690. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i6.249.
-
Friederich, F., Meyer, J. H., Matute, J., & Palau-Saumell, R. (2023). CRYPTO-MANIA: How fear-of-missing-out drives consumers’ (risky) investment decisions. Psychology and Marketing, 41, 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21906.
-
-
Hair., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7.
-
Ju, X. K. (2020). Herding behaviour of Chinese A- and B-share markets. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 27(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-03-2019-0022.
-
Kaddouhah, M. (2024). An economic definition of ‘Fear of Missing Out’ (FOMO). Finance Research Letters, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105344.
-
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). PROSPECT THEORY: AN ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK. Econometrica, 47(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.
-
Lee, G., & Ryu, D. (2025). Fear of missing out and cryptocurrency miners: Evidence from Dogecoin and Litecoin. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2025.101059.
-
Lee, K., & Jeong, D. (2023). Too much is too bad: The effect of media coverage on the price volatility of cryptocurrencies. Journal of International Money and Finance, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2023.102823.
-
Li, S., & Ma, J. (2024). The impact of sentiment and engagement of Twitter posts on cryptocurrency price movement. Finance Research Letters, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105598.
-
-
Mahmood, F., Arshad, R., Khan, S., Afzal, A., & Bashir, M. (2024). Impact of behavioral biases on investment decisions and the moderation effect of financial literacy; an evidence of Pakistan. Acta Psychologica, 247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104303.
-
Martaningrat, N. W. S., & Kurniawan, Y. (2024). The Impact of Financial Influencers, Social Influencers, and FOMO Economy on the Decision-Making of Investment on Millennial Generation and Gen Z of Indonesia. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(3), 1319–1335. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i3.3604.
-
Meyer, E. A., Sandner, P., Cloutier, B., & Welpe, I. M. (2023). High on Bitcoin: Evidence of emotional contagion in the YouTube crypto influencer space. Journal of Business Research, 164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113850.
-
Nguyen, A. P. N., Mai, T. T., Bezbradica, M., & Crane, M. (2023). Volatility and returns connectedness in cryptocurrency markets: Insights from graph-based methods. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.129349.
-
Osman, M. Ben, Urom, C., Guesmi, K., & Benkraiem, R. (2024). Economic sentiment and the cryptocurrency market in the post-COVID-19 era. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102962.
-
Poudel, A., Bhusal, S., & Datt Pathak, D. (2024). Behaviour Bias and Investment Decision in Nepalese Investors. International Journal of Business and Management, 19(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v19n2p85.
-
Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., Dehaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014.
-
Rijanto, B. P., & Utami, N. (2024). Financial technology, social media influencers, and experience of cryptocurrency investment decisions: Financial literacy’s role. Jurnal Manajemen Maranatha, 23(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.28932/jmm.v23i2.8717.
-
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68.
-
Silva, P. V. J. da G., Klotzle, M. C., Pinto, A. C. F., & Gomes, L. L. (2019). Herding behavior and contagion in the cryptocurrency market. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 22, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2019.01.006.
-
-
-
Wang, J. N., Liu, H. C., Lee, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. T. (2023). FoMO in the Bitcoin market: Revisiting and factors. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 89, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2023.04.007.
-
Warkulat, S., & Pelster, M. (2024). Social media attention and retail investor behavior: Evidence from r/wallstreetbets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103721.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.