Igniting Intrapreneurial Sparks: Transforming Non-Business Students through Constructivist ENTRE Learning at Universitas Negeri Medan

Authors

  • Ali Fikri Hasibuan Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Aprinawati Aprinawati Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Joko Suharianto Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v12i3.6500

Keywords:

Entrepreneurship Education, Constructivism, ENTRE Model, Non-Entrepreneurship Study Programs, Teaching Materials

Abstract

The development of entrepreneurship teaching materials tailored for non-entrepreneurship study programs is a strategic approach to fostering entrepreneurial mindsets and skills among students from diverse academic disciplines. This study aimed to design and evaluate entrepreneurship teaching materials based on a constructivist approach, integrating the ENTRE model, which combines theoretical and practical components. Employing a mixed-methods Research and Development (R&D) methodology with the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation), the developed module emphasized active learning, problem-solving, and real-world applications, addressing the needs of Community Education students at Universitas Negeri Medan. Validation by experts, practicality assessments by lecturers and students, and effectiveness evaluations through learning outcome tests and interviews demonstrated that the module was valid (average score 4.2), practical (average score 4.0), and effective (test score improvement p < 0.001). Qualitative findings revealed enhanced engagement, creativity, and entrepreneurial mindset transformation, overcoming initial challenges such as unfamiliarity with business terminology. This study provides a framework for integrating entrepreneurship education into non-entrepreneurship curricula, promoting intrapreneurial and entrepreneurial competencies relevant to the Indonesian higher education context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ali Fikri Hasibuan, Universitas Negeri Medan

    Program Studi Kewirausahaan, Fakakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan, Indonesia.

  • Aprinawati Aprinawati, Universitas Negeri Medan

    Program Studi Kewirausahaan, Fakakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan, Indonesia.

  • Joko Suharianto, Universitas Negeri Medan

    Program Studi Ilmu Ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan, Indonesia.

References

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Connor, C. O., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. Qualitative Research, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano, C. V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Kuratko, D. F., & Morris, M. H. (2018). Entrepreneurship and innovation in the new economy. Wiley.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Löbler, H. (2006). Learning entrepreneurship from a constructivist perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(1), 19–38.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Neck, H. M., Greene, P. G., & Brush, C. G. (2014). Teaching entrepreneurship: A practice-based approach. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782540564.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., Hoagwood, K., Angeles, L., & Northwest, K. P. (2016). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.

Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.

Rahman, H., Hasibuan, A. F., Syah, D. H., & Sagala, G. H. (2022). Intrapreneurship: As the outcome of entrepreneurship education among business students. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2149004.

Smith, J., & Jones, K. (2023). Digital tools in entrepreneurship education: A review. Journal of Business Education, 50(02), 89–102.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hasibuan, A. F., Aprinawati, A., & Suharianto, J. (2026). Igniting Intrapreneurial Sparks: Transforming Non-Business Students through Constructivist ENTRE Learning at Universitas Negeri Medan. JEMSI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi), 12(3), 2733-2740. https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v12i3.6500