Published: 2026-02-01
Evaluasi Pelatihan Non-Teknis Menggunakan Model Kirkpatrick: Systematic Literature Review 2016–2025
DOI: 10.35870/jemsi.v12i1.5978
Nicholas Brima Pradhika
- Nicholas Brima Pradhika: Universitas Paramadina
Article Metrics
- Scopus Citations
- Google Scholar
- Crossref Citations
- Semantic Scholar
- DataCite Metrics
-
If the link doesn't work, copy the DOI or article title for manual search (API Maintenance).
Abstract
Training evaluation is a crucial component in assessing the effectiveness of human resource development programs, particularly non-technical training that emphasizes attitudes, behaviors, and values. This study aims to examine the application and effectiveness of the Kirkpatrick Four-Level Evaluation Model in the context of non-technical training through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach. The research method employed an SLR based on the PRISMA guideline by analyzing 25 scholarly articles published between 2016 and 2025, obtained from both national and international databases. The results indicate that Level 1 (Reaction) and Level 2 (Learning) are the most dominantly applied evaluation levels, whereas the implementation of Level 3 (Behavior) and Level 4 (Results) remains relatively limited due to constraints in long-term observation and organizational data support. These findings confirm that the Kirkpatrick model remains relevant for evaluating non-technical training; however, it requires the strengthening of behavioral and results indicators to ensure that training impacts can be measured more comprehensively. This study provides practical implications for training providers in designing evaluations that are oriented toward behavioral change and medium-term impact.
Keywords
Kirkpatrick Model; Training Evaluation; Non-Technical Training; Systematic Literature Review; Soft Skills
Peer Review Process
This article has undergone a double-blind peer review process to ensure quality and impartiality.
Indexing Information
Discover where this journal is indexed at our indexing page.
Open Science Badges
This journal supports transparency in research and encourages authors to meet criteria for Open Science Badges.
How to Cite
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the JEMSI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi). The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026)
-
Section: Articles
-
Published: 2026-02-01
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2026 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/jemsi.v12i1.5978
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem.
No author biographies available.
-
Alsalamah, A., & Callinan, C. (2021). The Kirkpatrick model for training evaluation: Bibliometric analysis after 60 years (1959–2020). Industrial and Commercial Training, 54(1), 36–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-12-2020-0115.
-
Andriani, W. (2022). Penggunaan metode sistematik literatur review dalam penelitian ilmu sosiologi. Jurnal PTK dan Pendidikan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.18592/ptk.v7i2.5632.
-
Cahapay, M. (2021). Kirkpatrick model: Its limitations as used in higher education evaluation. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(1), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.856143.
-
-
-
Dwiwarman, D. A. (2024). Strategi pengembangan sumber daya manusia melalui keterampilan soft skills dan hard skills. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 13(2), 1538–1549. https://doi.org/10.33395/jmp.v13i2.14119.
-
Ermawan, A., & Saragih, E. H. (2022). Evaluasi dan penyempurnaan praktik pelatihan fire drill dengan 4 level Kirkpatrick pada Aston Priority Simatupang. Journal of Emerging Business Management and Entrepreneurship Studies, 2(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.34149/jebmes.v2i1.58.
-
Faizin, A., & Kusumaningrum, H. (2023). Review model-model evaluasi program untuk pendidikan dan pelatihan online. EduManajerial, 1(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.15408/em.v1i1.32245.
-
-
Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and open synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230.
-
Haqiki Noviar, M., Syarif, H., Rahmawati, E., Kunci, K., Pelatihan, E., Kirkpatrick, M., Arsip, M., Pusbangkom, S., Legislatif, S., Jenderal, D., Ri, J., Jenderal, G., & Subroto, J. (2024). Penerapan model Kirkpatrick level reaksi untuk evaluasi program pelatihan manajemen arsip dinamis di Pusbangkom SDM Legislatif Setjen DPR RI. Jurnal Kewidyaiswaraan, 9(1).
-
Hariyani, N. (2023). Efektivitas pelatihan literasi keuangan bagi rumah tangga petani. Jurnal AgroSainTa: Widyaiswara Mandiri Membangun Bangsa, 6(2), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.51589/ags.v6i2.3134.
-
-
-
Irawan, A., Hidayah, H. N., & Wildah, A. (2021). Evaluasi pelatihan teknik penanaman cempaka berdasarkan teori The Four Levels Kirkpatrick. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.17977/um052v12i2p64-70.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Mahfud, T., Setyawati, R., Kusuma, B. J., Dwiningrum, N. R., & Basri, B. (2023). Model evaluasi Kirkpatrick pada program Bina Desa: Penguatan bisnis kuliner kader Pemberdayaan Kesejahteraan Keluarga (PKK). Journal of Applied Community Engagement, 3(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.52158/jace.v3i1.631.
-
-
Millia Windhy, A., & Naibaho, T. T. (2022). Evaluasi efektivitas pelatihan tematik padi lahan rawa dengan metode Kirkpatrick pembelajaran. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Agribisnis (JEPA), 1. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jepa.2022.006.01.1.
-
-
Naibaho, T. T. (2023). Efektivitas pelatihan kewirausahaan bagi petani wilayah program READSI di Kabupaten Sambas. Jurnal AgroSainTa: Widyaiswara Mandiri Membangun Bangsa, 6(2), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.51589/ags.v6i2.3123.
-
Nawawi, M. B. (2022). Evaluasi Kirkpatrick level I pelatihan communication skills di Balai Diklat Keuangan Malang. Jurnal Pembelajaran Inovatif, 5(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpi.051.11.
-
-
-
-
-
Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717.
-
-
-
Rizqi, F., & Warih, W. C. (2025). Model evaluasi Kirkpatrick dalam program pembinaan kepribadian di Lapas Kelas IIA Serang. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i4.2139.
-
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
-
Sudarmika, P., Nurhaeni, N. L. P., Agustini, T. F., & Santyasa, I. W. (2023). Training evaluation for nurses and midwives using the Kirkpatrick model. International Journal of Health Sciences, 7(2), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v7n2.14504.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Widiastuti, S., Bachri, B. S., & Maureen, I. Y. (2023). The New World Kirkpatrick Model (NWKM) pada pelatihan mandiri implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka (IKM) melalui platform Merdeka Mengajar (PMM). Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education (JIME), 9(2), 2656–5862. https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v9i1.5083.
-
Wong, A., Hang, P., Singh Sikarwar, T., Balqis, A., Nordin, B., Irwany, N., Rosley, B., Mudzaffar, N. B., Sofea, A., Shokri, B. M., Mui, D., & Kee, H. (2024). The impact of soft skills training on the behavior of multinational technology company employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education (APJME), 7(2), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.32535/apjme.v7i2.327.
-
Zalukhu, T. J., Waruwu, M. H., Mendrofa, Y., & Telaumbanua, E. (2024). Implementasi strategi pelatihan dalam meningkatkan keterampilan non-teknis karyawan untuk memenuhi tuntutan bisnis dan mendorong inovasi pada PT PLN (Persero) UP3 Nias. JESYA, 7(2), 1694–1702. https://doi.org/10.36778/jesya.v7i2.1602.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.