Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Auditor: Survey Terhadap Auditor Di Provinsi Bali
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v11i4.4480Keywords:
Auditor Expertise, Audit Experience, Independence, Professional Skepticism, and Accuracy of Audit OpinionAbstract
Audit opinion is a form of professional statement delivered by the auditor that expresses an assessment of the fairness of the presentation of the entity's financial statements based on generally accepted accounting standards. The accuracy of the auditor in providing an audit opinion plays an important role in building and maintaining public trust in the accounting profession. The opinion given in the audit report will be used by internal and external parties who are affected or interested in the contents of the financial statements of the related entity as a basis for decision making. This study is intended to test the auditor's expertise, audit experience, independence, and professional skepticism on the accuracy of providing audit opinions at KAP operating in the Bali Province. The population and sample of this study were 84 auditors who actively practice at the Bali Province Public Accounting Firm. This study uses a purposive sampling method with data collected through questionnaires, and data analysis is carried out using multiple linear regression. This study shows that audit experience, independence and professional skepticism have a positive effect on the accuracy of providing audit opinions, while auditor expertise does not show any significant effect on the accuracy of providing audit opinions.
Downloads
References
Abbas, D. S., & Basuki, B. (2020). Ketepatan pemberian opini audit oleh akuntan publik dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi: Studi kasus pada kantor akuntan publik di Banten. Competitive Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(2), 1-13.
Agoes, S. (2012). Auditing: Petunjuk praktis pemeriksaan akuntan oleh akuntan publik. Salemba Empat.
Amalia, P. N., Maidani, M., & Kuntadi, C. (2023). Pengaruh kompetensi auditor, independensi auditor, dan skeptisisme profesional auditor terhadap pemberian opini audit. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(4), 428-434.
Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2008). Auditing dan jasa assurance. Erlangga.
Azhar, M. K. S., Azhar, I. A. S., & Maksum, A. (2024). Auditing keuangan teknik penilaian dan pemantauan. PT Media Penerbit Indonesia.
Azzahra, S. A., Purnamasari, P., & Hernawati, N. (2022, July). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional dan independensi terhadap ketepatan pemberian opini oleh auditor. In Bandung Conference Series: Accountancy, 2(2), 1063-1072.
IAPI. (2021). Standar profesional akuntan publik, SA 200 terkait tujuan keseluruhan auditor independen dan pelaksanaan audit berdasarkan standar audit. Jakarta.
Koerniawan, I. (2021). Auditing konsep dan teori pemeriksaan akuntansi. Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik, Semarang.
Mahmuda, D., & Nurmala, P. (2020). Pengaruh keahlian, pengalaman audit, dan pengetahuan akuntansi dan auditing terhadap ketepatan pemberian opini audit. Jurnal Pasar Modal dan Bisnis, 2(2), 183-194.
Novianti, K. P. D. (2019). Pengaruh pengalaman auditor, profesionalisme, dan independensi terhadap ketepatan pemberian opini audit dengan audit judgement sebagai variabel moderating. BAJ (Behavioral Accounting Journal), 2(2), 2615-7004.
Novitasari, N. L. G., Dewi, N. L. P. S., & Dwitama, K. K. (2024). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi ketepatan pemberian opini audit pada kantor akuntan publik di Bali. Journal Research of Accounting, 6(1), 12-26.
Pelu, M. F. A., Abduh, M., & Hesty, H. (2018). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional auditor, situasi audit, etika profesi, pengalaman dan keahlian auditor terhadap ketepatan pemberian opini audit oleh akuntan publik. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Peradaban, 4(2).
Saraswati, C. I. P., Sunarsih, N. M., & Munidewi, I. A. B. (2023). Pengetahuan akuntansi dan auditing, etika, independensi, situasi audit dan pengalaman auditor terhadap ketepatan pemberian opini audit pada kantor akuntan publik di Bali. Kumpulan Hasil Riset Mahasiswa Akuntansi (KHARISMA), 5(2), 403-412.
Septianingsih, D., Idawati, W., & Darmastuti, D. (2021). Pengaruh keahlian audit, pengalaman, audit judgment, dan situasi audit terhadap ketepatan pemberian opini audit. Prosiding Biema, 2, 812-833.
Sugiyono. (2010). Statistika untuk penelitian. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sunarsih, N. M., Yuliastuti, I. A. N., & Suartawan, I. M. (2021). Ketepatan pemberian opini auditor oleh akuntan publik provinsi Bali. Jurnal Revenue, 1(02).
Suparmin, S. (2021). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional, independensi, dan pengalaman auditor terhadap ketepatan pemberian opini audit. RJABM (Research Journal of Accounting and Business Management), 5(1), 1-16.
Wartini, N. L. E. (2024). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional, keahlian audit, pengalaman auditor, situasi audit, etika auditor terhadap ketepatan pemberian opini audit pada kantor akuntan publik di Bali (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar).
Wirasari, N. N. I., Sunarsih, N. M., & Dewi, N. P. S. (2019). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional auditor, etika profesi, keahlian audit dan komitmen profesional auditor terhadap ketepatan pemberian opini oleh auditor pada kantor akuntan publik di Bali. Juara: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 9(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ni Made Rian Melliani, Susanto Salim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
