Main Content

Abstract

Educational management effectiveness at the school level remains a critical yet underexplored determinant of learning quality, particularly in decentralized education systems such as Indonesia's, where schools are granted substantial autonomy in planning and resource management. This study aims to examine the implementation of the four educational management functions—planning, organizing, actuating, and controlling (POAC)—at SMA Negeri 1 Sabang, to assess the effectiveness of this implementation, and to identify the contextual factors that support or hinder it. A qualitative case study approach was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and document analysis involving the principal, vice-principals, teachers, and administrative staff, and analyzed using the interactive model of data condensation, display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that planning and organizing are procedurally well-documented but remain largely top-down, with teacher involvement limited to a consultative role, whereas actuating and controlling are more strongly associated with observable improvements in instructional practice, driven primarily by the principal's personalized leadership and a dual-layer supervisory approach combining scheduled and informal classroom observation. Overall, management implementation was found to be moderately to highly effective, with the majority of planned programs successfully realized, although supervisory follow-up documentation remained inconsistent. Key supporting factors included communicative principal leadership and an active subject-teacher forum (MGMP), while inhibiting factors included limited infrastructure, resistance to change among some senior teachers, and weak parental participation in academic decision-making. These findings suggest that the impact of educational management on learning quality is driven less by administrative procedure and more by the relational and motivational dimensions of leadership practice. This study contributes to the school-based management literature by demonstrating that effectiveness is contingent not merely on the presence of formal management structures, but on the consistency and quality of their enactment in daily school life.

Article Details

How to Cite

Citation Format
Al-Bahri, F. P. (2026). Implementation of POAC-Based Educational Management in Improving Learning Quality: A Case Study at SMA Negeri 1 Sabang. International Journal Education and Computer Studies (IJECS), 6(2), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.35870/ijecs.v6i2.7877

References

38 References
  • Arifin, S., Ismail, I., Bahrun, B., Fajri, M., & Kamaluddin, K. (2026). Principal management strategies for improving teacher discipline in junior high schools: A qualitative study in South Aceh. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 13(1), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.19109/ejpp.v13i1.32149
  • Ayumi, M., & Nasution, I. (2025). Leadership of school principals in improving the quality of teacher learning. Urwatul Wutsqo: Jurnal Studi Kependidikan dan Keislaman, 14(2), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.54437/urwatulwutsqo.v14i2.2201
  • Bandur, A. (2018). Stakeholders' responses to school-based management in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(6), 1082–1098.
  • Bandur, A., Hamsal, M., & Furinto, A. (2022). 21st century experiences in the development of school-based management policy and practices in Indonesia. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 21(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-021-09293-x
  • Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Does school leadership matter for teachers' classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1858119
  • Bendikson, L., Robinson, V., & Hattie, J. (2012). Principal instructional leadership and secondary school performance. SET: Research Information for Teachers, (1), 2–8.
  • Berhanu, K. Z. (2023). Practices, challenges, and prospects of implementing school-based management (SBM) system in Ethiopian schools: Implications for policy makers. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 8(2), 465–504.
  • Bloom, N., Lemos, R., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2015). Does management matter in schools? The Economic Journal, 125(584), 647–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12267
  • Botha, N. (2006). Leadership in school-based management: A case study in selected schools. South African Journal of Education, 26(3), 341–353.
  • Botha, R. J. (2010). School effectiveness: Conceptualising divergent assessment approaches. South African Journal of Education, 30(4), 605–620.
  • Bouranta, N., Psomas, E., & Antony, J. (2021). Findings of quality management studies in primary and secondary education: A systematic literature review. The TQM Journal, 33(3), 729–769.
  • Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
  • Di Liberto, A., Schivardi, F., & Sulis, G. (2015). Managerial practices and student performance. Economic Policy, 30(84), 683–728. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiv015
  • DM, Y. S., & Helmawati, H. (2026). Principal management in improving the professional competence of vocational school teachers in Cianjur Regency. Journal of Science and Education (JSE), 6(2.2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.58905/jse.v6i2.2.683
  • Ekwevugbe, A. O. (2025). Impact of supervision and control on educational outcomes in public secondary schools in Niger Delta States. International Journal of Innovative Education Research, 13(4), 139–149.
  • Eryani, E., & Ahyani, N. (2026). Principal management in improving the quality of learning at SMA Negeri 1 Tanjung Raja. JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan), 11(1), 450–457. https://doi.org/10.31851/jmksp.v11i1.21822
  • Fauzi, M. I., & Wasliman, E. D. (2025). Principal management in improving teacher performance and education quality in private vocational schools. At-Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v7i1.846
  • Firdaus, P. A. N. (2026). The role of principal leadership in enhancing educational empowerment in junior high schools. Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 12(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.19109/tadrib.v12i1.33999
  • Jongyung, T. (2024). Components and indicators of educational leadership. Journal of Education and Learning Reviews, 1(4), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.60027/jelr.2024.793
  • Julianda, E., Ismail, I., Khairuddin, K., & Lala, A. (2024). Academic supervision by school principals: Enhancing junior high school teachers' professional competence. Journal of Educational Management and Learning, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v2i1.170
  • Kadariah, K. (2020). Analysis of the principal's role in improving the quality of primary school management. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 9(2), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v9i2.12333
  • Kalman, M. (2020). School improvement and contextual factors: A qualitative case study on educators' perceptions and experiences. Pedagogical Research, 5(4).
  • Lamatenggo, N., & Suking, A. (2026). The leadership and supervision role of the principal in a public junior high school in Indonesia. South African Journal of Education, 46(1), 1–13.
  • Lin, Y., & Hu, D. (2025). Instructional leadership malfunction in rural areas: Examining the influence of principal instructional leadership on instructional quality in Chinese rural schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432251346085
  • Maulana, H., Yusrianti, S., & Khairiani, K. (2025). School principal management in developing independent learning policy based on local wisdom at MTsN 2 Bireuen. Jurnal Hurriah: Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan dan Penelitian, 6(4), 1577–1589. https://doi.org/10.56806/jh.v6i4.255
  • Mohzana, M. (2025). Analysis of factors influencing the effectiveness of school-based management (SBM). International Journal of Educational Narratives, 3(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijen.v3i1.2155
  • Naicker, I., Pillay, S., & Grant, C. (2016). Schools performing against the odds: Enablements and constraints to school leadership practice. South African Journal of Education, 36(4), 1–10.
  • Niswah, A. C., Rifqi, A., Roesminingsih, E., & Khumaidi, A. (2026). Character-based curriculum management in Islamic senior high schools: A POAC approach to strengthening student character. Journal of Educational Management Research, 5(4), 4341–4355. https://doi.org/10.61987/jemr.v5i4.2488
  • Putra, J., Baharuddin, B., Maimun, A., Haris, A., & Barizi, A. (2023). The role of the school principal in improving teacher performance and school quality. Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 8(3), 468–479.
  • Robinson, V. M., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2007). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why (Vol. 41). Australian Council for Educational Leaders.
  • Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.
  • Rohani, I. R., Hendrowati, T. Y., & Aswad, F. H. (2026). The effectiveness of educational management in reducing inequality in learning access at public senior high schools. Journal of Educational Management Research, 5(1), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.61987/jemr.v5i1.1684
  • Subagio, A. (2025). Implementation of change management by the principal at the driving school at State Senior High School 1 Segedong. Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities, 8(3), 3204–3220. https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v8i3.47733
  • Sugiono, A., & Koswara, N. (2026). Implementation of centralized school management in improving graduate quality. Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, 5(1), 647–661. https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v5i1.2782
  • Sun, R., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2014). Are performance management practices associated with better outcomes? Empirical evidence from New York public schools. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012468058
  • Tavares, P. A. (2015). The impact of school management practices on educational performance: Evidence from public schools in São Paulo. Economics of Education Review, 48, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.05.002
  • Uline, C. L., Miller, D. M., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). School effectiveness: The underlying dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(4), 462–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X98034004002
  • WS, Y. I., Hidayati, D., & Martaningsih, S. T. (2024). Addressing challenges in school-based management: Planning for better learning and resource management. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 5(3), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v5i3.443.

Author Biography

Fauzan Putraga Al-Bahri, STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh

Department of Informatics Management, STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh, Banda Aceh City, Aceh Province, Indonesia.

Downloads

OJS UsageStats Plugin
Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Contrimetric

Recommended Articles