The Role of Multimedia Technology in Enhancing Distance Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/ijecs.v4i1.2647Keywords:
Multimedia Technology, Distance Learning, Learning Effectiveness, Banda Aceh City, EducationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of multimedia technology in enhancing the effectiveness of distance learning in Banda Aceh. Multimedia technology, including videos, animations, simulations, and various online learning platforms, is believed to significantly enrich the teaching and learning process in remote educational environments. The research employs a descriptive quantitative method, utilizing surveys to collect data from students and teachers involved in distance learning across Banda Aceh. The study's population comprises students and teachers from schools that have adopted distance learning, with a randomly selected sample to ensure a representative distribution across different educational levels and socio-economic backgrounds. Data were gathered through questionnaires and interviews, and subsequently analyzed using descriptive statistics. The findings reveal that multimedia technology plays a crucial role in enhancing the effectiveness of distance learning. Among the various technologies, interactive videos and animations were identified as the most effective by both students and teachers. Additionally, the study found that the integration of multimedia technology received positive feedback, with respondents noting that it made learning more engaging and easier to comprehend. This research underscores the importance of incorporating multimedia technology in distance learning to improve educational quality in Banda Aceh. The study also provides recommendations for further teacher training and the development of more advanced multimedia-based educational tools. These findings are expected to contribute positively to educational policy development in Banda Aceh and serve as a reference for educators and educational technology developers
Downloads
References
Anderson, T., & Rourke, L. (2006). Designing for learning: The pursuit of well-structured content. Computers & Education, 47(3), 245-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.005
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning (4th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119158677
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316890
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2010.09.003
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.005
Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2010). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310375207
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Educause Review, 27(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1766728
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306290329
Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 215-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.002
Liu, Z., Zhang, Z., & Wang, L. (2014). Impact of Multimedia Technology on Education: A Comparative Study of Online and Offline Education. Computers & Education, 74, 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.009
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2007). Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments: Speculations on the Role of Cognitive Load in Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. U.S. Department of Education. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326143
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments: Speculations on the Role of Cognitive Load in Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2005). Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animations in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning. Learning and Instruction, 15(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.005
Seufert, T., Schütze, M., & Brünken, R. (2013). Memory and Cognition in Multimedia Learning: The Role of Dual Coding. Computers & Education, 63, 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.002
Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4-28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310375207
Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). The Research Methods Knowledge Base. Atomic Dog Publishing. https://socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statdesc.php
Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional Video in e-Learning: Assessing the Impact of Interactive Video on Learning Effectiveness. Information & Management, 43(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal Education and Computer Studies (IJECS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
