Main Content
Open Access Articles

Towards an AI Literacy Framework for Maritime English Education: Integrating Language, Professional, and Digital Competencies

Main Article Content

  • Yuniar Ayu Hafita1*
  • Ryan Puby Sumarta2
  • Agus Sulistiono3
  • Sunarlia Limbong4
  • Fadel Muhammad5

Article Sidebar

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly influencing language education by providing opportunities for personalized practice, immediate feedback, and flexible access to learning resources. However, effective use of GenAI in Maritime English requires competencies beyond general language proficiency and basic technological skills. Maritime English involves specialized terminology, standardized communication, operational contexts, and professional requirements in which inaccurate or inappropriate AI-generated content may have practical consequences. This conceptual study develops an AI literacy framework for Maritime English education through a conceptual literature synthesis. The synthesis draws on literature published between 2020 and 2026, supplemented by earlier foundational works on AI literacy and English for Specific Purposes (ESP), as well as authoritative Maritime references, including IMO Standard Marine Communication Phrases and IMO Model Course 3.17. Sources were selected based on their relevance to AI literacy, generative AI in language education, ESP, learner autonomy, and Maritime English, with particular attention to their conceptual contributions and applicability to Maritime communication. The synthesis identifies digital-AI competence as the core AI literacy capability, supported by two contextual knowledge bases: language competence and professional Maritime competence. Language competence enables learners to evaluate AI-generated language, while professional Maritime competence supports the verification of terminology, operational relevance, and contextual appropriateness. Digital-AI competence enables critical and responsible interaction with AI systems, including prompt formulation, output evaluation, and information verification. The proposed framework provides a conceptual basis for integrating AI literacy into Maritime English education while maintaining linguistic and professional standards. Future empirical research is needed to operationalize and validate the framework among Maritime English learners, lecturers, and Maritime professionals.

Article Details

How to Cite

Citation Format
Hafita, Y. A., Sumarta, R. P., Sulistiono, A., Limbong, S., & Muhammad, F. (2026). Towards an AI Literacy Framework for Maritime English Education: Integrating Language, Professional, and Digital Competencies. LANCAH: Jurnal Inovasi Dan Tren, 4(2), 1433-1450. https://doi.org/10.35870/ljit.v4i2.8975

References

20 References
  • Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing Courses in English for Specific Purposes (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230290518
  • Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? ? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
  • Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centred Approach (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • International Maritime Organization. (1978). International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW).
  • International Maritime Organization. (2001). IMO Standard Marine Communication Phrases. International Maritime Organization. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Safety/Documents/A.918(22).pdf
  • International Maritime Organization. (2015). Maritime English (2015 Editi). International Maritime Organization. https://imo-epublications.org/content/books/9789280116229
  • Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
  • John, P., Brooks, B., & Schriever, U. (2017). Profiling Maritime communication by non-native speakers: A quantitative comparison between the baseline and standard marine communication phraseology. English for Specific Purposes, 47, 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.03.002
  • Jurkovič, V. (2022). Authentic routine ship-shore communication in the Northern Adriatic Sea area – A corpus analysis of discourse features. English for Specific Purposes, 68, 47–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.06.002
  • Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  • Kohnke, Lucas, Moorhouse, Benjamin Luke, & Zou, Di. (2023). ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
  • Law, L. (2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174
  • Li, B., Lowell, V. L., Wang, C., & Li, X. (2024). A systematic review of the first year of publications on ChatGPT and language education: Examining research on ChatGPT’s use in language learning and teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100266
  • Li, B., Tan, Y. L., Wang, C., & Lowell, V. (2025). Two years of innovation: A systematic review of empirical generative AI research in language learning and teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100445
  • Lo, C. K., Yu, P. L. H., Xu, S., Ng, D. T. K., & Jong, M. S. (2024). Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL/EFL education and related research issues: a systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00342-5
  • Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
  • Mönnigmann, B., & Čulić-Viskota, A. (2017). Standardised English language proficiency testing for seafarers. Transactions on Maritime Science, 6(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v06.n02.007
  • Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
  • Ratnaningsih, D. (2025). Enhancing students’ speaking skills using ChatGPT application in ESP Maritime English learning. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 10(2 SE-Articles), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v10i2.1964
  • Ratnaningsih, D., Munir, A., & Anam, S. (2025). The roles of artificial intelligence (AI) towards students’ communication strategy in ESP Maritime English. Asian Journal of Applied Education, 4(3), 253–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55927/ajae.v4i3.14743

Author Biographies

Yuniar Ayu Hafita

Program Studi Permesinan Kapal, Politeknik Pelayaran Sorong, Indonesia

 

Ryan Puby Sumarta

Program Studi Manajemen Transportasi Laut, Politeknik Pelayaran Sorong, Indonesia

 

Agus Sulistiono, Merchant Marine Polytechnic of Sulawesi Utara

Program Studi Studi Nautika, Politeknik Pelayaran Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia

 

Sunarlia Limbong

Program Studi Ketatalaksanaan Angkutan Laut dan Kepelabuhan, Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Makassar, Indonesia

 

Fadel Muhammad

Program Studi Studi Nautika, Politeknik Pelayaran Sorong, Indonesia

 

Downloads

OJS UsageStats Plugin
Download data is not yet available.
Contrimetric

Recommended Articles

Journal Transparency

Additional Information

Learn more about how this journal ensures quality, ethics, and transparency.