Analisis Peran Social Capital dan Intellectual Capital terhadap Firm Performance pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/ljit.v4i2.8539Keywords:
Firm Performance; Intellectual Capital; Sosial CapitalAbstract
Businesses that prioritize long-term sustainability see their most important productive assets for gaining a competitive edge as distinctive, one-of-a-kind intangible assets, particularly intellectual and social capital. This research aims to investigate the impact of these intangible assets on enhancing business performance. The research cohort comprises manufacturing firms that were listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2016 to 2020. Measurement and structural models were tested in order to assess the research hypotheses. The results demonstrate that intellectual capital exerts a direct beneficial influence on company performance; conversely, social capital—the other intangible asset analyzed—was not shown to directly affect performance. It is anticipated that the outcomes will improve corporate governance and boost stakeholder trust in business performance.
Downloads
References
Aida, R. N., & Rahmawati, E. (2015). Pengaruh Modal Intelektual dan Pengungkapannya Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan: Efek Intervening Kinerja Perusahaan. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.2015.0035.96
Bayraktaroglu, A. E., Calisir, F., & Baskak, M. (2019). Intellectual capital and firm performance: an extended VAIC model. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(3), 406–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-12-2017-0184
Boohene, R., Gyimah, R. A., & Osei, M. B. (2020). Social capital and SME performance: the moderating role of emotional intelligence. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 12(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-10-2018-0103
Bontis, N., & Fitz‐enz, J. (2002). Intellectual capital ROI: a causal map of human capital antecedents and consequents. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(3), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930210435589
Carnini Pulino, S., Ciaburri, M., Magnanelli, B. S., & Nasta, L. (2022). Does ESG Disclosure Influence Firm Performance? Sustainability, 14(13), 7595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137595
Chang, H. H., & Chuang, S.-S. (2011). Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator. Information & Management, 48(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.11.001
Chang, S.-C., & Chu, C.-Y. (2006). The Study of Social Capital, Organizational Learning, Innovativeness, Intellectual Capital, and Performance. In The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning.
Chinedu Innocent, E., Sergius Nwannebuike, U., & Friday Effiong, A. (2022). EMPIRICAL REVIEW OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF LISTED OIL AND GAS SECTOR IN NIGERIA. In Advance Journal of Management, Accounting and Finance Adv. J. Man. Acc. Fin. https://aspjournals.org/ajmaf/
Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., & Wang, E. T. G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
Chowdhury, L. A. M., Rana, T., & Azim, M. I. (2019). Intellectual capital efficiency and organisational performance: In the context of the pharmaceutical industry in Bangladesh. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(6), 784–806. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-10-2018-0171
Fatoki, (2011) The Impact of Human, Social and Financial Capital on the Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in South Africa. Journal Social Science, 29 (3)
Ferdaous, J., & Rahman, M. M. (2019). The effects of intangible assets on firm performance. American Journal of Business, 34(3/4), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajb-11-2018-0065
Gelderman, C. J., Semeijn, J., & Mertschuweit, P. P. (2016). The impact of social capital and technological uncertainty on strategic performance: The supplier perspective. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2016.05.004
Han, Y., & Li, D. (2015). Effects of intellectual capital on innovative performance. Management Decision, 53(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2013-0411
Hsu, L.-C., & Wang, C.-H. (2012). Clarifying the Effect of Intellectual Capital on Performance: The Mediating Role of Dynamic Capability. British Journal of Management, 23(2), 179–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00718.x
Jain, P., Vyas, V., & Roy, A. (2017). Exploring the mediating role of intellectual capital and competitive advantage on the relation between CSR and financial performance in SMEs. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2015-0048
Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643-650. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700602
Goyal, L. (2022). Stakeholder theory: Revisiting the origins. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(3), e2559. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2559
Javakhadze, D., Ferris, S. P., & French, D. W. (2016). Social capital, investments, and external financing. Journal of Corporate Finance, 37, 38–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.12.001 (Javakhadze et al., 2016)
Jirwe, M., Gerrish, K., Keeney, S., & Emami, A. (2009). Identifying the core components of cultural competence: findings from a Delphi study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(18), 2622–2634. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02734.x
Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H., Heikkinen, A., & Laude, D. (2022). Stakeholder Engagement: Past, Present, and Future. Business and Society, 61(5), 1136–1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211066595
Kweh, Q. L., Ting, I. W. K., Hanh, L. T. M., & Zhang, C. (2019). Intellectual capital, governmental presence, and firm performance of publicly listed companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 16(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLIC.2019.098932
Latip, M., Sharkawi, I., Mohamed, Z., & Kasron, N. (2022). The Impact of External Stakeholders’ Pressures on the Intention to Adopt Environmental Management Practices and the Moderating Effects of Firm Size. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.35342
Liao, J., & Welsch, H. (2005). Roles of Social Capital in Venture Creation: Key Dimensions and Research Implications*. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(4), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2005.00141.x
Lins, K. v., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785–1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505
Luoma-aho, V. (2013). Corporate Reputation and the Theory of Social Capital. In The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Reputation (pp. 279–290). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118335529.ch24
Nafiroh, S., & Nahumury, J. (2016). The influence of intellectual capital on company value with financial performance as an intervening variable in financing institutions in Indonesia. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 6(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v6i2.604
Nahapiet, J. (2009). Capitalizing on connections: social capital and strategic management. In V. O. Bartkus & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Social Capital : Reaching Out, Reaching In (pp. 205–238). Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
Ozgun, A. H., Tarim, M., Delen, D., & Zaim, S. (2022). Social capital and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation activities and intellectual capital. Healthcare Analytics, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.health.2022.100046
Ousama, A. A., Hammami, H., & Abdulkarim, M. (2020). The association between intellectual capital and financial performance in the Islamic banking industry. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 13(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2016-0073
Rahman, H. U., Zahid, M., & Khan, M. (2022). Corporate sustainability practices: a new perspective of linking board with firm performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(7–8), 929–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2021.1908826
Mardiandari, P., & Rustiyaningsih, S. (2013). TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL DAN KINERJA KEUANGAN PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR GO PUBLIK DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA. In JRMA Jurnal Riset Manajemen dan Akuntansi (Vol. 1, Issue 1)
McVea, J. F., & Freeman, R. E. (2023). A Names-and-Faces Approach to Stakeholder Management: How Focusing on Stakeholders as Individuals Can Bring Ethics and Entrepreneurial Strategy Together. In S. D. Dmytriyev & R. E. Freeman (Eds.), R. Edward Freeman’s Selected Works on Stakeholder Theory and Business Ethics (pp. 197–215). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04564-6_9
Nurdiakusuma, J., & Chomsatu, Y. (2022). Faktor penentu struktur modal pada perusahaan manufaktur sektor industri barang konsumsi. 19(1), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.29264/jakt.v19i1.10588
Seetharaman, A., Helmi Bin Zaini Sooria, H., & Saravanan, A. S. (2002). Intellectual capital accounting and reporting in the knowledge economy. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(2), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930210424734
Singh, K., & Misra, M. (2021). Linking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Organizational Performance: the moderating effect of corporate reputation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(1), 100139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.100139
Tran, N. P., Dinh, C. T. H., Hoang, H. T. T., & Vo, D. H. (2022). Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance in Vietnam: The Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912763
Ullah, A., Pinglu, C., Ullah, S., Qian, N., & Zaman, M. (2023). Impact of intellectual capital efficiency on financial stability in banks: Insights from an emerging economy. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(2), 1858–1871. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2512
Ulum, S. N., Kartika, D., & Suryatimur, P. (2022). Peran Sistem Pengendalian Internal dan Good Corporate Governance dalam Upaya Pencegahan Fraud. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 10(2), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v10i1.1328
Villena, V. H., Revilla, E., & Choi, T. Y. (2011). The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 561–576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.09.001
Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). Review: The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148626
Yuliana, I. (2019). Profitability relation, corporate social responsibility fund, and environmental performance with firm value (Study at companies listed in the sustainable and responsible investment index (SRI)–Kehati). Management and Economics Journal (MEC-J), 3(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.18860/mec-j.v3i2.7495
Zhong, X., Chen, W., & Ren, G. (2022). The impact of corporate social irresponsibility on emerging-economy firms’ long-term performance: An explanation based on signal theory. Journal of Business Research, 144, 345–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Saparila Worokinasih, Luthfia Dyah Mahadewi, Reyka Happy Sugiastuti, Nur Imamah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
