Komodifikasi Trauma dan Representasi Kekerasan Domestik dalam Novel Luka Paling Dalam Karya Ari Keling: Kajian Sosiologi Sastra Pierre Bourdieu

Authors

  • Siti Zubaidah Universitas Islam Labuhan Batu
  • Zulpahri Nainggolan Universitas Islam Labuhan Batu
  • Ayu Andini Universitas Islam Labuhan Batu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35870/ljit.v4i2.8474

Keywords:

Commodification of Trauma; Domestic Violence; Sociology of Literature; Pierre Bourdieu; Literary Field; Affective Capitalism.

Abstract

This study critical analyzes the aestheticization of human suffering and trauma commodification in Ari Keling's novel Luka Paling Dalam (2019) through Pierre Bourdieu's sociology of literature framework. The research aims to unravel textual representations of domestic violence and explain how psychological trauma is strategic accumulated as cultural and symbolic capital in the contemporary literary field. Utilizing a descriptive-analytical qualitative method combining dialectical textual analysis and Bourdieu’s field analysis, this research draws data from textual korpus units (dialogues, inner monologues, and descriptive narratives) and secondary paratextual documents. The findings reveal three fundamental insights: (1) Domestic violence is represented through stylized and poeticized textual descriptions that intentionally soften physical horror while elevating emotional catharsis for readers, rendering trauma aesthetically consumable; (2) The protagonist’s psychological trauma is structured as an objectified cultural capital that is successfully converted into symbolic distinction and economic revenue via large-scale market production; and (3) The novel's market reception reflects the author's dynamic habitus in navigating heteronomous commercial demands within the Indonesian popular publishing industry. By integrating perspectives from political economy of media and critical literary sociology, the study concludes that while popular narrative depictions of domestic abuse increase public awareness, they simultaneously risk reducing profound social critiques into affect-driven commercial commodities. The study implies the necessity of critical reading practices when consuming popular trauma fictions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments (G. S. Noerr, Ed.; E. Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

Barker, C. (2000). Cultural studies: Theory and practice. SAGE Publications.

Bennett, T. (2005). Culture, power, agent: Essays in critical sociology. Routledge.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature (R. Johnson, Ed.). Polity Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art: genesis and structure of the literary field (S. Emanuel, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

Chambers, C. (2012). Representing trauma in contemporary literature. Palgrave Macmillan.

Damono, S. D. (1979). Sosiologi sastra: Sebuah pengantar. Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Eagleton, T. (2008). Literary theory: An introduction (Anniversary ed.). University of Minnesota Press.

Faruk. (2012). Pengantar sosiologi sastra: Dari strukturalisme genetik sampai post-modernisme (Edisi Revisi). Pustaka Pelajar.

Garrett, R. (2023). Trauma, domestic abuse and affective capitalism in popular women's fiction. Feminist Media Studies, 23(8), 4112–4128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2022.2155861

Genette, G. (1997). Paratexts: Thresholds of interpretation (J. E. Lewin, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.

Hesmondhalgh, D. (2013). The cultural industries (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Polity Press.

Kaplan, E. A. (2005). Trauma culture: The politics of terror and loss in media and literature. Rutgers University Press.

Keling, A. (2019). Luka paling dalam. Laksana.

Mosco, V. (2009). The political economy of communication (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pedwell, C. (2014). Affective relations: The transnational politics of empathy. Palgrave Macmillan.

Pradotokusumo, R. M. (2005). Pengantar sosiologi sastra. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Ratna, N. K. (2015). Teori, metode, dan teknik penelitian sastra. Pustaka Pelajar.

Sapiro, G. (2012). Structural history and the sociology of culture: Adapting Pierre Bourdieu's field theory to the study of literature. Sociologica, 6(2), 1–28.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Webb, J., Schirato, T., & Danaher, G. (2002). Understanding Bourdieu. SAGE Publications.

Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford University Press.

Published

2026-10-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zubaidah, S., Nainggolan, Z., & Andini, A. (2026). Komodifikasi Trauma dan Representasi Kekerasan Domestik dalam Novel Luka Paling Dalam Karya Ari Keling: Kajian Sosiologi Sastra Pierre Bourdieu. LANCAH: Jurnal Inovasi Dan Tren, 4(2), 723-733. https://doi.org/10.35870/ljit.v4i2.8474