Pengaruh Penguasaan Teknologi dan Budaya Kolaborasi terhadap Efektivitas Kerja Pegawai pada Era Flexible Working Arrangement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v12i5.8707Keywords:
Work Effectiveness, Technology Mastery, Collaborative Culture, Flexible Working Arrangement, SEM-PLSAbstract
The implementation of Flexible Working Arrangements (FWA) in public sector organizations requires employees to utilize technology effectively while maintaining collaboration to ensure work effectiveness. This study aims to analyze the effects of technological proficiency and a collaborative work culture on employee work effectiveness in the implementation of FWA. A quantitative approach was employed through a survey of 98 State Civil Apparatus (ASN) employees at KPP Pratama Bengkalis. The study used saturated sampling as a form of non-probability sampling, involving all members of the population as respondents. Data were collected using a Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The results indicate that technological proficiency has a positive and significant effect on work effectiveness (β = 0.296; t = 3.194; p = 0.001), as does collaborative work culture (β = 0.481; t = 4.248; p < 0.001). The R² value of 0.398 indicates that the two variables explain 39.8% of the variance in work effectiveness. Collaborative work culture has a stronger effect than technological proficiency. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening technological competencies and a collaborative work culture to support employee work effectiveness.
Downloads
References
Abdul Hamid, R. (2022). The role of employees’ technology readiness, job meaningfulness and proactive personality in adaptive performance. Sustainability, 14(23), 15696. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315696.
Alriyami, H. M., Alneyadi, K., Alnuaimi, H., & Kampouris, I. (2024). Employees trust, perceived justice, on task performance: Mediating and moderating role of autonomy and organizational culture. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 104, 103647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103647.
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., & Vrontis, D. (2022). Does remote work flexibility enhance organization performance? Moderating role of organization policy and top management support. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1501–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.069.
Chen, Y., Yu, C., Yuan, Y., Lu, F., & Shen, W. (2021). The influence of trust on creativity: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 706234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.706234.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dwiliesanti, W. G., & Yudiarso, A. (2022). Rasch analysis of the Indonesian version of individual work performance questionnaire (IWPQ). JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia), 11(2), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v11i2.24157.
Gagné, M., Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., Dunlop, P. D., Knight, C., Klonek, F. E., & Parent-Rocheleau, X. (2022). Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(7), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00056-w.
Gautam, D. K., Poudel, R. L., & G.C., S. B. (2025). Collaborative culture and higher education institutions’ performance: Does knowledge management process mediate? SAGE Open, 15(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251376435.
Gibbs, M., Mengel, F., & Siemroth, C. (2023). Work from home and productivity: Evidence from personnel and analytics data on information technology professionals. Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, 1(1), 7–41. https://doi.org/10.1086/721803.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Hardani, & others. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Pustaka Ilmu.
Iddrisu, I. (2025). Understanding the nexus between organizational culture and trust: The mediating roles of communication, leadership, and employee relationships. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100555.
Jeyaraj, A. (2022). A meta-regression of task-technology fit in information systems research. International Journal of Information Management, 65, 102493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102493.
Kong, J., Liang, C., Fu, D., Wang, L., Yan, X., Li, S., & Zhang, H. (2023). Reliability and validity evaluation of the Chinese revision of the attitude towards adult vaccination scale. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 883. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15684-x.
Krijgsheld, M., Tummers, L. G., & Scheepers, F. E. (2022). Job performance in healthcare: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07357-5.
Kumar, S., Sohbaty, Z., Jain, R., Shafi, I., & Rupeika-Apoga, R. (2024). Does social media enhance job performance? Examining internal communication and teamwork as mediating mechanisms. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 8(10), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8100124.
Kurniawati, D. T., Ikhram, M. A. D., & Yuana, P. (2021). The mediating role of task-technology fit (TTF) in the effect of knowledge sharing intention on job satisfaction and employee performance. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 10(6), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i6.1336.
Laguerre, R. A., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (2025). Bringing self-determination theory to the forefront: Examining how human resource practices motivate employees of all ages to succeed. Journal of Business and Psychology, 40(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09951-w.
Nawawi, S., Ingsih, K., Riyanto, F., Sari, R. A. A. R. P., & Sartika, M. (2026). Does digital competence improve employee performance? The role of smart digital services mediation in the public sector. Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 11(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.33633/jpeb.v11i1.15497.
Oberländer, M., Beinicke, A., & Bipp, T. (2020). Digital competencies: A review of the literature and applications in the workplace. Computers & Education, 146, 103752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103752.
Ochoa Pacheco, P., & Coello-Montecel, D. (2023). Does psychological empowerment mediate the relationship between digital competencies and job performance? Computers in Human Behavior, 140, 107575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107575.
Pitafi, A. H., & Xie, W. (2024). Exploring how enterprise social media usage affects employee creativity: Based on self-determination theory. Heliyon, 10(5), e27632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27632.
Rahmawati, D., & Pusparini, E. S. (2023). Pengaruh flexible working arrangements dan perceived supervisor support terhadap work engagement dan employee performance: Studi empiris pada organisasi keuangan pemerintah di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen dan Organisasi, 14(4), 322–342. https://doi.org/10.29244/jmo.v14i4.47409.
Slemp, G. R., Lee, M. A., & Mossman, L. H. (2021). Interventions to support autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs in organizations: A systematic review with recommendations for research and practice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(2), 427–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12338.
Widyastuti, T., Ramdani, Z., Alim, S., & Harlianty, R. A. (2024). The Indonesian version of individual work performance questionnaire (IWPQ): Structure factor and criterion validity. Psychological Research and Intervention, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21831/pri.v7i1.76457.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anna Riyanti Dewi, Endi Rekarti, Amir Tengku Ramly
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
