The Role of Personal Cost, Anonymous Reporting Channels, and Moral Intention on Whistleblowing Intention: A Case Study of the Cirebon City Inspectorate

Authors

  • Siti Nurbayti Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • Wiwit Apit Sulistyowati Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v12i5.7078

Keywords:

Personal Cost, Anonymous Reporting Channels, Moral Intention, Whistleblowing Intention

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how personal cost, anonymous reporting channels, and moral intention influence whistleblowing intention among civil servants (PNS), specifically at the Cirebon City Inspectorate. The research sample was selected using purpsive sampling with the criteria of all non-auditor employees, Using a quantitative approach, the data were analyzed using partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to examine the strength and pathways of the relationships among the variables. The results indicate that anonymous reporting channels, and moral intention have a positive and significant effect on whistleblowing intention, but personal cost have no significant effect on whistleblowing intention, suggesting that the availability of reporting mechanisms that ensure the secrecy of the reporter’s identity, and the individual’s moral commitment play a crucial role in encouraging employees to report violations. Overall, these findings confirm that an increase in whistleblowing intention is influenced by a coalition of individual and organizational system factors; therefore, public organizations need to strengthen safe and trustworthy reporting systems and instill ethical values and integrity to support the creation of clean and accountable governance.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Siti Nurbayti, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

    Program Studi Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomu dan Bisnis, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Kota Cirebon, Indonesia.

  • Wiwit Apit Sulistyowati, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

    Program Studi Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomu dan Bisnis, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Kota Cirebon, Indonesia.

References

Abdillah, S. R., Patiro, S. P. S., & Hadiwidjaja, R. D. (2025). Personal cost and fraud seriousness level to whistleblowing intention: The mediating role of organizational commitment. ALIGNMENT: Journal of Administration and Educational Management, 8(4), 1067–1087. https://doi.org/10://doi.org/10.31539/ft00k806.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

Annisyah, T., & Helmayunita, N. (2025). Pengaruh personal cost of reporting, intensitas moral, dan job satisfaction terhadap intensi whistleblowing pada Organisasi Perangkat Daerah (OPD) Kota Bukittinggi. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi (JEA), 7(2), 447–465. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v7i2.2104.

Arismaya, A. D. (2025). Whistleblowing intention: Gen Z as whistleblower. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 7(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.20885/jca.vol7.iss2.art5.

Arvianita, A., Rimenda, T., & Marbun, J. (2021). Analisis faktor-faktor yang dapat meningkatkan minat pegawai untuk melakukan tindakan whistleblowing (Studi Kasus: Bank DKI). ACCOUNT Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, Dan Perbankan, 8(2), 1512–1519. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32722/acc.v8i2.4403.

Hamid, R. S., Anwar, & Anwar, D. S. M. (2019). STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING (SEM) BERbasis VARIAN: Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasi Program SmartPLS 3.2.8 dalam Riset Bisnis (Abiratno, S. Nurdiyanti, & D. A. D. Raksanagara, Eds.; 1st ed.). PT Inkubator Penulis Indonesia (Institut Penulis Indonesia).

Hidayat, E. (2025). Pengaruh komitmen organisasi, pengetahuan whistleblowing, sikap, dan personal cost terhadap minat melakukan whistleblowing pada Bank BNI 46 wilayah 9 Banjarmasin. KEIZAI: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi, Manajemen, & Akuntansi, 6(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.56589/keizai.v6i1.519.

Jaya, M. S. J. I., Handajani, L., & Sakti, D. P. B. (2022). Anteseden intensi menggunakan whistleblowing system. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 12(3), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v12i2.

Khusna, H., & Jannah, R. (2021). Dampak self-efficacy, moral intention, dan budaya etis organisasi terhadap whitleblowing intention. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, 4(2), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.22219/jaa.v4i2.15385.

Lakaba, R., & Pesudo, D. A. A. (2022). Pengaruh jalur pelaporan anonim terhadap niat melakukan whistleblowing dengan moderasi religiusitas. Jurnal PETA, 7(2), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.51289/peta.v7i2.577.

Muslim, R. Y., Minovia, A. F., Novianti, N., & Rasaki, K. (2022). Profesionalisme, sensitivitas etika, personal cost dan intensi melakukan whistleblowing. Jurnal Akuntansi & Ekonomika, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.37859/jae.v12i1.3550.

Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1986). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382668.

Novia, N., Nindito, M., & Zakaria, A. (2023). Pengaruh komitmen profesional, personal cost, dan gender terhadap intensi whistleblowing. Jurnal Akuntansi, Perpajakan, Dan Auditing, 4(2), 486–505. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21009/japa.0402.10.

Nurhalizah, K. H., & Saud, I. M. (2021). Pengaruh tingkat keseriusan pelanggaran, reporting channel, dan retaliasi terhadap niat melakukan whistleblowing. Reviu Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 5(2), 164–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/rabin.v5i2.12376.

Primasari, R. A., & Fidiana. (2020). Whistleblowing berdasarkan intensitas moral, komitmen profesional, dan tingkat keseriusan kecurangan. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 4(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.v4i1.3383.

Priyastiwi, & Setyowati, H. (2025). Fraud reporting: An experimental examination of the effect of security and financial incentives on trust in whistleblowing hotlines. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 28(3), 489–526. https://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.910.

Riantika, R. L. (2021). Anti-fraud dan whistleblowing intention: Peran intensitas moral dan pengambilan keputusan etis. Accounting and Financial Review, 4(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26905/afr.v4i1.5957.

Safitri, D. (2022). The determinants of intent to whistle-blow: Organizational commitment, personal cost of reporting, and legal protection. Accounting Analysis Journal, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v11i1.54734.

Saud, I. M., & Febriana, P. (2022). Pengaruh whistleblowing triangle terhadap intensi dalam melakukan whistleblowing. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 6(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.v6i1.5512.

Solihun, & Yanti, H. B. (2021). Determinan intensi whistleblowing dengan insentif whistleblowing sebagai variabel moderasi. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi, 21(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25105/mraai.v21i1.

Zakaria, M., Rosnidah, I., Nurmala, E., & Azella, N. (2020). Predicting internal and external whistleblowing intentions: Comparative study between Malaysian and Indonesian police forces. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(7).

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Nurbayti, S., & Sulistyowati, W. A. (2026). The Role of Personal Cost, Anonymous Reporting Channels, and Moral Intention on Whistleblowing Intention: A Case Study of the Cirebon City Inspectorate. JEMSI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi), 12(5), 4724-4738. https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v12i5.7078