Pengaruh Transparansi Keberlanjutan, Persepsi Greenwashing dan Literasi ESG Terhadap Kepercayaan Investor Muda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v12i1.6416Keywords:
Sustainability Transparency, Greenwashing Perception, ESG Literacy, Young Investors TrustAbstract
The background of this research is based on the growing attention of the younger generation toward sustainability issues and responsible investment practices, making it important for companies and regulators to understand the factors that shape investor trust. This study aims to analyze the influence of Sustainability Transparency, Perceived Greenwashing, and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Literacy on Young Investors’ Trust. This study employs a quantitative approach using Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The research sample consists of young investors from the Islamic Economics and Business Faculty at UIN Palopo who meet the specified criteria. The model testing includes evaluating both the outer model and inner model through analyses of validity, reliability, path coefficients, and R². The results of the study show that ESG Literacy has a positive and significant effect on Young Investors’ Trust, while Sustainability Transparency and Perceived Greenwashing do not have a significant influence. These findings indicate that young investors’ understanding of ESG principles plays a more decisive role in shaping trust compared to mere sustainability reporting disclosure or perceptions of greenwashing. Practically, this study provides implications for issuers, capital market authorities, and financial education providers to enhance the quality of ESG literacy and to ensure that sustainability information is delivered in a more educational and accessible manner.
Downloads
References
Arifin, S. (2024). Analisis dampak pengungkapan sustainability reporting terhadap kepercayaan investor. 4(1), 213–220.
Awanda, D. W. P., & Bayangkara, I. B. K. (2025). Akuntansi keberlanjutan dan pengungkapan ESG pada PT Unilever Indonesia dan PT Pertamina sebagai perusahaan pemenang ASRRAT. Journal of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE), 6(1), 15–25.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Psychology Press.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419.
Damayanti, V. A., Cahyono, S., & Ardianto, A. (2024). Empirical evidence of ESG disclosure’s impact on corporate investment decision in Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 11(1), 135–154.
Definitions for Responsible Investment Approaches (Issue November). (2023).
Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87.
Deloitte. (2022). The Deloitte Global 2022 Gen Z and Millennial Survey.
Farilla, M. I., Abiprayu, K. B., Manajemen, P. S., & Ekonomika, F. (2025). Kebijakan ESG dan greenwashing: Bagaimana investor memutuskan untuk berinvestasi. 150–172.
Fernandez, D. (2023). ESG knowledge and interest: A study among householders in 8 countries.
Filippini, M., Leippold, M., & Wekhof, T. (2024). Sustainable finance literacy and the determinants of sustainable investing. Journal of Banking and Finance, 163, 107167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107167.
Free, C., & Jones, S. (2024). Greenwashing and sustainability assurance: A review and call for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-11-2023-0201.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Investor, P. B. (2024). J r a k, 14(03), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v14i3.33033.
Keberlanjutan, P. A. (2025). J o l r, 1(2), 431–439.
Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and end of greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 223–249.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.
Norman, W., & Macdonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line.” Wayne Norman and Chris MacDonald, 14(2), 243–262.
Nyilasy, G., Gangadharbatla, H., & Paladino, A. (2014). Perceived greenwashing: The interactive effects of green advertising and corporate environmental performance on consumer reactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 693–707.
Page, A., & Utami, N. (2025). Financial literacy and green investment decisions among Gen Z in Yogyakarta. Journal of Applied Business, Taxation and Economics Research (JABTER), 4(6), 985–995. https://doi.org/10.54408/jabter.v4i6.496.
Pong, H. K. (2024). The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) perception on investor trust and brand relationship quality: A study among retail investors in Hong Kong.
Raghunandan, A., & Rajgopal, S. (2022). Do ESG funds make stakeholder-friendly investments? Review of Accounting Studies, 27(3), 822–863.
Rajesh Babu N, & E Rajamanickam. (2025). Financial transparency and responsible investment: Examining the role of financial literacy and cognitive biases in shaping millennial investment behaviour in Telangana. 32, 1797–1805.
Sitorus, L. M., & Febrianto, S. (2024). Dinamika penerapan standar akuntansi keberlanjutan dalam meningkatkan transparansi dan akuntabilitas keuangan. GEOFORUM. Jurnal Geografi Dan Pendidikan Geografi, 3, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.30598/geoforumvol3iss2pp119-129.
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010.
Subedi, D. P., & Bhandari, D. R. (2024). Impact of psychological factors on investment decisions in Nepalese share market: A mediating role of financial literacy. 02(02), 124–138.
Transparency in Reporting. (2025). Sustainability Directory.
Wahyu, D., Awanda, P., Bagus, I., & Bayangkara, K. (1945). Akuntansi keberlanjutan dan pengungkapan ESG pada PT Unilever Indonesia dan PT Pertamina sebagai perusahaan pemenang ASRRAT.
Walker, K., & Wan, F. (2012). The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: Corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 227–242.
Xu, M., Kei, Y., Geng, R., Liu, Z., & Potter, A. (2025). Greenwashing and market value of firms: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 284, 109606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109606.
Zheng, Z. (2024a). The impact of ESG report transparency on investor behavior. 0, 151–156. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/129/2024.18396.
Zheng, Z. (2024b). The impact of ESG report transparency on investor behavior. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 129(1), 151–156.
Zhong, M., Zhu, Y., Li, R., & Liu, Z. R. (2025). ESG greenwashing and retail investor criticisms. Research in International Business and Finance, 103034.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jumriaty Jusman, Ika Fausiah, Nurfadilah Nurfadilah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.