Advancing Engineering Innovation through Project-Based Learning: A Qualitative Analysis of Experimental Applications in Indian Secondary Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/ijecs.v5i2.4443Keywords:
Project-Based Learning, Engineering Education, Indian Secondary Schools, Experiential Learning, Resource ConstraintsAbstract
Project-Based Learning (PBL) is an active and constructive approach to engineering education in which students are asked to work on problems without predetermined solutions in a problem-solving context. This paper has attempted to investigate the potential impact of PBL on the development of necessary engineering competencies in Indian school students, who constitute a crucial part of the country's potential innovative power base. Using the Hindi versions of 111 science and engineering project documents, this study qualitatively analyzed three of them to examine the projects—Building a Simple Electric Motor, Investigating Sliding Friction on an Inclined Plane, and Designing a Hydrometer Using Plastic Balls. The findings lead to the conclusion that these projects indeed embody fundamental engineering concepts such as electromagnetism, mechanics, and fluid dynamics, while fostering technical competency, creativity, and cooperative problem-solving as reflected in their design structure and projected outcomes. However, substantial barriers to implementing this reform in the Indian context exist, such as resource constraints, an exam-oriented curriculum, and inadequate teacher preparation, as demonstrated by the analysis. The study argues that PBL is a powerful pedagogical tool for transforming engineering education in developing countries, while suggesting relevant measures such as teacher training, curriculum inclusion, policy advocacy for experiential learning, and industry collaboration in these countries to address these challenges. In conclusion, this study highlights the potential of PBL to foster innovation among future engineering graduates in India, a relevant contribution to the national education agenda in the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 as well as global discussions on experiential learning
Downloads
References
Archimedes. (2002). The works of Archimedes. Dover Publications.
Beer, F. P., Johnston, E. R., DeWolf, J. T., & Mazurek, D. F. (2017). Mechanics of materials (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning: An integrated approach. Sense Publishers.
Chen, J., Kolmos, A., & Du, X. (2021). Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: A review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.
Guerra, A. (2017). Integration of sustainability in engineering education: Why is PBL an answer? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(3), 436–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2016-0022.
Guess, R. C. (2022). Design and development of an electrospun polymeric transcatheter heart valve for tissue engineering [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town]. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37190
Gupta, A. (2020). Challenges in implementing inquiry-based learning in Indian schools. Journal of Indian Education, 46(2), 45–60.
Harshitha, M., Kumar, R., Vidyashree, J. C., & others. (2025). Investigating the impact of biaxial geogrid reinforcement on subgrade soil strength enhancement: A machine learning analysis using the MARS model. Indian Geotechnical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-025-01212-8
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Harvard Business Review Press.
Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 275–297). Cambridge University Press.
Mills, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2005). Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 11(2), 2–16.
Ministry of Education, Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Government of India.
Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2018). Physics for scientists and engineers (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Sharma, R. (2018). Pedagogical challenges in Indian science education. Journal of Educational Research, 42(1), 15–30.
Telschow, D., Stein, P., Wolf, H., & Sgambati, A. (2016, June). Low pressure steam turbine exhaust flow: Part 2—Investigation of the condenser neck flow field and 1D modelling. In Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air (Vol. 49866, p. V008T26A026). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2016-57161
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.
Wartman, J., Bray, J. D., & Seed, R. B. (2003). Inclined plane studies of the Newmark sliding block procedure. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129(8), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:8(673)
White, F. M. (2016). Fluid mechanics (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Wood, X., Ghimire, P., Kim, S., Barutha, P., & Jeong, H. D. (2024). Framework for evaluating the success of integrated project delivery in the industrial construction sector: A mixed methods approach and machine learning application. Construction Economics and Building, 24(1–2), 94–118.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vikram Singh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
