The Influence of Blockchain Adoption on Audit Efficiency and Fraud Detection

Authors

  • Hadi Nurhadi STIE Mulia Pratama
  • Mahdi Mahdi Universitas Serambi Mekkah
  • Irdawati Irdawati STIE Mulia Pratama
  • Meliana Meliana Universitas Khairun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35870/ljit.v4i2.8541

Keywords:

Blockchain; Audit Efficiency; Fraud Detection; Continuous Auditing; Smart Contracts; Financial Technology

Abstract

This article examines how the adoption of blockchain technology influences audit efficiency and fraud detection within modern accounting practice. As financial transactions increasingly move into distributed ledger environments, external auditors are compelled to revisit the assumptions, procedures, and tools that underpin traditional assurance work. Through a systematic review of contemporary auditing, accounting information systems, and financial technology literature, this study identifies the mechanisms through which blockchain reshapes the audit process. The findings indicate that blockchain adoption enhances efficiency primarily by enabling real-time access to immutable transaction records, reducing reliance on sampling-based procedures, automating control testing through smart contracts, and facilitating continuous auditing. At the same time, the technology strengthens fraud detection capacity by improving the traceability of transactions, increasing the difficulty of retroactive manipulation, and supporting forensic analysis of anomalous patterns. However, the realization of these benefits is conditional on several factors, including auditor competence, integration with legacy systems, regulatory clarity, data privacy constraints, and the risk that fraud shifts to points where the blockchain boundary intersects with off-chain processes. The review concludes that blockchain does not eliminate the need for professional skepticism; rather, it redefines the focus of auditor judgment from verifying recorded transactions to evaluating the reliability of the underlying technology environment and its governance. Practical implications for audit firms, standard-setting bodies, and regulators are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). An introduction to data analysis for auditors and accountants. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51762

Bonyuet, D. (2020). Blockchain: A new paradigm for auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 17(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-2020-007

Coyne, J. G., & McMickle, P. L. (2017). Can blockchains serve an accounting purpose? Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(2), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51910

Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Toward blockchain-based accounting and assurance. Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51804

Fuller, S. H., & Markelevich, A. (2020). The impact of blockchain on the audit profession. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 17(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-2020-008

Kokina, J., Mancha, R., & Pachamanova, D. (2017). Blockchain: Emergent industry adoption and implications for accounting. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(2), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51911

Liu, M., Wu, K., & Xu, J. J. (2019). How will blockchain technology impact auditing and accounting? Permissionless versus permissioned blockchain. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 16(2), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-52540

Lombardi, R., de Villiers, C., Mio, C., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2022). The disruption of blockchain in auditing: A literature review and research agenda. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(7), 1534-1555. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2020-4992

Rozario, A. M., & Thomas, C. (2019). Reengineering the audit with blockchain and smart contracts. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 16(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-52411

Rozario, A. M., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). Auditing with smart contracts. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 18, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v18_1

Schmitz, J., & Leoni, G. (2019). Accounting and auditing at the time of blockchain technology: A research agenda. Australian Accounting Review, 29(2), 331-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12286

Tschorsch, F., & Scheuermann, B. (2016). Bitcoin and beyond: A technical survey on decentralized digital currencies. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(3), 2084-2123. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2016.2535718

Vasarhelyi, M. A., Alles, M. G., & Kogan, A. (2004). Principles of analytic monitoring for continuous assurance. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 1(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta.2004.1.1.1

Yermack, D. (2017). Corporate governance and blockchains. Review of Finance, 21(1), 7-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfw074

Zhang, Y., Wen, J., & Xiong, F. (2020). Blockchain and audit: A review and research agenda. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(5), 106745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106745

Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14(4), 352-375. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWGS.2018.095647

Published

2026-08-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Nurhadi, H., Mahdi, M., Irdawati, I., & Meliana, M. (2026). The Influence of Blockchain Adoption on Audit Efficiency and Fraud Detection. LANCAH: Jurnal Inovasi Dan Tren, 4(2), 285-293. https://doi.org/10.35870/ljit.v4i2.8541