Public Communication Of The Indonesian Government In Handling Flash Flood Disaster In Sumatra

Authors

  • Selamat Ginting Universitas Nasional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35870/jtik.v10i3.6323

Keywords:

Public Communication, Governance, Flood Management, SCCT

Abstract

This study aims to examine the public communication of the Indonesian Government in handling the flash flood disaster in Sumatra, at the end of 2025. The theory used in this study is the Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT), developed by W. Timothy Coombs, with two assumptions, namely crisis response strategy, and crisis responsibility. The method used is a desk study, by tracing several keywords: government public communication; disaster management; flash flood; through searching Scopus Elsevier, Springer, Taylor & Francis journals, print and electronic media coverage during the Sumatra flash flood disaster, from November 24, 2025 to January 15, 2026, impacts, losses, recovery, and especially the stages in the Indonesian Government's handling of the Sumatra flash flood disaster. The results of the study indicate that the current Prabowo Government does not yet have a measurable, integrated and planned disaster management procedure. This has resulted in inadequate Public Communication, especially in disaster management such as that which occurred in Sumatra. SCCT analysis shows that the Prabowo administration is employing a recovery strategy through apologies, although the exact compensation and corrective actions are unclear. In terms of public communication, the Prabowo administration is still considered slow, uncoordinated, and lacks specific guidelines, particularly for disaster management, particularly the flash floods in Sumatra.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Selamat Ginting, Universitas Nasional

    Lecturer at the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia.

References

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.

Coombs, W. T. (1995). Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the “appropriate” crisis-response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 8(4), 447-476.

Coombs, W. T. (1998). An analytic framework for crisis situations: Better responses from a better understanding of the situation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10(3), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1003_02.

Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2002). Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 165-186.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. J. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Detik.com. (2026). Prabowo ungkap kembali alasan bencana Sumatera tak berstatus nasional.

GenAmikom.com. (2025). Apa itu bencana nasional? Penjelasan dan alasan banjir Sumut tak memenuhi kriteria.

Gonzales, A. (2010). Organizational study of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Herman, A. (2021). Indonesian government’s public communication management during a pandemic. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(1), 244-256.

Horsley, J. S., Liu, B. F., & Levenshus, A. B. (2010). Comparisons of U.S. government communication practices: Expanding the government communication decision wheel. Communication Theory, 20(3), 269-295.

Jamalullail, S., Safira, F., & Hamdi. (2023). The government communication strategy through social media to increase public awareness. Nyimak Journal of Communication, 7(2), 131-146.

Kondolele, S., Sultan, M. I., Akbar, M., & Putra, B. A. (2025). The nexus between public communication and policy implementation revisited: Insights from the population and civil registration service of South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1556747. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1556747.

Owino, R. A. (2022). Government communication and political public relations: The political dimensions of the central national government communication in Kenya. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 27(2), 52-64.

Peraturan Kepala Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana Nomor: 22 Tahun 2010. Tentang pedoman peran serta lembaga internasional dan lembaga asing nonpemerintah pada saat tanggap darurat.

Republika.com. (2025). Pemerintah dinilai tak tanggap atasi bencana Sumatera.

Samatan, N. (2018). Riset komunikasi II. Gunadarma.

Sanders, K., & Canel, M. J. (Eds.). (2013). Government communication: Cases and challenges. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Smith, N. R., Mazzucca, S., Hall, M. G., Lich, K. H., Brownson, R. C., & Frerichs, L. (2022). Opportunities to improve policy dissemination by tailoring communication materials to the research priorities of legislators. Implementation Science Communications, 3, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/S43058-022-00274-6.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

Issue

Section

Computer & Communication Science

How to Cite

Ginting, S. (2026). Public Communication Of The Indonesian Government In Handling Flash Flood Disaster In Sumatra. Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi), 10(3), 1173-1178. https://doi.org/10.35870/jtik.v10i3.6323

Similar Articles

1-5 of 12

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.