Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Stunting Prediction in Jakarta

Authors

  • Ferdinand Marudut Tua Pane University Nasional
  • Djarot Hindarto University Nasional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35870/jtik.v9i4.3853

Keywords:

Stunting, Naive Bayes, Stunting Prediction, Data Mining, Machine Learning, Jakarta

Abstract

Stunting is one medical problem that inhibits a baby's growth. Prompt diagnosis is essential to prevent long-term harm. This study compares machine learning techniques, including Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest, SVM, and ensemble methodologies, in order to improve prediction accuracy. Information on 1,723 children in Jakarta, including age, height, gender, family health history, household income, access to health services, and hygienic circumstances, is included in this dataset, which was collected from Riskesdas and hospital and clinic medical records. To improve model performance, SMOTE, feature selection, and normalization techniques were used. The ensemble approach combined Naïve Bayes with Decision Trees via stacking. The assessment findings indicated that Random Forest had the best accuracy (98%), followed by ensemble technique and Decision Tree (97%), while Naïve Bayes and SVM had lesser accuracy (38% and 37%). This model can assist the government in early intervention to prevent stunting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ferdinand Marudut Tua Pane, University Nasional

    Study Program Informatics Engineering, Faculty of Communication and Information Technology, University Nasional, South Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia.

  • Djarot Hindarto, University Nasional

    Study Program Informatics Engineering, Faculty of Communication and Information Technology, University Nasional, South Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia.

References

Afarini, N., & Hindarto, D. (2024). Forecasting airline passenger growth: Comparative study LSTM vs Prophet vs neural prophet. Sinkron: jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika, 8(1), 505-513. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.13237.

Aziz, F. (2021). Klasifikasi Aktivitas Manusia menggunakan metode Ensemble Stacking berbasis Smartphone. Journal of System and Computer Engineering, 2(1), 106-111. https://doi.org/10.47650/jsce.v1i2.171.

Byna, A. (2020). Monograf analisis komparatif machine learning untuk klasifikasi kejadian stunting.

Hindarto, D. (2023). Enhancing Road Safety with Convolutional Neural Network Traffic Sign Classification. Sinkron: jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika, 7(4), 2810-2818. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i4.13124.

Hindarto, D. (2023). Use ResNet50V2 deep learning model to classify five animal species. Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi), 7(4), 758-768.

Hindarto, D., & Hendrata, F. (2024). Development of Machine Learning Model for Breast Cancer Prediction from Ultrasound Images. Sinkron: jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika, 8(2), 1019-1028. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.13593.

Hindarto, D., & Santoso, H. (2021). Plat Nomor Kendaraan dengan Convolution Neural Network. Jurnal Inovasi Informatika, 6(2), 1-12.

Hindarto, D., & Santoso, H. (2022). Performance Comparison of Supervised Learning Using Non-Neural Network and Neural Network. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika: JANAPATI, 11(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v11i1.40768.

Husaini, A., Hoeronis, I., Lumana, H. H., & Puspareni, L. D. (2023). Early detection of stunting in toddlers based on ensemble machine learning in Purbaratu Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi (JustIN), 11(3), 487. https://doi.org/10.26418/justin.v11i3.66465.

Mkungudza, J., Twabi, H. S., & Manda, S. O. (2024). Development of a diagnostic predictive model for determining child stunting in Malawi: a comparative analysis of variable selection approaches. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 24(1), 175.

Pratama, M. A. E., Hendra, S., Ngemba, H. R., Nur, R., Azhar, R., & Laila, R. (2024). Comparison of machine learning algorithms for predicting stunting prevalence in Indonesia. Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi dan Komputer), 13(2), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v13i2.2097.

Saragih, V. R., Arnita, A., Indra, Z., Taufik, I., & Sinaga, M. S. (2024). Comparison of supervised machine learning methods in predicting the prevalence of stunting in north sumatra province. Journal of Soft Computing Exploration, 5(4), 370-379. https://doi.org/10.52465/joscex.v5i4.498.

Syahfitri, N. A. I., Juledi, A. P., & Muti’ah, R. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithm Performance in Predicting Stunting in Toddlers. Sinkron: jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika, 8(3), 1452-1462. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i3.13698

Tarmizi, S. N. (2023). Prevalensi stunting di Indonesia turun ke 21, 6% dari 24, 4%. Sehat Negeriku.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01

Issue

Section

Computer & Communication Science

How to Cite

Pane, F. M. T., & Hindarto, D. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Stunting Prediction in Jakarta. Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi), 9(4), 1365-1375. https://doi.org/10.35870/jtik.v9i4.3853

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)