Enterprise Architecture Design for a Human Resource Information System in a Tire Manufacturing Company
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/ijsecs.v6i3.8501Keywords:
Enterprise Architecture, TOGAF ADM, ArchiMate, Human Resource Information System, Digital TransformationAbstract
Large manufacturing companies run many human resource (HR) procedures to manage a sizeable workforce, from recruitment and onboarding to attendance, leave, career changes, and training. In practice, these procedures are often supported by a mix of manual steps and several separate applications that are added over time without a single architectural plan. The result is duplicated data entry, fragmented records across departments, and limited traceability between HR objectives and the systems that support them. This study designs an enterprise architecture (EA) for the human resource information system (HRIS) of a large tire manufacturing company, kept anonymous for confidentiality, using the TOGAF Architecture Development Method (Preliminary Phase through Phase F) and ArchiMate 3.1 within a design science research approach. Guided by eight contextualised architecture principles, eighteen official internal HR work-procedure documents were analysed and structured into six core business capabilities across the motivation, business, application, and technology layers, followed by an as-is versus to-be gap analysis. The resulting reference architecture resolves four critical architectural gaps: establishing a single governed employee data repository, unifying multi-level approval workflows, digitising manual administrative forms, and replacing manual multi-plant attendance reconciliation with a scheduled interface between biometric devices and the HRIS Core linked to payroll. Evaluated against four design science criteria—consistency, completeness, traceability, and applicability—the architecture provides end-to-end traceability from managerial drivers to database infrastructure and defines an actionable four-stage, twelve-month migration roadmap. The study contributes a validated, reusable EA model for enterprise HRIS in a labour-intensive manufacturing environment, addressing an empirical gap in prior TOGAF-based case literature.
Downloads
References
Adwan, E. J. (2025). Design and evaluation of a technology/ICT diffusion method for banks – An enterprise architecture perspective. Journal of Computer Science, 21(6), 1454–1471. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2025.1454.1471
Darsono, D., Febriani, S., & Rochmansyah, P. (2026). Enterprise architecture design of SPBE using TOGAF ADM for improving operational efficiency. Journal of Electrical, Electronic, Information, and Communication Technology, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.20961/jeeict.8.1.111052
Dumitriu, D., & Popescu, M. A. M. (2020). Enterprise architecture framework design in IT management. Procedia Manufacturing, 46, 932–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.011
Fuentes-Quijada, G., Ruiz-González, F., & Caro, A. (2024). Enterprise architecture and IT governance to support the BizDevOps approach: A systematic mapping study. Information Systems Frontiers, 27(3), 865–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10473-2
Hamdani, I., Indrajit, R. E., & Firizqi, J. D. (2026). Orchestrating the circular smart palm ecosystem: A design science research using TOGAF-based enterprise architecture. Sinkron: Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 10(2), 937–950. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v10i2.15828
Hamidani, J. Y., & Ali, H. (2025). Enterprise architecture for sustainable SME resilience: Exploring change triggers, adaptive capabilities, and financial performance in developing economies. Sustainability, 17(15), Article 6688. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156688
Hengky, N., Dazki, E., & Indrajit, E. (2024). Proposed implementation uses TOGAF ADM and ArchiMate – Enterprise architecture in retail industry. Sinkron: Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 8(4), 2172–2184. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i4.14052
Hevner, A., & Chatterjee, S. (2010). Design science research in information systems. In Design research in information systems (pp. 9–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8_2
Kassa, E. A., & Mentz, J. C. (2021). Towards a human capabilities conscious enterprise architecture. Information, 12(8), Article 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12080327
Lankhorst, M. (2017). Enterprise architecture at work: Modelling, communication and analysis (4th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53933-0
Li, H. (2021). Optimization of the enterprise human resource management information system based on the Internet of Things. Complexity, 2021, Article 5592850. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5592850
Maulana, Y. M., Azmi, Z. R. M., & Phon, D. N. E. (2023). Business-IT alignment through enterprise architecture in a strategic alignment dimension: A review. Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 9(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.26594/register.v9i1.3084
Ondřík, P., & Jankal, R. (2025). Digital transformation: A comparative analysis of SME digital maturity models. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 13(1), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.9770/w7354634293
Prawira, D. Y., Kurniawan, R. D., Indrajit, R. E., & Dazki, E. (2023). Enterprise architecture design using TOGAF ADM: The case of KotaKita. Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi dan Aplikasi, 6(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.32493/jtsi.v6i2.29416
Prihandono, D., Wijaya, A. P., Wiratama, B., Prananta, W., & Widia, S. (2024). Digital transformation to enhance Indonesian SME performance: Exploring the impact of market competition and digital strategy. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.09
Purnama, W., Indrajit, R. E., & Firizqi, J. D. (2026). An enterprise architecture blueprint for HL7-based RIS–PACS integration using TOGAF ADM: A mobile diagnostic access framework. Sinkron: Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 10(2), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v10i2.15825
Ross, J. W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D. C. (2006). Enterprise architecture as strategy: Creating a foundation for business execution. Harvard Business School Press.
Safrianto, R. (2025). Enterprise architecture planning with TOGAF ADM: A case study of a heavy equipment rental service company. Applied Information System and Management (AISM), 8(2), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.15408/aism.v8i2.46335
Srivastava, S., Dev, S., & Bajaj, B. (2021). Human resource information system use, satisfaction, and success. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 17(1), 106–124. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijeis.2021010106
The Open Group. (2018). TOGAF standard, version 9.2. The Open Group.
The Open Group. (2019). ArchiMate 3.1 specification. The Open Group.
Watasendjaja, W., Chudra, G., & Yohannis, A. (2025). Enterprise architecture for the cruise industry: A TOGAF-ADM and ArchiMate-based approach. Sinkron: Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 9(4), 2038–2050. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v9i4.15218
Widjaja, H., Indrajit, R. E., & Dazki, E. (2025). Transforming real estate: Leveraging TOGAF ADM for digital optimization in enterprise architecture. Sinkron: Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 9(1), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.14219
Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.263.0276
Zhang, Y., Liu, C., & Xia, S. (2025). From hype to value: Harnessing generative AI in retailing from a technology-organization-environment perspective. Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, 4(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEBDE-11-2024-0042
Zhao, H., Li, X., Zhu, J., & Lu, Y. (2026). From data to capability: How digital human resource management and digital assets jointly enhance digital transformation performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2026-0027
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Naura Anasya, Januponsa Firizqi, Erick Dazki, Handri Santoso, Richardus Indrajit
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
