Analysis of Early Detection of Automatic Weather Station Sensor Failures: A Comparative Study of Supervised Deep Neural Networks and Unsupervised Autoencoders

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35870/ijsecs.v6i2.7593

Keywords:

Automatic Weather Station, Deep Neural Network, Autoencoder, Anomaly Detection, Predictive Maintenance

Abstract

Automatic Weather Stations (AWS) continuously collect and record meteorological data in real time and support weather information services. The reliability of AWS observations depends on sensor performance, as sensor failures, equipment degradation, and communication disturbances may produce anomalous data and reduce data quality. This study aims to develop an early-detection approach for AWS sensor anomalies using a Deep Neural Network (DNN) and an Autoencoder, compare their performance, and identify the sensors most frequently associated with anomalies. The dataset consists of 385,237 observations collected from the AWS Ancol station in North Jakarta from January to September 2025, covering nine meteorological and oceanographic parameters. The study involved data preprocessing, Min-Max normalization, model training, and evaluation using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, confusion matrix, and ROC-AUC. The DNN achieved 99.6% accuracy, 0.922 precision, 0.996 recall, 0.958 F1-score, and 1.000 AUC. The Autoencoder achieved 95.8% accuracy, 0.578 precision, 0.023 recall, 0.043 F1-score, and 0.584 AUC. The AUC of 1.000 obtained by the DNN should be interpreted within the characteristics of the labeled dataset used in this study and should not be considered evidence of perfect generalization. Sensor analysis identified wind direction as the parameter most frequently associated with anomalies, contributing 46.67% of the detected anomalies in the DNN and 66.02% in the Autoencoder. These findings indicate that the supervised DNN performed better than the Autoencoder for anomaly detection on the labeled AWS dataset used in this study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Hasbullah Zuhri Hasibuan, Universitas Pamulang

    Master of Informatics Engineering Program, Universitas Pamulang, South Tangerang City, Banten Province, Indonesia.

  • Sudarno Wiharjo, Universitas Pamulang

    Master of Informatics Engineering Program, Universitas Pamulang, South Tangerang City, Banten Province, Indonesia.

  • Yan Mitha Djaksana, Universitas Pamulang

    Master of Informatics Engineering Program, Universitas Pamulang, South Tangerang City, Banten Province, Indonesia.

References

Akbar, G., Prajitno, P., Ariffudin, & Ananda, N. (2024). Multivariate imputation chained equation on solar radiation in automatic weather station. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(7), 3633–3639. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.7679

Ariffudin, A., & Musa, P. (2022). Analisa sistem komunikasi data berbasis Internet of Things (IoT) menggunakan metode PIECES pada sistem pengamatan cuaca otomatis di Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika (BMKG). Jurnal Meteorologi dan Geofisika, 23(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.31172/jmg.v23i2.831

Duraj, A., Szczepaniak, P. S., & Sadok, A. (2025). Detection of anomalies in data streams using the LSTM-CNN model. Sensors, 25(5), 1610. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25051610

Goodfellow, I. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.

Heaton, J. (2018). Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville: Deep learning: The MIT Press, 2016, 800 pp, ISBN: 0262035618. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 19(1), 305–307.

Kaya, Ş. M., İşler, B., Abu-Mahfouz, A. M., Rasheed, J., & AlShammari, A. (2023). An intelligent anomaly detection approach for accurate and reliable weather forecasting at IoT edges: A case study. Sensors, 23(5), 2426. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052426

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.

Malhotra, P., Ramakrishnan, A., Anand, G., Vig, L., Agarwal, P., & Shroff, G. (2016). LSTM-based encoder-decoder for multi-sensor anomaly detection. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.00148

Pahlepi, R., Soekirno, S., & Wicaksana, H. S. (2023). Solar radiation intensity imputation in pyranometer of automatic weather station based on long short term memory. Ultima Computing: Jurnal Sistem Komputer, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.31937/sk.v15i2.3348

Rhamadania, K., Makhsun, M., Basir, C., & Ananda, N. (2026). Imputation of missing weather data in automatic weather station using the GRU algorithm. Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing, 10(2), 1165–1171. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v10i2.12301

Sakurada, M., & Yairi, T. (2014). Anomaly detection using autoencoders with nonlinear dimensionality reduction. In Proceedings of the MLSDA 2014 2nd Workshop on Machine Learning for Sensory Data Analysis (pp. 4–11). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2689746.2689747

Sevruk, B., Ondrás, M., & Chvíla, B. (2009). The WMO precipitation measurement intercomparisons. Atmospheric Research, 92(3), 376–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.016

Utku, A., & Kaya, S. K. (2025). LSTM-based deep learning model for air temperature prediction. IDUNAS Natural & Applied Sciences, 26(32), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.38061/idunas.1596669

Wicaksana, H. S., Winarko, S., & Kurniadi, D. (2023). Treatment on missing data of wind speed measurement in automatic weather station using multivariate imputation chained equation. In 2023 8th International Conference on Instrumentation, Control, and Automation (ICA) (pp. 81–85). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICA58538.2023.10273106

World Meteorological Organization. (2021). Guide to instruments and methods of observation (WMO-No. 8).

Yoon, S., Lee, Y., Lee, J.-G., & Lee, B. S. (2022). Adaptive model pooling for online deep anomaly detection from a complex evolving data stream. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 2347–2357). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3534678.3539348

Downloads

Published

2026-08-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hasibuan, H. Z., Wiharjo, S., & Djaksana, Y. M. (2026). Analysis of Early Detection of Automatic Weather Station Sensor Failures: A Comparative Study of Supervised Deep Neural Networks and Unsupervised Autoencoders. International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS), 6(2), 627-635. https://doi.org/10.35870/ijsecs.v6i2.7593

Most read articles by the same author(s)