Abstract
Accurate prediction of the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations is important for safe geotechnical design, particularly under varying slope and soil conditions where conventional analytical methods may be limited by simplifying assumptions. This study developed and evaluated machine learning models for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations using slope inclination, footing width, foundation depth, and soil friction angle as input variables. A dataset of 399 samples obtained from a previously validated finite element method (FEM)-based investigation was used to train and test Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models. Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R²), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and 10-fold cross-validation. Unlike previous studies that primarily considered conventional foundation and soil parameters, this study incorporates slope inclination within a unified machine learning framework and compares statistical, kernel-based, and ensemble learning approaches under the same evaluation conditions. XGBoost achieved the highest predictive performance, with a testing R² of 0.9938 and an RMSE of 31.669, followed by SVR with an R² of 0.9534 and an RMSE of 86.900. MLR showed comparatively lower performance, with an R² of 0.8396 and an RMSE of 161.158. The 10-fold cross-validation results further indicated stable XGBoost performance, with a mean R² of 0.991 and a standard deviation of 0.003. These results indicate that XGBoost provides high predictive performance for the evaluated dataset and may support bearing capacity estimation for shallow foundation design.
Article Details
How to Cite
Citation FormatReferences
21 References- Ahmad, M., Ahmad, F., Wróblewski, P., Al-Mansob, R. A., Olczak, P., Kamiński, P., Safdar, M., & Rai, P. (2021). Prediction of ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils: A Gaussian process regression approach. Applied Sciences, 11(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110317
- Bozorgzadeh, N., & Feng, Y. (2024). Evaluation structures for machine learning models in geotechnical engineering. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 18(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2024.2313485
- El Gendy, M. (2025). A comparative machine and deep learning approach for predicting ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations in cohesionless soil. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22812-7
- Hakan, E., Talas, Ş., Kurnaz, F., & Erden, C. (2025). Estimation of soil liquefaction using artificial intelligence techniques: An extended comparison between machine and deep learning approaches. Environmental Earth Sciences, 84(5), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-025-12116-4
- Hamdaoui, K., Benzaamia, A., Sari Ahmed, B., et al. (2025). Interpretable machine learning for predicting compression index of clays using SHAP and gradient boosting models. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 72, 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-025-00727-4
- Hsiao, C.-H., Kumar, K., & Rathje, E. M. (2024). Explainable AI models for predicting liquefaction-induced lateral spreading. Frontiers in Built Environment, 10, 1387953. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1387953
- Kiany, K., Baghbani, A., Abuel-Naga, H., Baghbani, H., Arabani, M., & Shalchian, M. M. (2023). Enhancing ultimate bearing capacity prediction of cohesionless soils beneath shallow foundations with grey box and hybrid AI models. Algorithms, 16(10), 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/a16100456
- Kumar, D. R., Samui, P., Burman, A., Wipulanusat, W., & Keawsawasvong, S. (2023). Liquefaction susceptibility using machine learning based on SPT data. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 20, 200281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2023.200281
- Li, H., Hosseini, S., Gordan, B., et al. (2025). Dimensionless machine learning: Dimensional analysis to improve LSSVM and ANN models and predict bearing capacity of circular foundations. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58, 117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-11099-1
- Liao, Z., Dai, S., & Kuosmanen, T. (2024). Convex support vector regression. European Journal of Operational Research, 313(3), 858–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.05.009
- Liu, Y., & Liang, Y. (2024). Integrated machine learning for modeling bearing capacity of shallow foundations. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58534-5
- Mase, L. Z., Misliniyati, R., Muharama, N. A., Supriani, F., Ahmad, D. A., Fernanda, R., Chauhan, V. B., & Chaiyaput, S. (2025). Integrating multiple linear regression analysis and machine learning models to predict the bearing capacity of strip footings on sandy clay slopes. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-025-00544-5
- Nguyen-Son, L., Thai-Phuong, T., & Vo-Minh, T. (2026). Advanced machine learning models for predicting the seismic bearing capacity factors of shallow strip footings considering soil and superstructure inertia effects. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-026-00854-2
- Niu, T., Huang, M., & Yu, J. (2025). Parametric deep learning model for predicting bearing capacity of strip foundation via neural operator. AI in Civil Engineering, 4, 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43503-025-00056-8
- Pantelidis, L. (2024). Bearing capacity of shallow foundations: A focus on the depth factors in combination with the respective N-factors. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-11976-7
- Pei, T., & Luo, N. (2025). Prediction of ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations using physically constrained neural networks. In Geotechnical Frontiers 2025 (Geotechnical Special Publication No. 365, pp. 11–20). American Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784485989.002
- Seo, S., Kim, G., Park, J. B., Kim, J., Park, Y. B., & Chung, M. (2025). Leveraging data-driven machine learning techniques to enhance bearing capacity estimation in prebored and precast piles. Expert Systems with Applications, 285, 128070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128070
- Shah, J., Alam, M., Javed, F., Umar, M., & Ahmad, F. (2025). Comparative performance evaluation of machine learning models for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on granular soils. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13926-z
- Sheil, B., Anagnostopoulos, C., Buckley, R., Ciantia, M. O., Febrianto, E., Fu, J., Gao, Z., Geng, X., Gong, B., Hanley, K., He, P., Kolomvatsos, K., Lopes, B. de C. F. L., Ninić, J., Previtali, M., Rezania, M., Ruiz-Lopez, A., Sun, J., Suryasentana, S., ... Zhang, P. (2026). Artificial intelligence transformations in geotechnics: Progress, challenges and future enablers. Computers and Geotechnics, 189, 107604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107604
- Yaghoubi, E., Yaghoubi, E., Khamees, A., & Vakili, A. H. (2024). A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial neural network, machine learning, deep learning, and ensemble learning approaches in the field of geotechnical engineering. Neural Computing and Applications, 36(21). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-09893-7
- Zeini, H. A., Seno, M. E., Shehab, E. Q., Abood, E. A., Imran, H., Bernardo, L. F. A., & Ribeiro, T. P. (2025). Predicting the bearing capacity of shallow foundations on granular soil using ensemble machine learning models. Geotechnics, 5(3), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics5030057
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Afifah Yurisa Putri, Lindung Zalbuin Mase, Muharram Nur Fikri, Rena Misliniyati, Aidil Fitriansyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction, and adaptation in any medium (even commercially), provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. Authors retain copyright without restrictions and grant the journal the right of first publication as well as non-exclusive publishing rights for archiving, indexing, and scholarly dissemination.
Downloads
OJS UsageStats PluginSimilar Articles
- Optimizing the 2024 Governor Election Quick Count with Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to Increase Voting Prediction Accuracy I Wayan Gede Suacana, Didik Suhariyanto, Ferdinant Nuru · International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS) · Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): APRIL 2024
- Optimization of Employee Burnout Prediction Using Explainable Boosting Machine, Long Short-Term Memory, and Extreme Gradient Boosting Methods in Human Resource Management at PT. XYZ Syahrul Kahfi, Sudarno Wiharjo, Abu Khalid Rivai · International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS) · Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER 2025
- Multiclass Electrical Fault Classification in Three-Phase Power Systems Using Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and XGBoost Sri Mardiyati, Pandhu Pramarta · International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS) · Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): DECEMBER 2026
- Web Attack Detection for SQLi and XSS Using Ensemble Learning Based on Character-Level N-Gram Features Yaya Suharya, Mohammad Bayu Anggara · International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS) · Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): APRIL 2026
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.