Published: 2026-04-30
Comparative Analysis of BGP, OSPF, and RIP Dynamic Routing Protocols in Metro Ethernet Network and Broadband Service Implementation
DOI: 10.35870/ijsecs.v6i1.7141
Ekie Revsie Akbar, Try Mulyoto, Imelda Imelda
Article Metrics
- Scopus Citations
- Google Scholar
- Crossref Citations
- Semantic Scholar
- DataCite Metrics
-
If the link doesn't work, copy the DOI or article title for manual search (API Maintenance).
Abstract
The reliability of Internet Service Provider (ISP) networks increasingly depends on the routing protocols employed to manage traffic across distributed infrastructure. This study investigates and compares the operational performance of three widely adopted dynamic routing protocols — Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), and Routing Information Protocol (RIP) — deployed across the Metro Ethernet network of PT Kreatif Data Prima Nusantara, a regional ISP located in Kedaton, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. The existing network architecture relies on a combined deployment of static routing and OSPF distributed across four Points of Presence (POP): QNN, Tamin, Labuhan Dalam, and INQI. This hybrid configuration has repeatedly produced prolonged convergence delays, operational complexity in fault isolation, and constrained scalability. A simulation-based experimental methodology was adopted, replicating the physical network topology using MikroTik RouterOS-based Cloud Core Routers (CCR). Key performance indicators evaluated include convergence time, CPU utilization, bandwidth overhead, and overall network availability. Experimental outcomes clearly show BGP's superior performance: an average convergence time of 18.36 seconds — substantially faster than RIP's 28.34 seconds and more resource-efficient across all measured dimensions, despite OSPF's faster raw reconvergence at 3.21 seconds; CPU utilization of only 11% compared to 19% for OSPF and 38% for RIP; and bandwidth overhead of 1.9 Kbps versus 9.2 Kbps for OSPF and 26.8 Kbps for RIP. BGP also recorded the highest network availability at 99.98%. The simulation topology encompasses four POPs — a relatively small-scale environment — and results should be read within that scope. These findings support the recommendation that PT Kreatif Data Prima Nusantara adopt a full BGP deployment as its primary routing strategy to improve long-term operational efficiency, network manageability, and service reliability.
Keywords
BGP; OSPF; RIP; Metro Ethernet; Broadband; MikroTik; Dynamic Routing Protocol
Peer Review Process
This article has undergone a double-blind peer review process to ensure quality and impartiality.
Indexing Information
Discover where this journal is indexed at our indexing page.
Open Science Badges
This journal supports transparency in research and encourages authors to meet criteria for Open Science Badges.
How to Cite
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS). The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
-
Section: Articles
-
Published: 2026-04-30
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2026 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/ijsecs.v6i1.7141
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem.
Ekie Revsie Akbar, Universitas Budi Luhur
Department of Magister Ilmu Komputer, Fakultas Teknologi Informasi, Universitas Budi Luhur, South Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
Try Mulyoto, Universitas Budi Luhur
Department of Magister Ilmu Komputer, Fakultas Teknologi Informasi, Universitas Budi Luhur, South Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
-
Aman, K. P., & Musina, A. A. (2025). Comparative analysis of BGP and OSPF performance in multi-level architectures. Bulletin of Shakarim University. Technical Sciences, 1(4(20)), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.53360/2788-7995-2025-4(20)-4
-
-
-
Elmokashfi, A., Kvalbein, A., & Dovrolis, C. (2010). On the scalability of BGP: The roles of topology growth and update rate-limiting. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 28(8), 1250–1261. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2010.101003
-
Fortz, B., & Thorup, M. (2000). Internet traffic engineering by optimizing OSPF weights. Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2000 (pp. 519–528). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.2000.832225
-
-
Huston, G. (2020). BGP in 2020: The year in review. APNIC Blog. https://blog.apnic.net/2021/01/05/bgp-in-2020-the-year-in-review/
-
-
-
Lapukhov, P., Premji, A., & Mitchell, J. (2016). Use of BGP for routing in large-scale data center networks (RFC 7938). Internet Engineering Task Force. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7938
-
Malkin, G. (1998). RIP version 2 (RFC 2453). Internet Engineering Task Force. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2453
-
Metro Ethernet Forum. (2021). MEF 70.1: SD-WAN service attributes and services. https://www.mef.net/resources/mef-70-1-sd-wan-service-attributes-and-services/
-
MikroTik. (2024). RouterOS BGP documentation v7.x. https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/BGP
-
Moy, J. (1998). OSPF version 2 (RFC 2328). Internet Engineering Task Force. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2328
-
Murali Krishna, M., Mudimela, P. R., & Kumar, P. P. (2020). Performance analysis of RIPv2, OSPF and EIGRP protocols using Cisco Packet Tracer Simulator 7.2. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(3), 864–869. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.C5337.029320
-
Mwewa, W., & Lubobya, S. C. (2022). Performance evaluation of routing protocols in enterprise networks. American Journal of Computing and Engineering, 5(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.953
-
-
-
Prasetyo, D., & Wibowo, A. (2021). Evaluasi kinerja OSPF dan BGP pada infrastruktur MikroTik untuk layanan Metro Ethernet. Jurnal Ilmiah FIFO, 13(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.22441/fifo.2021.v13i2.009
-
RamKumar, K., & Anand, S. R. (2016). Optimal performance analysis enabling OSPF and BGP in internal and external WAN. International Journal of Control, Automation, Communication and Systems, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcacs.2016.1101
-
Rekhter, Y., Li, T., & Hares, S. (2006). A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4) (RFC 4271). Internet Engineering Task Force. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4271
-

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.