Published: 2026-04-10
Automated Regression Testing Procedure Based on ISO/IEC 29119 to Improve Software Testing Efficiency in a Software Development Environment
DOI: 10.35870/ijsecs.v6i1.6810
Galuh Oka Safitri, Leni Susanti
Article Metrics
- Scopus Citations
- Google Scholar
- Crossref Citations
- Semantic Scholar
- DataCite Metrics
-
If the link doesn't work, copy the DOI or article title for manual search (API Maintenance).
Abstract
The growing complexity of modern software systems has increased the importance of effective software testing practices to ensure system reliability and quality throughout the development lifecycle. Among various testing activities, regression testing plays a crucial role in verifying that newly introduced changes do not negatively affect previously functioning system components (Yoo & Harman, 2012). However, in many organizations regression testing is still conducted manually, which can be time-consuming and may delay software release cycles. This study aims to design an automated regression testing procedure based on the ISO/IEC 29119 software testing standard in order to improve testing efficiency within a software development environment. A case study was conducted at PT. ABCD to examine the existing regression testing practices. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with members of the Quality Assurance (QA) team, direct observation of testing activities, and analysis of testing documentation. The research process consisted of analyzing the current regression testing workflow, performing gap analysis with the ISO/IEC 29119 framework, and designing an automated regression testing procedure aligned with the standard. The study focused on five system modules comprising 420 regression test cases. The results indicate that manual regression testing required approximately eight working days to complete, with an average execution time of about nine minutes per test case. After implementing the proposed automated testing procedure, the execution time was reduced to approximately one day, or about 1.14 minutes per test case, resulting in an efficiency improvement of approximately 87.5%. These findings suggest that integrating automated regression testing with a structured testing framework such as ISO/IEC 29119 can significantly improve testing efficiency while also supporting better documentation, traceability, and process consistency. From a practical perspective, the proposed approach may help development teams accelerate testing cycles and support faster delivery of software updates in dynamic development environments.
Keywords
Regression Testing; Test Automation; ISO/IEC 29119; Software Testing Process; Software Testing Efficiency
Peer Review Process
This article has undergone a double-blind peer review process to ensure quality and impartiality.
Indexing Information
Discover where this journal is indexed at our indexing page.
Open Science Badges
This journal supports transparency in research and encourages authors to meet criteria for Open Science Badges.
How to Cite
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS). The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
-
Section: Articles
-
Published: 2026-04-10
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2026 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/ijsecs.v6i1.6810
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem.
Galuh Oka Safitri, Universitas Pamulang
Information Systems Study Program, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Pamulang, South Tangerang City, Banten Province, Indonesia
-
Alshammari, M., & Harman, M. (2023). Data-driven approaches for regression testing optimization: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Systems and Software, 198, 111569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111569
-
Ammann, P., & Offutt, J. (2017). Introduction to software testing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107172012
-
Côrtes, C. T., Oliveira, S. M. J. V. D., Santos, R. C. S. D., Francisco, A. A., Riesco, M. L. G., & Shimoda, G. T. (2018). Implementation of evidence-based practices in normal delivery care. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 26, e2988. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2177.2988
-
-
Gami, S., Katru, C., & Shah, K. (2025). Enhancing software reliability through automated CI/CD pipelines. International Journal of Computer Applications, 187(1). https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2025924785
-
-
-
Hasnain, M., Pasha, M. F., Ghani, I., & Jeong, S. R. (2021). Functional requirement-based test case prioritization in regression testing: A systematic literature review. SN Computer Science, 2(6), 421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00821-3
-
-
-
-
Jain, V. (2023). Continuous testing in CI/CD pipelines. International Journal of Innovative Research and Creative Technology, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14883221
-
Kamiya, T., Kusumoto, S., & Inoue, K. (2002). CCFinder: A multilinguistic token-based code clone detection system for large scale source code. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(7), 654–670. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2002.1019480
-
Lima, J. A. P., & Vergilio, S. R. (2020). Test case prioritization in continuous integration environments: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 121, 106268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106268
-
-
Pan, R., Bagherzadeh, M., Ghaleb, T. A., & Briand, L. (2022). Test case selection and prioritization using machine learning: A systematic literature review. Empirical Software Engineering, 27(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-10054-7
-
Panichella, A., Kifetew, F. M., & Tonella, P. (2017). Automated test case generation as a many-objective optimisation problem with dynamic selection of the targets. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 44(2), 122–158. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2017.2663435
-
Parekh, K., & Saxena, S. (2025). Automating regression testing: Optimizing efficiency and coverage in complex software systems. International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, 16(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.36676/jrps.v16.i2.58
-
Shahin, M., Babar, M. A., & Zhu, L. (2017). Continuous integration, delivery and deployment: A systematic review on approaches, tools, challenges and practices. IEEE Access, 5, 3909–3943. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2685629
-
Yoo, S., & Harman, M. (2012). Regression testing minimization, selection and prioritization: A survey. Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 22(2), 67–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/stvr.430
-
Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Gligoric, M., Legunsen, O., & Shi, A. (2022, May). Comparing and combining analysis-based and learning-based regression test selection. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automation of Software Test (pp. 17–28). https://doi.org/10.1145/3524481.3527230

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.