A Comparative Analysis of Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network Methods for Predicting Vocational High School Student Graduation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/ijsecs.v5i3.5742Keywords:
Graduation Prediction, Machine Learning, Support Vector Machine, Artificial Neural Network, Vocational EducationAbstract
Identifying which students may struggle in examinations early on is a critical challenge in vocational schools. This study aims to create and compare two machine learning models to predict the graduation status of Vocational High School (SMK) students majoring in Software and Game Development (PPLG). This prediction is based on their Competency Skills Test (UKK) scores. We used data from 310 students and tested two methods: Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). The results are very clear: the SVM model performed exceptionally well, achieving an accuracy of 99%. SVM was able to recognize both 'Competent' and 'Not Yet Competent' students in a balanced manner. Conversely, the ANN model's performance was poor, with an accuracy of only 66%. This occurred because the ANN failed to learn and simply guessed that all students would pass. This research concludes that SVM is a highly effective method to be used as an early warning system. With this system, schools can more quickly assist students who are at risk of failing. SVM achieved 99% accuracy with perfect precision for the Competent class and full recall for the Not Yet Competent class. ROC-AUC and PR-AUC indicated excellent separability and strong minority-class detection. ANN achieved only 66% accuracy, predicting all samples as Competent. Learning curves revealed stagnation and failure to learn minority class patterns. Additional baseline models (Logistic Regression, Random Forest) were tested, with SVM outperforming all others consistently. Statistical significance testing using McNemar's test confirmed that SVM provides significantly better classification performance than ANN (p < 0.01).
Downloads
References
Pelima, L. R., Sukmana, Y., & Rosmansyah, Y. (2024). Predicting university student graduation using academic performance and machine learning: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 12, 23451-23465. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3361479
Roslan, M. B., & Chen, C. (2022). Educational data mining for student performance prediction: A systematic literature review (2015-2021). International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(5), 147-179.
Albreiki, B., Zaki, N., & Alashwal, H. (2021). A systematic literature review of student' performance prediction using machine learning techniques. Education Sciences, 11(9), 552. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090552
Namoun, A., & Alshanqiti, A. (2020). Predicting student performance using data mining and learning analytics techniques: A systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 11(1), 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010237
Colpo, M. P., Primo, T. T., de Aguiar, M. S., & Cechinel, C. (2024). Educational data mining for dropout prediction: Trends, opportunities, and challenges. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, 32, 220-256. https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2024.3559
López-Zambrano, J., Torralbo, J. A. L., & Romero, C. (2021). Early prediction of student learning performance through data mining: A systematic review. Psicothema, 33(3), 456-472.
Sghir, N., Adadi, A., & Lahmer, M. (2023). Recent advances in predictive learning analytics: A decade systematic review (2012–2022). Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8299-8333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11536-0
Sekeroglu, B., Abiyev, R., Ilhan, A., Arslan, M., & Idoko, J. B. (2021). Systematic literature review on machine learning and student performance prediction: Critical gaps and possible remedies. Applied Sciences, 11(22), 10907. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210907
Prenkaj, B., Velardi, P., Stilo, G., Distante, D., & Faralli, S. (2020). A survey of machine learning approaches for student dropout prediction in online courses. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(3), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3388792
Rastrollo-Guerrero, J. L., Gómez-Pulido, J. A., & Durán-Domínguez, A. (2020). Analyzing and predicting students' performance by means of machine learning: A review. Applied Sciences, 10(3), 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10031042
Punkastyo, D. A., Septian, F., & Syaripudin, A. (2024). Implementasi data mining menggunakan algoritma Naïve Bayes untuk prediksi kelulusan siswa. Journal of System and Computer Engineering, 5(1), 24-35.
Amri, Z., Kusrini, K., & Kusnawi, K. (2023). Prediksi tingkat kelulusan mahasiswa menggunakan algoritma Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, ANN, KNN, dan SVM. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika, 7(2), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.29408/edumatic.v7i2.18620
Darmawan, A., Yudhisari, I., Anwari, A., & Makruf, M. (2023). Pola prediksi kelulusan siswa madrasah aliyah swasta dengan support vector machine dan random forest. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 12(1), 387-400. https://doi.org/10.33395/jmp.v12i2.12388
Latifah, H., & Mujiyono, S. (2023). Perbandingan algoritma Naïve Bayes, K-NN, ID3, dan SVM dalam menentukan prediksi kelulusan siswa di SMK Muhammadiyah Majenang. Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika, 2(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.35473/jamastika.v2i1.1871
Pratama, R., Herdiana, R., Hamonangan, R., & Anwar, S. (2024). Analisis prediksi kelulusan mahasiswa menggunakan metode artificial neural network. JATI (Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika), 8(1), 687-693.
Safitri, D., Hilabi, S. S., & Nurapriani, F. (2023). Analisis penggunaan algoritma klasifikasi dalam prediksi kelulusan menggunakan Orange data mining. Rabit: Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi Univrab, 8(1), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.36341/rabit.v8i1.3009
Wulandari, C., Aviani, T. H. B., & Saputra, R. (2024). Penerapan algoritma support vector machine (SVM) untuk prediksi tingkat kelulusan siswa SMA. RESOLUSI: Rekayasa Teknik Informatika dan Informasi, 4(4), 397-407.
Hussain, M., Zhu, W., Zhang, W., Abidi, S. M. R., & Ali, S. (2019). Using machine learning to predict student difficulties from learning session data. Artificial Intelligence Review, 52(1), 381-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9620-8
Kurani, A., Doshi, P., Vakharia, A., & Shah, M. (2023). A comprehensive comparative study of artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machines (SVM) on stock forecasting. Annals of Data Science, 10(1), 183-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-021-00344-x
Almansour, N. A., Syed, H. F., Khayat, N. R., Altheeb, R. K., Juri, R. E., Alhiyafi, J., ... & Olatunji, S. O. (2019). Neural network and support vector machine for the prediction of chronic kidney disease: A comparative study. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 109, 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.017
Huang, C., Zhou, J., Chen, J., Yang, J., Clawson, K., & Peng, Y. (2023). A feature weighted support vector machine and artificial neural network algorithm for academic course performance prediction. Neural Computing and Applications, 35(16), 11517-11529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-05962-3
Xu, Y. (2016). Maximum margin of twin spheres support vector machine for imbalanced data classification. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 47(6), 1540-1550. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2016.2551735
Nie, F., Hao, Z., & Wang, R. (2024, March). Multi-class support vector machine with maximizing minimum margin. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 38, No. 13, pp. 14466-14473). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i13.29361
Abdulazeez, Y., & Abdulwahab, L. (2018). Application of classification models to predict students' academic performance using classifiers ensemble and synthetic minority over sampling techniques. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 11(2), 142-148. https://doi.org/10.4314/bajopas.v11i2.17
Ghorbani, R., & Ghousi, R. (2020). Comparing different resampling methods in predicting students' performance using machine learning techniques. IEEE Access, 8, 67899-67911. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986809
Tariq, M. A., Sargano, A. B., Iftikhar, M. A., & Habib, Z. (2023). Comparing different oversampling methods in predicting multi-class educational datasets using machine learning techniques. Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 23(4), 199-212.
Bisri, A., Heryatun, Y., & Navira, A. (2025). Educational data mining model using support vector machine for student academic performance evaluation. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 19(1), 478-486.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Didin Sahrudin, Ferhat Aziz, Choirul Basir

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
