Published: 2026-08-04
Dual Pathways of e-WOM toward Perceived Marketing Performance through Brand Reputation and FOMO in Social Commerce
DOI: 10.35870/ijmsit.v6i2.7669
Abstract
The rapid growth of social commerce has transformed electronic word-of-mouth (e-WOM) into a critical factor influencing consumer perceptions and business outcomes. This study aims to examine the influence of e-WOM on Perceived Marketing Performance through the mediating roles of Brand Reputation and Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) within the TikTok Shop ecosystem. Drawing on Signaling Theory and the Resource-Based View (RBV), the study proposes a dual-pathway framework consisting of a cognitive-rational pathway represented by Brand Reputation and an affective-social pathway represented by FoMO. A quantitative research design was employed using a survey method. Data were collected from 245 TikTok Shop users in Indonesia through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that e-WOM significantly influences both Brand Reputation and FOMO. Furthermore, Brand Reputation and FOMO were found to have significant positive effects on Perceived Marketing Performance. Mediation analysis reveals that both variables significantly mediate the relationship between e-WOM and Perceived Marketing Performance. However, Brand Reputation emerged as the dominant mediating mechanism, exhibiting a substantially stronger indirect effect than FOMO. The findings suggest that while emotional triggers contribute to consumer evaluations, reputation-based assessments remain the primary mechanism through which e-WOM translates into perceptions of marketing effectiveness. Theoretically, this study advances social commerce research by integrating cognitive and affective pathways into a unified framework. Practically, the findings suggest that social commerce practitioners should prioritize long-term brand reputation management over short-term promotional hype, utilizing e-WOM to reinforce credibility while selectively employing FOMO-driven tactics during live-stream shopping events.
Keywords
e-WOM; Brand reputation; FOMO; Perceived marketing performance; Social commerce
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology. The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026)
-
Section: Articles
-
Published: 2026-08-04
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2026 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/ijmsit.v6i2.7669
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem.
Fitri Yutika, Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Sabda Setia
Digital Business Study Program, Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Sabda Setia, Pontianak City, West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia
-
Alfina, Hartini, S., & Mardhiyah, D. (2023). FOMO related consumer behaviour in marketing context: A systematic literature review. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2250033
-
Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2021). Resource-Based Theory and the Value Creation Framework. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1936–1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211021655
-
Busalim, A., Hollebeek, L. D., & Lynn, T. (2024). The effect of social commerce attributes on customer engagement: an empirical investigation. Internet Research, 34(7), 187–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2022-0165
-
Chen, X., Ding, R., Wei, S., & Wang, P. (2024). Understanding and mitigating risks in social commerce: an empirical study from the perspective of signalling theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43(10), 2195–2215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2241569
-
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419
-
Dhir, A., Yossatorn, Y., Kaur, P., & Chen, S. (2018). Online social media fatigue and psychological wellbeing—A study of compulsive use, fear of missing out, fatigue, anxiety and depression. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.012
-
Dinh, T. C. T., & Lee, Y. (2024). Fear of Missing Out and Consumption-Sharing Behavior on Social Media: The Moderating Role of Self-Presentation Desire and Social Network Type. SAGE Open, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241295847
-
Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2020.102168
-
Flecha Ortiz, J. A., Santos Corrada, M., Perez, S., Dones, V., & Rodriguez, L. H. (2024). Exploring the influence of uncontrolled social media use, fear of missing out, fear of better options, and fear of doing anything on consumer purchase intent. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/IJCS.12990
-
Good, M. C., & Hyman, M. R. (2021). Direct and indirect effects of fear-of-missing-out appeals on purchase likelihood. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(3), 564–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/CB.1885
-
Hair, J. F., Singh, S., Kaur, R., & Dana, L. P. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publication, 384. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/asi/a-primer-on-partial-least-squares-structural-equation-modeling-pls-sem/book270548
-
Handoyo, S. (2024). Purchasing in the digital age: A meta-analytical perspective on trust, risk, security, and e-WOM in e-commerce. Heliyon, 10(8), e29714. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2024.E29714
-
Hodkinson, C. (2019). ‘Fear of Missing Out’ (FOMO) marketing appeals: A conceptual model. Journal of Marketing Communications, 25(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2016.1234504
-
Ismagilova, E., Slade, E. L., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth Communications on Intention to Buy: A Meta-Analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(5), 1203–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09924-y
-
Katsikeas, C. S., Morgan, N. A., Leonidou, L. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (2016). Assessing performance outcomes in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 80(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1509/JM.15.0287
-
Latupeirissa, J. J. P., & Cistadewi, N. M. W. (2025). Social Media Trends and FoMO Among Gen Z: A Systematic Literature Review. Observatorio (OBS*), 19(3), 159–201. https://doi.org/10.15847/OBSOBS19320252631
-
Li, J., Qi, J., Wu, L., Shi, N., Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2021). The Continued Use of Social Commerce Platforms and Psychological Anxiety—The Roles of Influencers, Informational Incentives and FoMO. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, Vol. 18, Page 12254, 18(22), 12254. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH182212254
-
Maru, C., & Sai Vijay, T. (2024). The relationship between electronic word of mouth and brand: A systematic review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(2), e13017. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJCS.13017;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER
-
Mavlanova, T., Benbunan-Fich, R., & Koufaris, M. (2012). Signaling theory and information asymmetry in online commerce. Information & Management, 49(5), 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2012.05.004
-
Morgan, N. A., Whitler, K. A., Feng, H., & Chari, S. (2018). Research in marketing strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2018 47:1, 47(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11747-018-0598-1
-
Mou, J., & Benyoucef, M. (2021). Consumer behavior in social commerce: Results from a meta-analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120734. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2021.120734
-
Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., Dehaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2013.02.014
-
Rosario, A. B., de Valck, K., & Sotgiu, F. (2019). Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2019 48:3, 48(3), 422–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11747-019-00706-1
-
Rust, R. T. (2020). The future of marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJRESMAR.2019.08.002
-
Shahid, Z. A., Tariq, M. I., Paul, J., Naqvi, S. A., & Hallo, L. (2024). Signaling theory and its relevance in international marketing: a systematic review and future research agenda. International Marketing Review, 41(2), 514–561. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2022-0092
-
Sharma, V. M., & Klein, A. (2025). A signaling theory-based analysis of website features, investment perception and trust propensity in initial trust formation on unfamiliar small online retailers. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 33(2), 232–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2024.2305454
-
Tsai, J. M., & Lu, T. E. (2023). Is brand reputation a banner for social marketing? A social enterprise product consumption perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 40(10), 2041–2059. https://doi.org/10.1002/MAR.21870;
-
Verma, D., & Dewani, P. P. (2021). eWOM credibility: a comprehensive framework and literature review. Online Information Review, 45(3), 481. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2020-0263
-
Walsh, G., & Beatty, S. E. (2007). Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: scale development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11747-007-0015-7
-
Wang, J., & Shahzad, F. (2024). Deciphering Social Commerce: A Quantitative Meta-Analysis Measuring the Social, Technological, and Motivational Dimensions of Consumer Purchase Intentions. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241257591
-
Wongkitrungrueng, A., & Assarut, N. (2020). The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers. Journal of Business Research, 117, 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2018.08.032
-
Yuliana, L., Setiawan, H. A., & Irawan, S. (2023). The Impact of Brand Credibility and Brand Reputation on Brand Performance: An Empirical Analysis. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 10(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.26905/JBM.V10I2.11743
-
Yutika, F. (2026). Determinasi E-WOM Terhadap Reputasi Merek dan Kinerja Bisnis pada Ekosistem Social Commerce. Jurnal Manajerial, 13(01), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.30587/JURNALMANAJERIAL.V13I01.11202
-
Yutika, F., & Ratnawati, R. (2025). Navigating Cryptocurrency Investments among Gen Z in Indonesia: The Role of Social Media Influencer, FOMO, and Financial Literacy. JPEK (Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan), 9(3). https://doi.org/10.29408/JPEK.V9I3.33188
-
Zhang, Z., Jiménez, F. R., & Cicala, J. E. (2020). Fear Of Missing Out Scale: A self-concept perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 37(11), 1619–1634. https://doi.org/10.1002/MAR.21406
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.