Media Hegemony and Political Scandal: The Narrative of Ridwan Kamil Alleged Affair in the Vortex of Power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/jtik.v10i1.5631Keywords:
Media Hegemony, Political Scandal, Media Framing, Online Media, Media DiscourseAbstract
In the realm of politics, scandals involving public figures often attract significant attention, especially when reported by the media. One major scandal that once stirred public discourse was the alleged affair involving Ridwan Kamil. The media plays a crucial role in shaping public perception of political figures, often through news reporting constructed with specific narratives. This study aims to explore how the media constructs narratives surrounding the alleged affair of Ridwan Kamil, and how it utilises its influence to shape public opinion and reinforce power structures through such reporting. Using Antonio Gramsci’s theory of hegemony, this research analyses how major Indonesian media outlets, such as Kompas.com, Detik.com, and CNN Indonesia, presented news coverage of this scandal. It also examines how the media frames the news in ways that influence the public’s perception of Ridwan Kamil and his political standing. The method employed is discourse analysis, focusing on the texts and narratives built by the media. This research not only investigates what is reported but also how the reporting itself constructs public perception and discourse. The findings reveal that scandals related to personal morality have significant destructive potential, as Indonesian society still views political leaders as moral figures. The clear polarisation of public opinion in Ridwan Kamil’s case is not solely caused by the content of the news but also by the selective consumption of information facilitated by social media algorithms. This study also identifies character assassination as a political communication strategy used to damage reputations by attacking personal aspects. Ideological bias in media coverage aligns with Herman and Chomsky’s propaganda model, where the media serves the interests of capital owners and those in power.
Downloads
References
Benoit, W. L. (2013). Political election debates: Informing voters about policy and character. Lexington Books.
Ching Velasco, J., Manguera, J. J. C., Navalan, E. J. V., Limchiko, J. N. C., Bayot, T. A. M. D., & Mercado, M. G. V. (2024). The Digital Dynamics of Political Engagement Among Filipino Youth: Examining Participation in Social Media Platforms. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 32(3).
Chomsky, N. (1989). Political economy of the mass media. David Barsamian/Alternative Radio.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. McQuail's reader in mass communication theory, 390, 397.
Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House's frame after 9/11. Political Communication,, 20(4), 415-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176
Gramsci, A. (1999). The Antonio Gramsci Reader. Lawrence and Wishart.
Gramsci, A. (2020). Selections from the prison notebooks. In The applied theatre reader (pp. 141-142). Routledge.
Hartono, L. (2015). Teknik humor dalam film Warkop DKI (Doctoral dissertation, Petra Christian University).
Heryanto, A. (2020). Identity and pleasure: The politics of Indonesian screen culture. NUS Press.
Irawan, D. (2021). Media, emosi, dan politik post-truth. Media dan Politik, 7(1).
Jhon B. Thompson. (2003). Analisis ideologi dunia. IRCISOD.
Kusuma, D. (2021). Media, kekuasaan, dan skandal politik di era digital. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 10(2).
Latief, H. (2023). Pemetaan afiliasi politik media di Indonesia. Media dan Politik, 7(2).
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. MIT Press.
Napoli, P. M. (2019). Media technological innovation and the future of democracy. Oxford University Press.
Ngo, T. (2025). A content analysis of e-newspaper comments in Vietnam: Exploring the dynamic shifts in public perception of AI’s impact on jobs. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 33(3), 973–993. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.33.3.02.
Putra, A. (2012). Paradigma profetik dalam pengajaran dan penelitian ilmu hukum. UNISIA, 8(76), 89–95.
Rahmawati, L. (2022). Viralitas dan skandal politik. Jurnal Media Digital, 5(1).
Saragih, P. (2023). Media, politik, dan skandal pribadi. Indonesian Political Review, 8(2).
Sari, P. (2022). Personalisasi politik di era digital. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 11(2).
Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2014). 16. Mediatization of politics: Transforming democracies and reshaping politics. Mediatization of communication, 21, 375. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215.375.
Suharto, R. (2022). Media dan partisan politik. Jurnal Demokrasi Indonesia, 4(2).
Tambunan, M. (2020). Politik moralitas dalam media Indonesia. Jurnal Media Politik, 6(2).
Wodak, F. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction: Discourse studies a multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 2, pp. 184–202). Sage Publications.
Yanuar, D., Dinita, N., Putri, A., & Laksmi, S. (2012). Mapping the landscape of the media industry in contemporary Indonesia.
Zaharim, M. Z. A. M., Khir, A. M., Burhan, N. A. S., & Noor, A. M. (2024). The impact of antisocial media towards aggressive behavior among online gamers in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 32(3), 1027–1049. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.32.3.11.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amin Aminudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
