Integrating Digital SCOR and Quality Management in the Textile Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/ijmsit.v6i2.8314Keywords:
SCOR Digital Standard, Digital Supply Chain, Quality Management, Supply Chain Performance, Textile IndustryAbstract
The growing complexity of textile supply chains has increased the need for digital capabilities that enhance operational coordination, process integration, and quality management. The integration of digital supply chain standards with quality management remains important for improving supply chain outcomes in the textile industry. This study examines the relationship between the SCOR Digital Standard (SCOR DS) and Supply Chain Performance (SCP), with Quality Management (QM) serving as a mediating mechanism. A quantitative explanatory approach was employed using data from 320 personnel involved in supply chain, production, quality, and operational activities in the textile industry. Data were collected through structured Likert-scale questionnaires and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SCOR DS has a significant positive effect on QM (β = 0.454, p < 0.001) and SCP (β = 0.142, p = 0.009). QM also has a stronger positive effect on SCP (β = 0.484, p < 0.001). Furthermore, QM significantly mediates the relationship between SCOR DS and SCP (β = 0.220, p = 0.007). Digital supply chain capabilities based on SCOR DS can strengthen supply chain performance, particularly when supported by effective quality management. The findings provide an integrated perspective for aligning digital SCOR practices with quality management to improve textile supply chain performance.
Downloads
References
Abourokbah, S. H., Salam, M. A., & Badawi, N. S. (2026). Supply Chain Information Integration in the Digital Era Leading to Performance Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 18(6), 3098. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18063098
Al Tera, A., Alzubi, A., & Iyiola, K. (2024). Supply chain digitalization and performance: A moderated mediation of supply chain visibility and supply chain survivability. Heliyon, 10(4), e25584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25584
Aninda, N., & Karyani, E. (2022). Supply Chain Digitalization and Operational Performance. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 13(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJABIM.298000
Ayadi, F. M., Alaskar, T. H., Aloulou, W. J., & Alsadi, A. K. (2024). From Digital Platform Capabilities to Firm Performance. International Journal of Customer Relationship Marketing and Management, 15(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCRMM.338997
Briatore, F., Vanni, F., Mosca, M. T., Mosca, R. N., Fruggiero, F., & Mancusi, F. (2025). Exploring Industry 4.0’s Role in Sustainable Supply Chains: Perspectives from a Bibliometric Review. Logistics, 9(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics9010026
Burgess, P. R., Sunmola, F. T., & Wertheim-Heck, S. (2023). A review of supply chain quality management practices in sustainable food networks. Heliyon, 9(11), e21179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21179
Costa, F., Alemsan, N., Bilancia, A., Tortorella, G. L., & Portioli Staudacher, A. (2024). Integrating industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing for a sustainable green transition: A comprehensive model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 465, 142728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142728
Deng, Y., Cai, C., He, Z., & Wang, H. (2025). How does Quality 4.0 affect innovation performance? An empirical study from the Yangtze River Delta region of China. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 42(10), 2767–2792. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-06-2024-0186
Dixit, V. K., Malviya, R. K., Kumar, V., & Shankar, R. (2024). An analysis of the strategies for overcoming digital supply chain implementation barriers. Decision Analytics Journal, 10, 100389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100389
Emon, M. M. H., & Khan, T. (2025). The transformative role of Industry 4.0 in supply chains: Exploring digital integration and innovation in the manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(2), 100516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100516
Guenther, P., Guenther, M., Ringle, C. M., Zaefarian, G., & Cartwright, S. (2023). Improving PLS-SEM use for business marketing research. Industrial Marketing Management, 111, 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.03.010
Hafid, A., Sebtaoui, F. E., & Mouchtachi, A. (2025). An Overview of the Transformation Towards Quality 4.0: Technological Needs, Challenges, and Benefits. ICATH 2025, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025112018
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
Han, H., & Li, J. (2025). Leveraging industry 4.0 technologies for sustainable supply chain management: A systematic review. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 16, 100246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2025.100246
Hermanu, A. I., Sari, D., Sondari, M. C., & Dimyati, M. (2024). A serial mediation model relationship among input, process, and research performance: the role of output, productivity, and outcome. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2415740
Hu, W., Fernández-Olmos, M., & Depetris-Chauvin, N. (2026). Quality over quantity: The role of digital adoption depth in driving firm flexibility and sustainability. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 20, 100399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2026.100399
Huang, K., Wang, K., Lee, P. K. C., & Yeung, A. C. L. (2023). The impact of industry 4.0 on supply chain capability and supply chain resilience: A dynamic resource-based view. International Journal of Production Economics, 262, 108913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108913
Joshi, S., & Sharma, M. (2022). Sustainable Performance through Digital Supply Chains in Industry 4.0 Era: Amidst the Pandemic Experience. Sustainability, 14(24), 16726. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416726
Khan, S., Tayyab, M., Tahir, H., & Khan, I. (2026). Examining the Joint Impact of Digital Dexterity and Collaboration on Supply Chain Performance and Quality Management. Transportation Research Procedia, 96, 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2026.04.028
Lahmar, A., & Siddiqui, A. A. (2026). Synergizing supply chain management and digital technologies: a systematic review and framework for resilience and sustainability. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 28(2), 225–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-03-2025-0124
Le, N. T. T., Van Nguyen, P., Tran, K. T., Vrontis, D., & Nguyen, A. T. C. (2026). Digital innovation, capabilities, and organizational agility as drivers of firm performance under government support. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 17, 101054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2026.101054
Li, P., Chen, Y., & Guo, X. (2025). Digital transformation and supply chain resilience. International Review of Economics and Finance, 99(March), 104033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104033
Mehta, A., Sharma, P., Banerjee, M., & Arora, B. (2026). Evaluating the use of PLS-SEM in financial literacy research: a systematic literature review and methodological assessment. SN Business & Economics, 6(8), 267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-026-01278-3
Ning, L., & Yao, D. (2023). The Impact of Digital Transformation on Supply Chain Capabilities and Supply Chain Competitive Performance. Sustainability, 15(13), 10107. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310107
Ntobongwana, L., & Telukdarie, A. (2024). A critical review of global best practices elements in digital technologies: Advancing a theoretical architecture for quality engineering. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 41, 100665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2024.100665
Oliveira, A. C. A., Pinho, A. F. de, & Brendon, M. F. (2026). Quality 4.0: a systematic literature review and future research agenda for the digital transformation of quality management. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 43(6), 1650–1673. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-05-2025-0165
Osman, S. M. H., Yin, T. S., Alnoor, A., Alazzawi, M. S., & Foo, N. T. (2025). Uncovering the impact of supply chain management practices on supply chain performance: A hybrid PLS-SEM and ANN approach. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(4), 100684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100684
Peng, Y., Xiao, Z., & Li, Y. (2026). The Impact of Digital Transformation on Sustainable Supply Chain Performance: The Mediating Effect of Service Innovation. Data Science and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2026.02.001
Rana, J., Ahmad, M. Z., Islam, M. F., Jihad, M. N. I., Rashed, M., & Kamruzzaman, M. (2025). Optimizing supply chain performance through sustainable manufacturing practices and capabilities in emerging markets: an integrated linear (PLS-SEM) and non-linear (fsQCA) approach. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 16, 100257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2025.100257
Sabău-Popa, C.-D., Perțicaș, D.-C., Florea, A.-G., Hatos, R., & Juma, H. W. (2026). Sustainability-Oriented Digital Transformation Under Industry 4.0: Managerial Perceptions of Digitalization and AI. Sustainability, 18(5), 2570. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052570
Sahar, R., Iqbal, J., Abu Jahid, M., Abdullahel Kafi, M., & Qarar, W. (2026). Adoption of digital technologies in operation to improve sustainability: a bibliometric and content analysis for future studies. Future Business Journal, 12(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-026-00745-5
Sahoo, S., Islam, N., Kumar, A., & Mangla, S. K. (2025). Exploring relationship between digital dexterity, supply chain quality management, agility and performance – Empirical evidence from Indian B2B manufacturers. Industrial Marketing Management, 127, 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.03.008
Schmidt, M.-C., Veile, J. W., Müller, J. M., & Voigt, K.-I. (2023). Industry 4.0 implementation in the supply chain: a review on the evolution of buyer-supplier relationships. International Journal of Production Research, 61(17), 6063–6080. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2120923
Tanveer, M., Yu, Z., & Khan, M. F. (2026). Integrating digital technologies and stakeholder collaboration for circular supply chain transformation: A study of industrial sustainability. Digital Business, 6(2), 100175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2026.100175
Teymourifar, A. (2026). A critical review of the SCOR Digital Standard (SCOR-DS): conceptual implications for supply chain performance measurement. Frontiers in Sustainability, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2026.1769304
Zaman, S. A. A., Vilkas, M., Zaman, S. I., & Jamil, S. (2025). Digital technologies and digitalization performance: the mediating role of digitalization management. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 36(2), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2024-0176
Zhao, N., Hong, J., & Lau, K. H. (2023). Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multi-mediation model. International Journal of Production Economics, 259, 108817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108817
Zhou, X., Zhu, Q., & Xu, Z. (2022). The mediating role of supply chain quality management for traceability and performance improvement: Evidence among Chinese food firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 254, 108630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108630
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Evan Nugraha, Rini Mulyani Sari, Rida Norina

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
