Published: 2026-07-05
Analysis of Technostress and Its Impact on Lecturer Performance in Technology-Based Learning
DOI: 10.35870/ijmsit.v6i2.7543
Sundari Soekotjo, Dwi Novita Sari, Hardianawati, Indria Sukma Sektiyaningsih, Mintarsih, Pingkan Luciawati Sompi, Rochayati Febriarhamadini, Dina Agnesia Sihombing, Prasastiara Eka Marsella
-
Sundari Soekotjo:
Universitas Budi Luhur
- Dwi Novita Sari: Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
- Hardianawati: Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
- Indria Sukma Sektiyaningsih: Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
- Mintarsih: Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
- Pingkan Luciawati Sompi: Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
- Rochayati Febriarhamadini: Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
- Dina Agnesia Sihombing: Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
- Prasastiara Eka Marsella: Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
Article Metrics
- Scopus Citations
- Google Scholar
- Crossref Citations
- Semantic Scholar
- DataCite Metrics
-
If the link doesn't work, copy the DOI or article title for manual search (API Maintenance).
Abstract
This study investigates technostress among lecturers in private universities under LLDIKTI Region III Jakarta and examines its impact on lecturer performance in technology-based learning environments. Employing a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews with 15 lecturers from various academic ranks, supported by observation and document analysis. Data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, involving data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that lecturers experience multiple dimensions of technostress, including techno-overload, techno-invasion, techno-complexity, and psychological strain. Techno-overload emerges as the most dominant form, characterized by increased workload and continuous digital demands. Techno-invasion reflects the erosion of work–life boundaries due to constant digital connectivity, while techno-complexity highlights adaptation challenges to rapidly evolving technologies. These conditions collectively contribute to psychological outcomes such as stress, fatigue, and emotional exhaustion. Although technology enhances instructional flexibility and learning innovation, it simultaneously generates a paradox of increased cognitive and emotional burden. The study further finds that technostress influences lecturer performance in both enabling and constraining ways, depending on individual digital competence and institutional support. Lecturers adopt various adaptive strategies, including peer collaboration, self-directed learning, and participation in training programs, to mitigate technostress. The study concludes that technostress is not merely an individual issue but an organizational phenomenon embedded within digital transformation in higher education. The findings provide implications for developing sustainable digital policies and strengthening institutional support systems to enhance lecturer well-being and performance.
Keywords
Technostress; Lecturer performance; Digital learning; Higher education; Qualitative study; LMS
Peer Review Process
This article has undergone a double-blind peer review process to ensure quality and impartiality.
Indexing Information
Discover where this journal is indexed at our indexing page.
Open Science Badges
This journal supports transparency in research and encourages authors to meet criteria for Open Science Badges.
How to Cite
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology. The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026)
-
Section: Articles
-
Published: 2026-07-05
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2026 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/ijmsit.v6i2.7543
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem.
Sundari Soekotjo, Universitas Budi Luhur
Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Budi Luhur, South Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
Dwi Novita Sari, Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics, Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi, East Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
Hardianawati, Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
Business Administration Study Program, Faculty of Administrative and Secretarial Sciences, Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi, East Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
Indria Sukma Sektiyaningsih, Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
Business Administration Study Program, Faculty of Administrative and Secretarial Sciences, Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi, East Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
Mintarsih, Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics, Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi, East Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
Pingkan Luciawati Sompi, Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
Office Administration Study Program, Faculty of Administrative and Secretarial Sciences, Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi, East Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
Rochayati Febriarhamadini, Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
Business Administration Study Program, Faculty of Administrative and Secretarial Sciences, Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi, East Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
Dina Agnesia Sihombing, Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
Business Administration Study Program, Faculty of Administrative and Secretarial Sciences, Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi, East Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
-
-
Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831–858. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409963
-
Califf, C. B., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2020). The bright and dark sides of technostress: A mixed-methods study involving healthcare IT. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00018
-
-
-
Kline, R., et al. (2022). Digital dependency and academic workload in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 44(3), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2022.2034567
-
La Torre, G., Esposito, A., Sciarra, I., & Chiappetta, M. (2020). Definition, symptoms and risk of techno-stress: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134825
-
-
Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
-
-
Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Cifre, E. (2013). The dark side of technologies: Technostress among users of information and communication technologies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(3), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1898
-
Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J. F. (2019). The technostress trifecta—Techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 6–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12169
-
Upadhyaya, P., & Vrinda. (2021). Impact of technostress on academic productivity of higher education faculty. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1647–1664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10338-4
-
Wang, Q., & Yao, N. (2025). Understanding the impact of technology usage at work on academics’ psychological well-being: A technostress perspective. BMC Psychology, 13, 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-01234-0
-
Zhao, X., Wang, X., & Guo, X. (2024). Towards a bright side of technostress in higher education teachers. Technology in Society, 76, 102428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102428

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.