Utilization of Agentic AI in Financial Decision-Making: Optimizing Risk Profiles, Predicting Loan Approvals, and Automating Treasury Management in Digital Banking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/ijmsit.v6i1.7368Keywords:
Agentic AI, Digital banking, credit risk, Loan approval, Treasury managementAbstract
This research investigates the role of agentic AI in enhancing financial decision-making within digital banking, concentrating on customer risk profiling, loan approval predictions, and the automation of treasury management. Utilizing a literature review approach, the study examines relevant sources on artificial intelligence, machine learning, credit risk, loan analysis, and banking risk management. The results reveal that agentic AI enables banks to identify transaction patterns, evaluate repayment capabilities, and estimate credit risks while offering initial recommendations for loan approvals. Furthermore, in treasury operations, agentic AI facilitates cash flow monitoring, liquidity forecasting, and agile funding management. However, the integration of this technology brings forth challenges, including data bias, information security concerns, accountability in decision-making, and the necessity for human oversight. It is crucial to view agentic AI as a tool that complements rather than replaces human analysts and management. To align its use with prudent banking practices, it is vital to enhance data governance, conduct thorough model audits, safeguard customer information, and clearly define system authority limits.
Downloads
References
Bao, W., Lianju, N., & Yue, K. (2019). Integration of unsupervised and supervised machine learning algorithms for credit risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 128, 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.02.033
Barboza, F., Kimura, H., & Altman, E. (2017). Machine learning models and bankruptcy prediction. Expert systems with applications, 83, 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.006
Bekhet, H. A., & Eletter, S. F. K. (2014). Credit risk assessment model for Jordanian commercial banks: Neural scoring approach. Review of Development Finance, 4(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2451-0
Bhatore, S., Mohan, L., & Reddy, Y. R. (2020). Machine learning techniques for credit risk evaluation: a systematic literature review. Journal of Banking and Financial Technology, 4(1), 111-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42786-020-00020-3
Boughaci, D., & Alkhawaldeh, A. A. S. (2018). Three local search-based methods for feature selection in credit scoring. Vietnam Journal of Computer Science, 5(2), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40595-018-0107-y
Bussmann, N., Giudici, P., Marinelli, D., & Papenbrock, J. (2021). Explainable machine learning in credit risk management. Computational Economics, 57(1), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-020-10042-0
Cao, L. (2022). Ai in finance: challenges, techniques, and opportunities. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 55(3), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3502289
Chang, V., Sivakulasingam, S., Wang, H., Wong, S. T., Ganatra, M. A., & Luo, J. (2024). Credit risk prediction using machine learning and deep learning: A study on credit card customers. Risks, 12(11), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12110174
Fan, S., Shen, Y., & Peng, S. (2020). Improved ML‐based technique for credit card scoring in internet financial risk control. Complexity, 2020(1), 8706285. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8706285
Jemai, J., & Zarrad, A. (2023). Feature selection engineering for credit risk assessment in retail banking. Information, 14(3), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14040200
Kshetri, N. (2025). The Rise of Agentic AI in Finance: Opportunities, Risks, and Human-Centric Integration. IT Professional, 27(4), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2025.11125703
Li, Y., & Chen, W. (2020). A comparative performance assessment of ensemble learning for credit scoring. Mathematics, 8(10), 1756. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101756
Liu, J., Zhang, S., & Fan, H. (2022). A two-stage hybrid credit risk prediction model based on XGBoost and graph-based deep neural network. Expert Systems with Applications, 195, 116624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116624
Machado, M. R., & Karray, S. (2022). Assessing credit risk of commercial customers using hybrid machine learning algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications, 200, 116889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116889
Milojević, N., & Redzepagic, S. (2021). Prospects of artificial intelligence and machine learning application in banking risk management. Journal of central banking theory and practice, 10(3), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2021-0023
Mitra, R., Goswami, A., & Tiwari, M. K. (2022). Financial supply chain analysis with borrower identification in smart lending platform. Expert Systems with Applications, 208, 118026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118026
Moscato, V., Picariello, A., & Sperlí, G. (2021). A benchmark of machine learning approaches for credit score prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 165, 113986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113986
Paleti, S. (2024). Agentic AI in Financial Decision-Making: Enhancing Customer Risk Profiling, Predictive Loan Approvals, and Automated Treasury Management in Modern Banking. Multidiscip. Sci. Work. Manag. J, 34, 832-843. https://doi.org/10.7492/k614qm55
Rao, C., Liu, M., Goh, M., & Wen, J. (2020). 2-stage modified random forest model for credit risk assessment of P2P network lending to “Three Rurals” borrowers. Applied Soft Computing, 95, 106570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106570
Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature machine intelligence, 1(5), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x
Sadok, H., Sakka, F., & El Maknouzi, M. E. H. (2022). Artificial intelligence and bank credit analysis: A review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2023262. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.2023262
Zhu, L., Qiu, D., Ergu, D., Ying, C., & Liu, K. (2019). A study on predicting loan default based on the random forest algorithm. Procedia Computer Science, 162, 503-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.017
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Made Susilawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
