Published: 2026-06-02
Pro-Human Rights Leadership on Human Rights-Based Digitalization: Moderating Role of Organizational Culture in University
DOI: 10.35870/ijmsit.v6i1.7256
Sri Wartulas, Surahmadi, Agung Prayogi
- Sri Wartulas: Universitas Peradaban
- Surahmadi: Universitas Peradaban
- Agung Prayogi: Universitas Peradaban
Article Metrics
- Scopus Citations
- Google Scholar
- Crossref Citations
- Semantic Scholar
- DataCite Metrics
-
If the link doesn't work, copy the DOI or article title for manual search (API Maintenance).
Abstract
This research aims to examine the effect of pro-human rights leadership on human rights-based digitalization with organizational culture as a moderating variable in universities. This study uses a quantitative approach with an explanatory design. Data were collected from lecturers and students at Universitas Peradaban using purposive sampling. A total of 455 respondents participated in this research. Data analysis employed Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to examine the direct and moderating relationships among variables. The findings indicate that pro-human rights leadership positively and significantly affects human rights-based digitalization. Leaders who prioritize fairness, inclusiveness, transparency, and human rights protection are more capable of encouraging ethical and human-centered digital transformation in universities. Furthermore, organizational culture significantly strengthens the relationship between pro-human rights leadership and human rights-based digitalization. Universities with organizational cultures that support human rights values and digital ethics tend to enhance the effectiveness of leadership in implementing inclusive and responsible digital systems. The novelty of this research lies in integrating human rights perspectives into digital transformation studies in higher education and introducing organizational culture as a moderating factor in the relationship between pro-human rights leadership and human rights-based digitalization.
Keywords
Pro-Human Rights Leadership; Organizational Culture; Human Rights-Based Digitalization; University
Peer Review Process
This article has undergone a double-blind peer review process to ensure quality and impartiality.
Indexing Information
Discover where this journal is indexed at our indexing page.
Open Science Badges
This journal supports transparency in research and encourages authors to meet criteria for Open Science Badges.
How to Cite
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology. The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
-
Section: Articles
-
Published: 2026-06-02
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2026 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/ijmsit.v6i1.7256
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem.
Sri Wartulas, Universitas Peradaban
Elementary School Teacher Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Peradaban, Brebes Regency, Central Java Province, Indonesia
Surahmadi, Universitas Peradaban
Communication Science Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Peradaban, Brebes Regency, Central Java Province, Indonesia
-
Abukalusa, K., & Oosthuizen, R. (2025). An adaptive organisational leadership framework through systems thinking. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(8), 2673–2703. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2024-4635
-
Almanbahi, F. S., Awad, A., Ghonim, A., Alabsy, N. M., & Shemais, M. (2025). Ethical leadership and organizational excellence: the mediating role of citizenship behavior in healthcare. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1392. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05743-6
-
Alsaleh, A. (2024). The impact of technological advancement on culture and society. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 32140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83995-z
-
Alsharif, M., & Hnit, H. (2025). Digital human rights: Legal debates and emerging foundations under the international bill of human rights. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102160
-
Bogale, A. T., & Debela, K. L. (2024). Organizational culture: a systematic review. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2340129. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2340129
-
Bui, M., McIlwain, C., Olojo, S., & Chang, H.-C. H. (2026). Algorithmic discrimination: a grounded conceptualization. Information, Communication & Society, 29(2), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2516544
-
Camacho, L. J., Banks, M., Sookhai, S., & Concepción, E. (2025). Redimensioning the Theory of Planned Behavior on Workplace Energy Saving Intention: The Mediating Role of Environmental Knowledge and Organizational Culture. Sustainability, 17(8), 3574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083574
-
Çetinkaya, B., & Sürücü, L. (2025). The Influence of Digital Culture and Digital Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior. Studies in Media and Communication, 13(3), 236. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v13i3.7709
-
Cyfert, S., Dyduch, W., Szumowski, W., & Prause, G. (2025). Are we ready for digital transformation? The role of organizational culture, leadership and competence in building digital advantage. Central European Management Journal, 33(2), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/CEMJ-11-2024-0346
-
Domnic, N. A. (2026). Digital Transformation and Ethical Leadership: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Inclusive Progress. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 10(04), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.51505/ijebmr.2026.10413
-
Eke, D., & Stahl, B. (2024). Ethics in the Governance of Data and Digital Technology: An Analysis of European Data Regulations and Policies. Digital Society, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00101-6
-
Gaskin, J. E., Lowry, P. B., Rosengren, W., & Fife, P. T. (2025). Essential Validation Criteria for Rigorous Covariance‐Based Structural Equation Modelling. Information Systems Journal, 35(6), 1630–1661. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12598
-
Gebremeskel, B. K., Jonathan, G. M., & Yalew, S. D. (2023). Information Security Challenges During Digital Transformation. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.262
-
Hagger, M. S., & Hamilton, K. (2025). Progress on theory of planned behavior research: advances in research synthesis and agenda for future research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 48(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-024-00545-8
-
Haile, Z. T. (2023). Power Analysis and Exploratory Research. Journal of Human Lactation, 39(4), 579–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344231195625
-
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
-
Hoddy, E., & Gray, J. (2023). Human rights leadership in challenging times: an agenda for research and practice. The International Journal of Human Rights, 27(4), 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2022.2142212
-
Jiang, M., Zhang, J., & Arshad, M. Z. (2025). Cultivating a creative ecosystem: the role of inclusive leadership in educational success. Acta Psychologica, 257, 105076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105076
-
Kamal, M. B., Hossain, Md. B., Islam, J., Alam, I. K., Ibn Sayed, N., Assiri, M. A., & Mia, R. (2025). Digital Ethics: A Review of Leadership Theories, Challenges, and Responsibilities. Sage Open, 15(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251386901
-
Khazanchi, D., & Saxena, M. (2025). Navigating digital human rights in the age of AI: challenges, theoretical perspectives, and research implications. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, In Press, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2025.2452028
-
Kraus, S., Ferraris, A., & Bertello, A. (2023). The future of work: How innovation and digitalization re-shape the workplace. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(4), 100438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100438
-
Maleki, A. (2026). Rethinking ethical academic integrity ecosystems in higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 6(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-026-00887-z
-
Marolla-Gajardo, J., & Lozano Mas, M. Y. (2025). Anti-Bullying in the Digital Age: How Cyberhate Travels from Social Media to Classroom Climate in Pre-Service Teacher Programmes. Societies, 15(10), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15100284
-
Martini, E., & Sgambato, M. C. (2025). Digital Inequalities and Access to Technology: Analyzing How Digital Tools Exacerbate or Mitigate Social Inequalities. Societies, 15(11), 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15110318
-
Musah, A., Padi, A., Blay, M. W., Okyere, D. O., & Ofori, B. S. (2025). Ethical organisational culture, effective internal control systems and tax compliance of small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs): The role of corporate governance. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101331
-
Potocan, V., Nedelko, Z., & Rosi, M. (2025). Digitalization of Higher Education: Students’ Perspectives. Education Sciences, 15(7), 847. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070847
-
Rahmi, U., Santoso, Y., & Azrul, A. (2026). Integrating information system success and task technology models to develop a fit artificial intelligence-based evaluation system. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 23(2), 408–426. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-10-2025-0296
-
Sacavém, A., Machado, A. de B., Santos, J. R. dos, Palma-Moreira, A., Belchior-Rocha, H., & Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2025). Leading in the Digital Age: The Role of Leadership in Organizational Digital Transformation. Administrative Sciences, 15(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15020043
-
Schrempf‐Stirling, J., & Buren, H. J. Van. (2024). The Importance of Human Rights for Management and Organization Studies. British Journal of Management, 35(3), 1127–1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12799
-
Schünemann, C., Johanning, S., Herold, H., & Bruckner, T. (2024). Modelling the behaviour in socio-technical systems for policy assessment - A comparison of modelling approaches using the example of Sponge City concept implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 462, 142722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142722
-
Shan, S. (2024). The “Boundary” of Technology, Culture, and Digitalization. Emerging Media, 2(1), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/27523543241250133
-
Stahl, B. C. (2025). The Ethics of Data and Its Governance: A Discourse Theoretical Approach. Information, 16(6), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16060497
-
Tagscherer, F., & Carbon, C.-C. (2025). The role of transformational leadership in navigating digital servitization. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2025.100098
-
Vu, G. T. H., Nguyen, T. D., & Le, T. P. (2025). Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behaviors: The Mediating Effects of Psychological Empowerment and Work Engagement. SAGE Open, 15(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251335464
-
Wu, Y., Zhang, H., Jian, L., & Lv, Z. (2024). A quantitative causal analysis and optimization framework for inclusions of steel products. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 62, 102629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102629
-
Yu, T., Tian, Y., Chen, Y., Huang, Y., Pan, Y., & Jang, W. (2025). How Do Ethical Factors Affect User Trust and Adoption Intentions of AI-Generated Content Tools? Evidence from a Risk-Trust Perspective. Systems, 13(6), 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13060461

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.