Abstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of Key Performance Indicators (KPI) as a basis for determining employee salary increases at PT Sucorinvest Asset Management, Jakarta. Effective human resource management requires an objective performance measurement system to ensure that employee contributions are aligned with organizational goals and compensation policies. In this context, KPI serves as a strategic tool for measuring employee performance through measurable indicators and supporting managerial decision-making related to remuneration. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation involving seven informants representing managerial and operational levels within the organization. Data analysis followed the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, consisting of data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that the company has implemented a KPI system based on the Balanced Scorecard approach, integrating financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth perspectives into employee performance evaluation. KPI has been utilized as an important reference for salary increase decisions and performance monitoring. However, several challenges were identified, including inconsistent KPI socialization among employees, limited transparency in the conversion of KPI scores into salary increase percentages, variations in KPI monitoring practices across divisions, and the influence of external business conditions on KPI target achievement. These issues affect employees’ understanding and perceptions of fairness regarding the performance evaluation process. The study concludes that KPI provides a structured framework for performance appraisal and supports more objective salary increase decision-making. The findings highlight the importance of consistent KPI communication, greater transparency in remuneration mechanisms, and adaptive performance targets to enhance the effectiveness of KPI-based performance management systems.
Article Details
How to Cite
Citation FormatReferences
25 References- Aguinis, H., & Burgi-Tian, J. (2023). Measuring performance during crises and beyond: The performance management revolution. Business Horizons, 66(2), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.10.002
- Al-Matari, E. M., & Mgammal, M. H. (2024). The role of key performance indicators in improving organizational performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2022-0502
- Alkhyeli, A., & Hazmilah, H. (2025). Performance appraisal effectiveness in modern organizations: A systematic review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.46886/IJARBSS/v15-i9/18338
- Bayo-Moriones, A., Galdon-Sanchez, J., & Martinez-de-Morentin, S. (2020). Performance-based pay and employee productivity. Industrial Relations Journal, 51(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12286
- Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
- Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2021). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
- DeNisi, A., & Murphy, K. (2020). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(4), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000475
- Franco-Santos, M., & Otley, D. (2022). Reviewing and theorizing the unintended consequences of performance management systems. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(2), 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12283
- Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2023). Pay for performance: The research frontier. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100889
- Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600208
- Hoque, Z. (2019). Balanced scorecard implementation in organizations. Accounting & Finance, 59(3), 1901–1925. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12416
- Hussain, T., Abbas, J., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Akram, T. (2023). Impact of performance management systems on employee performance and engagement. Sustainability, 15(3), 2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032345
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.
- Marr, B. (2023). Key performance indicators: The definitive guide to measuring and managing performance. Kogan Page.
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
- Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.
- Niven, P. (2021). Balanced scorecard evolution: A dynamic approach to strategy execution. Wiley
- .
- OECD. (2023). Global financial markets report. OECD Publishing.
- Parmenter, D. (2022). Key performance indicators: Developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs (4th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119620778
- Pulakos, E. D., Hanson, R. M., Arad, S., & Moye, N. (2019). Performance management can be fixed: An on-the-job experiential learning approach for complex behavior change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2018.6
- Schaefer, T., & Heller, D. (2024). Performance management and work engagement. Management Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2023.100867
- Schleicher, D., Baumann, H., Sullivan, D., Levy, P., Hargrove, D., & Barros-Rivera, B. (2020). Putting the system into performance management systems. Journal of Management, 46(6), 895–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318755303
- Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
- Zhang, Y., Chen, X., & Li, J. (2025). The impact of performance management systems on employee work attitudes. Cogent Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2538717
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hilman Hidayat, Ratnawati Prayogi, Bambang Rismadi, Dwi Novita Sari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction, and adaptation in any medium (even commercially), provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. Authors retain copyright without restrictions and grant the journal the right of first publication as well as non-exclusive publishing rights for archiving, indexing, and scholarly dissemination.
Downloads
OJS UsageStats PluginMost read articles by the same author(s)
- Implementing Digital Media in Early Childhood Education: Teachers’ Practices and Institutional Support in North Jakarta, Indonesia Muhammad Fadhil Arafat, Ratnawati Prayogi, Alfred Inkiriwang · Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): January - June 2026
- Digital Patient Engagement through WhatsApp and Patient Loyalty: A Qualitative Case Study in Private Medical Practices in West Bandung, Indonesia Yulbrin Manurung, Ratnawati Prayogi, Auderey G. D. Tangkudung · Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): January - June 2026