Performance Analysis of Certification Institutions of Marine and Fisheries Professions from 2019 to 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/ijmsit.v4i2.3090Keywords:
Professional Certification Institution, Marine and Fisheries, LSP KP, Performance, CertificationAbstract
This research aims to analyze the performance of the Professional Certification Institute (LSP KP) for Marine and Fisheries during the period of 2019-2023. The performance of the LSP KP is measured based on indicators such as the number of certifications issued, the pass rate of competency test participants, and the level of stakeholder satisfaction. Data was collected through surveys, interviews, and related document analysis. The analysis results indicate an improvement in performance regarding the number of certifications issued; however, there are still challenges in service quality and the efficiency of the certification processing time. This research also identifies the factors that influence the performance of LSP, such as the availability of resources, the competence of assessors, and regulatory policies. The main conclusion of this research is that although the performance of LSP KP has improved, further enhancements are needed to reach higher standards. Recommendations are made for strengthening the capacity of assessors, improving infrastructure, and refining operational procedures. The implications of these recommendations include an improvement in the quality of certification and industry trust in LSP KP, which can ultimately contribute to enhancing the competitiveness of the workforce in the maritime and fisheries sector.
Downloads
References
Anderson, P. (2017). Certification in developing marine industries: Challenges and opportunities. Marine Policy Journal, 45(3), 112-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.02.003
Badan Nasional Sertifikasi Profesi. (2017). Panduan Sertifikasi Kompetensi. Jakarta. BNSP.
Black, K. (2019). Business Statistics: For Contemporary Decision Making (9th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Brown, J. (2019). Certification Standards and Processes in Maritime Industry. London: Nautical Press.
Brown, J., & Green, A. (2018). Training and Development in the Maritime Industry. New York: Maritime Press.
Cramer, D. (2020). Fundamentals of Data Analysis. London: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey Research Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Green, A. (2017). Operational Efficiency in Certification Bodies. New York: Quality Assurance Publications.
Green, A. (2020). Challenges and Strategies in Professional Certification. London: Academic Press.
Jones, A., & Williams, K. (2019). The role of certification in improving workforce competence in the fisheries sector. Journal of Marine Studies, 52(4), 245-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/jms.2019.120
Jones, M. (2019). Career Advancement through Certification. Boston: Career Pathways Publishing.
Jones, M. (2020). Impact of Professional Certification on Industry Standards. Boston: Industry Insight Publications.
Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan dan Perikanan. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan dan Perikanan Nomor 56/PERMEN-KP/2016 tentang Standar Kompetensi Kerja Nasional Indonesia. Jakarta: KKP.
Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Jakarta: Pemerintah Indonesia.
Kvale, S. (2007). Doing Interviews. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Maryuto, Herry. (2024). Laporan Capaian Kinerja Lembaga Sertifikasi Profesi Kelautan dan Perikanan. Jakarta LSP KP
Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries. (n.d.). Marine and fisheries workforce certification report: 2018-2022 growth trends. Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Publications.
Putri, A., & Santoso, B. (2019). The Impact of Professional Certification on Workplace Safety in the Maritime Industry. Journal of Maritime Studies, 12(3), 70-85.
Rahman, T. (2018). Challenges in Implementing Competency Standards in the Maritime Sector. Maritime Education and Training Journal, 10(2), 50-65.
Setiawan, D. (2020). Performance Analysis of Certification Bodies in Enhancing Maritime Workforce Competence in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Maritime Affairs, 15(1), 34-48.
Smith, J. D., & Johnson, M. L. (2020). Challenges in professional certification: Variability, transparency, and alignment with industry demands. Journal of Workforce Development, 35(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1000/jwd.2020.002
Smith, R. (2018). Participant Satisfaction in Certification Programs. San Francisco: Training and Development Press.
Smith, R. (2020). Safety and Professionalism in High-Risk Sectors. Chicago: Industrial Safety Press.
Taylor, R., & Brown, S. (2018). Standardization of competencies in the fisheries industry: Assessing certification bodies. International Journal of Fisheries Management, 41(1), 34-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifm.2018.01.004
White, L. (2021). Evaluating Certification Programs: Standards and Outcomes. New York: Quality Assurance Press.
Williams, P. (2017). Standards and Evaluations in Professional Certification. San Francisco: Certification Insights.
Williams, P. (2019). Evaluating the Impact of Certification on Industry. Chicago: Industrial Standards Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Imron Natsir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
